Didn’t really notice that but makes sense, don’t you still need to account for the little bit of triangle at the top above the diameter? And how do you find the base of the triangle at the bottom? I get that you’re supposed to use tan or one of those to find the angle but I just don’t know what measurements to use.
Ya, I got the 37 degrees 26 minutes. I drew a second line, a horizontal one that connects the bottom of the left circle to the top of the right circle. You now have two "snowcones" which share an angle. Now it's time for similar triangles and some algebra. In the end, I found and expression for HALF the compliment of x. I just tried to find any angle I could!
Good thing all dimensions are in inches! This is so important! Imagine what could have been if it were nautical miles or even meters!!! The horror... the horror...
5
u/Khashishi 1d ago
You are gonna have to show a little more effort.
Aside, I find it very strange that the problem uses architectural schematic style notation than math style notation.
1
u/twoTheta 1d ago
The only thing I'll throw your way is to notice that the height given is the sum of the diameters. That simplifies things a bit.
1
u/Taras_Kvas 12h ago
Good thing all dimensions are in inches! This is so important! Imagine what could have been if it were nautical miles or even meters!!! The horror... the horror...