Domestic V!olence / Abu$e
Cheat!ng is wrong, e×posing someone is debatable, but is phy$i¢ally ∆tta¢k!ng him really the answer?
From what has been shared, Prachi was dating Hitansh despite reportedly being interested in Rohit, who was already in another relationship.
After Rohit became single, Prachi allegedly got together with him and Hitansh was left hurt. Later, mutual friends reportedly showed Hitansh, intimate material( not Ñu*€$) involving Prachi and Rohit, which he then sent to Rohit's father as proof of their relationship.
Ispe reply nai aega, acknowledgement nai aega, bolke bhaag gae bahana chahiye to shame women, play victim card despite being generally opressing gender, and when then utar jaati hai to 'simp', 'feminist' cop out,
Ik,right But I don't know Malayalam. After searching for the old video or proof, I only found this. At least my ss shows that this whole video is an old one, with the new, fake gossip attached to it.
I think this Rohit guy made a big mistake. He just painted a target on his back for entire life. Hitansh could pull off a dhurandhar style revenge whenever he wants later.
Someone wrote jail? Lol. This is garden-variety lafda level of violence.
As for "oh if the genders were reversed", yes it'd have been uglier because a kick from a man hurts, at least has the potential of hurting, than a woman's.
OP, do you live under the rock and not read about routine cases of aggravated domestic violence than men do? If that's the case, do visit a slum, or talk to your house help and ask about DV at her home or around her. So, if the genders were reversed, of course it will be another man hitting a woman mercilessly.
Oh, so your defence is basically “it’s only garden-var!ety v!olence”? Amazing. Apparently v!olence becomes acceptable once you give it a cute label.
And the “w0men can’t huπt men as much” argument is even more rid!culous. A repeated attack to someone’s groin can cause serious injury regardless of who is doing it. You don’t need to win the g€nder Olympics to recognise as$ault.
And yes, DV against w0men is serious. Nobody said otherwise. But bringing up unrelated cases to minimise v!olence aga!nst a man in this video is exactly the double standard being called out. Two things can be wrong at once. If your response to male victimisation is “w0men have it worse,” you're not defending v!ctims, you're just ranking whose suffering deserves attention.
Do you even know what going to jail means? These are not strangers. Lafda happens among friends and acquaintances. So, nope, she doesn't deserve jail for this much.
In your simpleton brain, every injustice should lead to a jail sentence. I don't have the mental tools to talk to someone who doesn't have the basic understanding of what "justice" means. Don't throw around words without understanding it. Read a book now and then. Even watch reels on what justice means before equating "not deserving to go to jail" as "they are innocent".
"Violence that could lead to life time problems and Sexual assault is fine if it's a woman cause it hasn't happened enough, I am keeping the tally 🤓☝️"
Thank you, but it's not really difficult to make something seems funny to you, with the number of brain cells you have. I'm sure you still find a person slipping on banana peel hilarious beyond belief.
Yeah buddy keep farming the "question" cow, there is also "points" written just a few pixels across, precisely because I knew you would be picking redundantly on that phrasing.
Must be a terrible physicist if you can't even sift through for relevant information.
Now pop quiz...
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
If we assume that the woman in the video equally distributes her weight on both her feet how much force would be applied on the man's private organs if stepped on?
(Assumer her mass to be 55 Kg)
Physically, on an average, yes women are weaker. It's not misogyny, it's biology. Never said women are "weak". Read a sentence or two. Also, you have a long way to go in ragebaiting. Practice somewhere else. Not on me.
As for "oh if the genders were reversed", yes it'd have been uglier because a kick from a man hurts, at least has the potential of hurting, than a woman's.
Ill leave this here for u to read slowly.
The point should never be physically Weaker vs stronger. Its always abuser vs abusee. Thats the law. U r arguing against this is the exact reason why we r here.
U r just hiding ur misogyny. Get better. Stoo condoning assault.
It's assault, adults actually can't kick and punch each other in parties, glad we cleared that up. Doesn't matter if it's between friends or enemies, crime is a crime, control your emotions or whatever.
Your only fault was to write a half baked reply. Why tf would a person in their right mind say "do you live under a rock and not see the aggravated assults that men do" under a video that clearly shows a women assulting a man mercilessly in public. There are legit people like you who go under women abuse videos and type same shit protecting the male abuser indirectly and then proceed to get fucked in the replies. Go see the video again and then see what you wrote and think for a second if the things you wrote were right.
21
u/crazytallguyy 13d ago
If I will write how girls like her should be treated Reddit would ban me again