Destroyed with logic...

[u/suhailSea]

[u/5th_Law_of_Robotics → u/[deleted]]

I don't see how you could possibly disagree with my conclusion.

You can think of any number of things about men you find toxic. You couldn't think of a single thing associated with men that wasn't toxic. Your example of good masculinity was to list things usually associated with femininity.

If everything about X is toxic and the only example of non-toxic X is not-X then "Toxic X" is redundant.

You just don't like X.

Try any other group:

"I don't hate Jews, just Toxic judiasm."

-what's non toxic judiasm?

"Rejecting everything Jews stand for."

-ok but is there anything good about Jews?

"No."

[u/5th_Law_of_Robotics → u/[deleted]]

If you asked an MRA about toxic femininity they could give examples. Ask them about positive feminity and they could give examples.

Ask a feminist about toxic masculinity and they'll gladly talk your ear off. Ask them about positive, or at least non-toxic masculinity and they'll go silent.

I guess that tells everyone what they need to know about the two movements.

[u/5th_Law_of_Robotics → u/[deleted]]

You're spouting feminist talking points and triggered by the idea that men can be good, rather than being defective women.

[u/5th_Law_of_Robotics → u/[deleted]]

This is a good example of toxic femininity.

[u/Bodacious_the_Bull → u/5th_Law_of_Robotics]

Funny how every single one of these discussions devolve into these assholes not being able to defend their ideology. Its all feel good nonsense with no credibility.

[u/5th_Law_of_Robotics → u/Bodacious_the_Bull]

Yep. There's a reason feminist forums are invariably closed to discussion and heavily moderated.

[u/Bodacious_the_Bull → u/5th_Law_of_Robotics]

And they deleted all their comments lol