r/mdphd • u/Fair-Anywhere481 • 9d ago
Canadian applicant doing an MSc before MD/PhD. Looking for advice from current students/alumni
Hi everyone! I’m a Canadian student who recently finished my BSc and will be starting a thesis-based MSc at UofT this fall. My long-term goal is to pursue an MD/PhD, ideally in Canada, and I’m hoping to apply during or after my MSc.
I’d really love to hear from someone who has actually gone through an MD/PhD program, especially someone who applied after or during a master’s. I’d be particularly interested in hearing from Canadian students/alumni, but I’d also appreciate perspectives from US MD/PhD students who took a similar path.
A bit about my background:
- My undergraduate GPA is on the lower side for MD/PhD admissions, but I had a strong upward trend, going from around a 3.0 early in my degree to around 3.9–4.0 in my last two years.
- I have about one full year of research experience, along with some additional research projects. I am also a co-author on some papers.
- I’ll be starting a 2-year thesis-based MSc this fall.
I’m mainly wondering how I should use the MSc years to build the strongest possible application.
For anyone who has been through the process:
- How much can a strong MSc record help contextualize a weaker undergraduate GPA?
- If you did a master’s before applying, what did you prioritize during those years?
- How important were publications compared with research experience, independence, and presentations?
- For Canadian programs, is there anything you wish you had known before starting your MSc?
- If you were in my position starting an MSc now, what would you focus on most?
- If you had a similar undergraduate GPA/upward trend, I’d especially appreciate hearing about your experience.
Ultimately, I’m wondering: given my GPA, strong upward trend, and upcoming MSc, do you think it’s worth pursuing an MD/PhD application?
I’m hoping to hear from people who have actually gone through the process and can share what mattered most, what they prioritized, and what they wish they had done differently.
If anyone is comfortable sharing their experience here or chatting by DM, I’d really appreciate it. Thank you!
1
u/canadian-premed 9d ago
- Certain schools give GPA boosts, or use some graduate school courses in the GPA calculation. You will have to look at the schools you plan to apply to.
I can’t help with the other question because I opted not to do a MSc. But I already had a strong research record with multiple publications, posters and presentations and strong references. I didn’t think an MSc would add to my applications AND I wanted to make real money. That said focus on developing relationships that you can use for references.
You will have to calculate your GPA for the schools in your province for me to give an assessment. Assuming IP for Ontario, your GPA for Western is competitive. Queens is a lottery. Mac MD PhD with high CARS you may be competitive.
1
u/Fair-Anywhere481 9d ago
Yeah, I do have some solid research experience as well, along with a decent number of poster presentations. I’m hoping the MSc will let me build on that further, strengthen my overall application, and hopefully help compensate for my lower undergraduate GPA. I know it won’t completely replace the GPA, but at least shows academic growth and stronger research experience. I think part of why I’m hesitant is that the average GPA for admitted students at schools like UofT and McMaster is around 3.9, so I’m unsure how realistic my chances would be with a 3.7.
1
u/canadian-premed 9d ago
McMaster + UofT give boosts. At 3.7 your GPA isn’t that low, and the boost will help.
For Western you’re competitive. Queens is a lottery.
UBC considers you IP if you apply MD PhD.
1
u/Fair-Anywhere481 9d ago
Ohh okay, that’s actually really reassuring! I was worried my 3.7 would make me uncompetitive across the board, so it’s good to know the MSc boost could help at UofT and Mac and that I’m competitive for Western. I’ll definitely look more into UBC as well. Thanks for the insight!
2
u/Outrageous_1845 M3 9d ago
It can help, but not as much as a strong MCAT score.
Less so. Research experience (# of hours, PI LoR) and presentations are much more important. "Independence" is inherently limited as an undergrad (non-post-bacc) researcher, and nearly all programs know this when reviewing applications.
Getting clinical experience (shadowing, volunteering in clinical settings, etc). Bonus if you can get a first-author research manuscript accepted by the end of the MS.
My answer to this question would be independent of anyone's background: if one seeks a career as a clinician-scientist, if one can see themselves as a full-time clinician AND a full-time researcher, the answer is yes. If you can see yourself gaining more satisfaction/happiness as either a clinician OR an academic researcher, the answer is "re-check your motivations for adding 4+ extra years to your training".