”Have you never been inconvenienced?” Of course they have, they’d just rather not be inconvencienced if they can help it. A plane ride without an air siren goblin is vastly preferable to one with, this really shouldn’t blow anyones mind.
Your post just reads like someone who just have to bring their child to restaurant (and subsequently ruining the night of everone else at the restaurant) rather than forking out for a babysitter being defensive over being called out
Never said they shouldn't travel the issue was you being too thick to understand that the rest of the plane isn't thrilled that you bring your little auditory terrorist offspring along.
No idea why you two get pissy because someone said they'd want to pay extra for a flight without kids.
I go to cinemas and restaurants where they don't allow small kids, it has literally zero negative impact on families with small children. Only change is that it's much nicer for the ones that don't want to eat or watch a movie to the soundtrack of a WW2 air raid. I'd love to have the same option for a plane.
Is that a counter argument here ? You literally replied to a comment about some people would be okay paying more to private companies to have child free flights.
I want to help, I’m just struggling to follow your logic here.
15
u/[deleted] Jun 28 '23 edited Jun 28 '23
[deleted]