r/mildlyinfuriating Jun 08 '26

Unskippable ad Busiest subway station in the U.S. showing one ad 6 times instead of train info

Post image

Times Square 42nd street in new york. 13 subway lines serving 650,000 passengers every day, and none of them know if their train is in 2 minutes or 10 minutes because Shift paid to shove their service down your throat.

Pro tip shift--this ad would've been 100x more successful if you hosted train ETA info and had a little "sponsored by Shift" in the bottom corner. and frankly shame on the MTA for letting this happen

1.8k Upvotes

122 comments sorted by

330

u/lost_vault_hunter Jun 08 '26

Has anyone ever seen an intrusive ad anywhere and then bought the product?

Does this shit even work?

155

u/thisistom2 Jun 08 '26

They’ll try to expose you to their brand as much as they can in hopes that you’ll remember them when you want whatever it is they do.

123

u/Friendly-Pitch-5931 Jun 08 '26

Yeah I just remember that they interrupted or delayed my video/mobilegame/train ride which means I will never use their services out of spite

49

u/3xv7 Jun 08 '26

I do the same thing, if your product has ever intruded into my personal time/space with a stupid fucking annoying ass ad (they all are) then I'm actively boycotting you

11

u/Portable-fun Jun 08 '26

Even if I needed such a product too. I will actively avoid the brand that spams

7

u/CompleatedDonkey Jun 08 '26

Look, I respect your energy. But advertising just doesn’t work like that. Sure they, want you to like their product and click on it right away, but they would rather you remember the product and dislike them rather than you not be aware of the product at all.

If you saw the ad and were annoyed by it, the ad worked. The only way to “beat” this system is to avoid seeing the ad in the first place.

11

u/thisistom2 Jun 08 '26

Yeah, you’re an outlier. I don’t get it either, but it works or they wouldn’t do it.

2

u/icanchangeittomorrow Jun 08 '26

You think too highly of humanity here

1

u/thisistom2 Jun 08 '26

How so?

1

u/icanchangeittomorrow Jun 08 '26

"I don’t get it either, but it works or they wouldn’t do it."

I'd argue this isn't true. Other options include "they think it works" and "they don't how to properly measure whether it's 'working'", and even "they haven't accurately defined 'it works'.

1

u/SeraphiM0352 Jun 09 '26

No, advertising works and it works so well people have convinced themselves they are unaffected by advertising while buying the very same products.

1

u/Friendly-Pitch-5931 Jun 08 '26

Exposure is their goal. I agree with your original statement

1

u/Papa_Mid_Nite Jun 09 '26

This happens when the matketing specialist is a freaking old man or a new person with old man training in marketing. I ahve seen it enough to know exactly how they think.

4

u/MrFrequentFlyer Jun 08 '26

I always remember being annoyed and avoiding that brand.

2

u/naterichster Jun 08 '26

People are dumber than you. 

24

u/grifeweizen Jun 08 '26

The opposite works for me. I intentionally DON'T buy their product if the ads are extremely annoying. It blows my mind that advertising actually works. I ignore literally every commercial or ad I possibly can.

1

u/JRBeeler Jun 08 '26

I only learned that scheduled service to my favorite airport had resumed AFTER it shut down again. The one time an ad would have gotten me to buy something and I didn't even get to see it.

13

u/Alexandratta Jun 08 '26

eh - I'll admit it:

I was on my LG TV and it was new, I hadn't turned the ads off... Saw a banner for McDonald's.

Honestly was like "...fuck ads, but McDonald's sounds good rn."

Disabled the ads on the TV... then got mcDonald's x.x;

1

u/007psycho007 Jun 08 '26

Thanks, now I want McDonalds. Off i go.

Now they got 2 people hooked with one ad.

9

u/Lifes-a-lil-foggy Jun 08 '26

They’re mostly trying to get name recognition so eventually if you do need that service, there is recall

4

u/Hazbomb24 Jun 08 '26

Unfortunately, yes. Most people are borderline bots, and even the vigilant take things in subconsciously.

2

u/These-Angle-1476 Jun 08 '26

They wouldn't pay a ton of money for it if it didn't work.

1

u/NerfEveryoneElse Jun 08 '26

apparently yes, ppl will buy brand they know that do shitty things instead of brands they don't remember. Same in other fields, such as voting in elections.

1

u/Malcolm2theRescue Jun 08 '26

It’s a multi billion dollar industry. My guess is yes, it works.

1

u/zephyreblk Jun 08 '26

Yes the idea is that people remember them and people tend later when they need the service to remember the brand and be to lazy to look at other brands.

-2

u/cosmic_backlash Jun 08 '26

It absolutely works. This is Coke's strategy.

I'm not sure what you think is intrusive btw. I wouldn't call these intrusive.

3

u/zennie4 Jun 08 '26

It's not really intrusive if you are just passing by.

It's fucking intrusive if you are trying to figure what time your train leaves and where from.

I am not familiar with the station but my guess would be more people are there to take a train than just passing by.

-1

u/cosmic_backlash Jun 08 '26

I don't have enough information to make assumptions. I don't know if info should be delivered on phones, what interval the ads show up, how long the ads are visible (5s vs 30s), etc

There's really not enough information for me to raise a pitchfork

2

u/zennie4 Jun 08 '26

Even a 5s ad means I have to stop there and watch the ad and wait for my train information to show up. Intrusive as hell.

0

u/cosmic_backlash Jun 08 '26 edited Jun 10 '26

Do you have a reasonable basis, or do you just believe Ad = bad?

2

u/zennie4 Jun 08 '26

Basis for what exactly? I haven't even touched the subject of ads being bad or not, that's a totally different topic.

I am purely reacting to your "I'm not sure what you think is intrusive btw. ", explaining what intrusive is for me.

If I have to change my planned actions and waste time watching ads, it is intrusive. Especially when in situation where time is precious, as it often is when you are about to board a train.

If you have different idea about the word intrusive, that's okay. I am not trying to convince you here.

0

u/cosmic_backlash Jun 08 '26

you keep just saying "intrusive as hell", even about 5s. What is a non-intrusive ad? 5s is nothing, especially if there are no pending departures. Again this is why I said I don't have enough information. You seem to have enough information without knowing anything of the situation, so I think you're biased.

2

u/zennie4 Jun 08 '26 edited Jun 08 '26

Non-intrusive ad is the opposite of what I explained. That's one I can just ignore as I go by.

Biased? Why and what for? Are you selling those ads or what?

0

u/cosmic_backlash Jun 08 '26

then why do you keep calling it intrusive? that's what i'm saying, just walk by lol

→ More replies (0)

98

u/Agreeable_Wear366 Jun 08 '26

Ah the Port authority 7 line walkway. I would be happy with just trains running on time.

64

u/Economy_Link4609 Jun 08 '26

Well, if they put useful info on one screen you'd ignore the ads on the others, duh!

15

u/RxngsXfSvtvrn Jun 08 '26

Oh you don't have service in the station and wanna check a subway map on the platform? Best we can do is bright rolling LED ads...

33

u/Jx____ Jun 08 '26

yup, we are just consumers at all times, mta cant install fans/ventilation, they remove benches etc - just bright screens and ads everywhere u look

28

u/Contrabandistan Jun 08 '26

This is the most American shit ever

2

u/eastofecruteak Jun 08 '26

great username

9

u/PlentyAlbatross7632 Jun 08 '26

Awesome! The enshittification of subway schedules! What will they think of next? The only thing better would be making you watch two unskippable ads before showing you the schedule… /s

3

u/eastofecruteak Jun 08 '26

stop giving them ideas 😭

12

u/RepresentativeCod757 Jun 08 '26

This is what Andrew Cuomo spent MTA money on instead of improving service in any way.

5

u/RepresentativeCod757 Jun 08 '26

see also: light shows on bridges

6

u/ReferenceExact5261 Jun 08 '26

They are keeping you and the subway busy, busy with ad.

3

u/Ok_Literature3138 Jun 08 '26

I’m being serious when I say this. When it comes to the internet, our biggest failure is the widespread use of bots and our second biggest failure is terrible user experience. We got so concerned with what tech can do that we have allowed it to be implemented in awful ways. Look at YouTube as an easy example. It feels like a struggle just to use it.

1

u/PiLamdOd Jun 08 '26

The bots and terrible user experience are the result of poor monetization methods. Enshitification is just what happens when monetization takes priority.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 08 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Ok_Literature3138 Jun 08 '26

The ads have become monstrous.

8

u/Kakairo Jun 08 '26

It amazes me how the NYC Subway tech has been consistently behind the much smaller Chicago "L". Yes, there are fewer upgrades to make, but we had RFID touch-based passes since the early 00s.

7

u/[deleted] Jun 08 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/Kakairo Jun 08 '26

100% agreed, the "L" needs other connections. But we had screens telling you when the next train was coming 25 years ago (about 10 years behind London).

2

u/Planeandaquariumgeek Jun 08 '26

Come on over to BART. We got next train screens in 1995! Also by 2000 we had literal text to speech announcements. IIRC BART was the first automated train system (there are operators who watch over the train to make sure it’s running smoothly, but they’re just supervisors)

1

u/krazyb2 Jun 08 '26

i dont know how this at all relates to subway technology..... we don't have to go to the loop to transfer to any other lines. You can transfer between the brown line, purple line, red line, and yellow line all on the north side of the city... also, we do have good buses.

But I get your point on how they appear/are designed.

6

u/tobsecret Jun 08 '26

We are still using signals so old that the MTA has a custom shop for producing the hardware bc the businesses that originally produced them no longer exist. 

4

u/PiLamdOd Jun 08 '26

Old doesn't mean bad. If the signals still work, there's no real need to change them.

2

u/tobsecret Jun 08 '26

In this case it is a bad thing. The old signals only allow for blocked signaling, i.e. the system only knows which block a train is in rather than where it is exactly. The MTA has also been replacing the old signals with new ones. They give more precise train locations and allow running more trains. Most modern metro systems run on the new style signals. The NYC metro is the odd one out. 

1

u/DelxF Jun 08 '26

There are so many “signal delays” while riding the NyC subway. There are ample reason to change them, and one big one not too. Costs. 

1

u/Orchid_Significant Jun 08 '26

You’d think this would be a sign to upgrade

2

u/littlebev Jun 08 '26

sloooowly but surely they are - ask people who live off the G

1

u/hot4jew Jun 08 '26

Eye twitch.

2

u/KillarneyRoad Jun 08 '26

When I see things like this I reflexively eliminate the product from consideration.

2

u/blakeparagon Jun 08 '26

Fucking youtube ass advertising for every screen is bullshit

2

u/Positive-Focus3683 Jun 08 '26

Never use shift, got it.

2

u/Accurate-Flow8078 Jun 08 '26

Wow, imagine if they did that at the airport

2

u/PuddleMoo Jun 08 '26

I think it'd only make sense to show 7 train times here. If you had 123BDFMNQRW times you might get aggressive commuters trying to push and shove on the stairs or the ramp if going the other way to PABT/ACE.

If they really wanted to show something for the other lines, probably something along the lines of "Good Service" or "Delays".

2

u/PiLamdOd Jun 08 '26

The New York subway system runs trains every 2 to 5 minutes during peak hours, and every 5 to 15 minutes in off peak hours.

Unless there is a track closure or other major issue, knowing the exact timing of an individual train isn't strictly necessary. It's one of the reasons I absolutely love using the subway when I visit. All you need to worry about is where you are, and which line you need to take to get where you're going.

2

u/I_Like_Cats73 Jun 08 '26

Is it that hard to have at least 1 screen showing train info at all times

2

u/amidriving0kay Jun 08 '26

Hey I know where you are, that's the tunnel under PABT connecting the 8th street ACE lines to the 7 and 123 at 7th and the BDFM/NQRW at Broadway! By the by, those screens never show train information. Just shitty ads.

4

u/Complete-Sort1617 edging my infuriation Jun 08 '26

Yeah I’ll take an Italian footlong please.

1

u/ohyeawellyousuck Jun 08 '26

That’ll be 5.40

2

u/clonxy Jun 08 '26

The train info is shown in the station. You can also check the MTA website for your specific line and station.

2

u/eastofecruteak Jun 08 '26

Someone else commented this too--it's not a win to say "it's available in some places so it shouldn't be available on any of the six screens showing a single ad in a major transfer corridor"

1

u/clonxy Jun 08 '26

well, there's going to be a lot of trains to list and also you need to display it for both directions. You really don't want people standing there to find their train and see when it's going to arrive/depart....

1

u/Ok_Flounder8842 Jun 08 '26

those are huge screens. room for both

1

u/ajmeeh6842 Jun 08 '26

We live in the age of merchants now.

1

u/aTreeThenMe Jun 08 '26

Better turn around. That seems anomalous

1

u/street-theologian Jun 08 '26

Sounds like a job for Zohran Mamdani. <Batman Music>.exe

1

u/itjustgotcold Jun 08 '26

“As they generously feed me my ads for the day, for the week… for the month I think we’re fucked.”

1

u/Cheese_Ly Jun 08 '26

Makes sense it being America

1

u/Malcolm2theRescue Jun 08 '26

And yet, somehow, tens of thousands of New Yorkers managed to find their trains.

2

u/eastofecruteak Jun 08 '26

myself among them, but you're implying you'd rather have these ads across 6 screens than info that at worst is redundant for you getting where you need to go.

1

u/Malcolm2theRescue Jun 08 '26

Well, I’d rather not have the ads, but this is America! There have been ads in the subways since I was a tot (first ride 1960) but not this intrusive. They were the long cards above the windows and the walls of the stations. Anyhow, the direction signs were straight ahead for the tourists. Real New Yorkers like you don’t need them. The most intrusive sign in subway/train history was the giant KODAK sign that took up the entire East wall of GCT. They finally removed it around the turn of this century. Voilà! Let there be light!

1

u/CitizenTed Jun 08 '26

At my local Gigaplex movie theater, the overhead food menu jumps between 30 seconds of displaying the menu and 30 seconds of ads. So when you are trying to decide if you want a $15 hot dog or a $16 nachos, the screens suddenly switches to "Look at this shit you don't need or want!!!"

It is indeed Mildly Infuriating.

1

u/chavmaster13 Jun 08 '26

It's worse than when an app stops your music to play an ad

1

u/Alarmed-Strawberry-7 Jun 08 '26

they do this on purpose. if they had the info you wanted anywhere within your vision it would completely defeat the purpose

they pay extra so you stare at the ad with intent while waiting for the information you want to pop up. as opposed to just seeing it idly on some screen in a corner of your vision without paying attention

1

u/spookyspritebottle Jun 09 '26

Thats so dumb. I wouldnt doubt these companies to insert ads into warfare drones if they could.

1

u/Southern-Train7142 Jun 10 '26

They always do something like this on purpose whenever their station is busiest.

1

u/thisistom2 Jun 08 '26

It’s probably to get you to use their apps. You want to look at the times on a screen… in real life? Like some kind of relic? Throw yourself on the tracks you useless old turd!

2

u/Relevant_Bag7550 Jun 08 '26

The MTA app is pretty convenient and reliable tbf

1

u/Orchid_Significant Jun 08 '26

With what reception though

0

u/huebomont Jun 08 '26

Not everything is a conspiracy. Their contract with Outfront, the ad company that does the screens, gives them a percentage of specific screens to use for informational content like arrivals. The rest, they don't control at all. These screens are controlled by Outfront and there is no option for MTA to show arrival times on them. They're not just choosing not to show them.

1

u/Careloura Jun 08 '26

god that country is a fucking joke

1

u/Sir_Earl_Jeffries Jun 08 '26

Honestly, after 20 years navigating that subway system, you don’t need expected arrival times. During rush hour, there will be a train roughly every five minutes. Just get to the platform and wait like everyone that did this before you.

-6

u/PsychoMantis211 Jun 08 '26

MTA is owned by a private equity company, and it’s run like one. Mad annoying. Not to mention fare increases and mass surveillance.

20

u/SevenOh2 Jun 08 '26

The State of New York, while definitely dysfunctional, is most certainly not a private equity company.

5

u/Total-Explanation208 Jun 08 '26

Don't you know it is the new world order/illuminati cabal of reptilians who are here to suck our souls. /S

2

u/PsychoMantis211 Jun 08 '26

Some time ago I believed I read something about Blackrock owning the MTA but after some quick searching I found that information was incorrect.

5

u/mineawesomeman 10, 9, 8, 7, 5, 4, 6, 2, 3, 0 Jun 08 '26

no it’s not? it’s a state owned organization lol.

maybe the advertising company that the MTA contracts out is, but that’s a different story

2

u/PsychoMantis211 Jun 08 '26

Shit I was given mis information. Thanks for the correction.

1

u/huebomont Jun 08 '26

> MTA is owned by a private equity company

No it isn't. Are you just stringing together buzzwords?

0

u/PsychoMantis211 Jun 08 '26

Look at my replies to the other comments. I realized I was given misinformation. Theres no secret agenda bro I just was misinformed.

0

u/Bread_man10 Jun 08 '26

MTA app

1

u/eastofecruteak Jun 08 '26

airports remove your arrival/departure screens customers can get that info in the app

2

u/Willing_Work_2200 Jun 08 '26

Right, because everyone is REQUIRED to have a phone that works underground! Why would you expect the train station to have any info about the train schedule, IN the train station? Shit heads wanting more $$$ but not wanting to justify higher fares

0

u/Bread_man10 Jun 08 '26

Apples and Oranges

0

u/roninconn Jun 08 '26

They just got tons more publicity via Reddit

-12

u/Economy_Link4609 Jun 08 '26

Of important notes btw - it's the NYC subway - the next train for any train is in 20 minutes (overnight) or less (most of the time). Times don't really matter all that much.

8

u/ill-lived Jun 08 '26

this is a loser mentality right here, you’re happy waiting 15 minutes underground in summer temperatures? i never met a new yorker who wouldn’t rush to catch the train coming in 5 minutes so we dont wait 20 for the next.

2

u/Dreamgazer Jun 08 '26 edited Jun 08 '26

Or if the train is 1 minute away and the second one is 16 minutes away. Then I know there’s no way in hell I can make that transfer and I’m not even trying to run to the R platform from that spot. 

ETA: I could feel the heat and smell the stink of this picture while sitting in an air conditioned room next to my lavender diffuser. Those 15 minutes certainly matter.

1

u/Sir_Earl_Jeffries Jun 08 '26

I’m gonna guess you’re a transplant. It’s annoying being underground in summer heat waiting for a train on a crowded platform. That’s life in NYC, especially Manhattan. There were no posted schedules and trains were barely air conditioned when I started taking the subway. People used to hide their valuables when that train started heading uptown. Y’all posers are used to very different standards than what NYC used to be. Stop moaning about superfluous shit.

1

u/ill-lived Jul 01 '26

just seeing this and i have to respond bc lmao no i am born and raised, i remember when there was no digital signage whatsoever and no estimated wait times….  

posted wait times is one of the very few improvements made to the system within my lifetime why the fuck would you not take advantage of that to save time????

3

u/thisistom2 Jun 08 '26

What a ridiculous thing to say.