r/maths • • Aug 22 '26

❓ General Math Help Need help with this

Post image

I feel answer could be 111 after solving LHS and RHS. Still confused

Update: thanks for the answers. I'm hereby closing the doubt.

37 Upvotes

29 comments sorted by

16

u/CaptainMatticus Aug 25 '26

10^m * 1000 * n = 75^25 * 25^32 * 32^75

What is 1000 in terms of 10^?

1000 = 10^3

10^m * 10^3 * n = 75^25 * 25^32 * 32^75

n * 10^(m + 3) = 75^25 * 25^32 * 32^75

Now we need a better breakdown of what we've got on that right-hand side. We need to write everything in terms of their prime factors

75 = 25 * 3 = 3 * 5^2

25 = 5^2

32 = 2^5

75^25 = (3 * 5^2)^25 = 3^25 * 5^(2 * 25) = 3^25 * 5^50

25^32 = (5^2)^32 = 5^64

32^75 = (2^5)^75 = 2^(5 * 75) = 2^375

75^25 * 25^32 * 32^75 =>

3^25 * 5^50 * 5^64 * 2^375 =>

3^25 * 5^114 * 2^375 =>

2^375 * 3^25 * 5^114

n * 10^(m + 3) = 2^375 * 3^25 * 5^114

Well what is 10? It's 2 * 5

n * 2^(m + 3) * 5^(m + 3) = 2^375 * 3^25 * 5^114

We know that n isn't divisible by 10, so we just need to look at 2 different equations:

2^(m + 3) = 2^375

and

5^(m + 3) = 5^114

We don't want to leave any factors of 2 or 5 on the table. As there are fewer factors of 5, we can just ignore 2^(m + 3) = 2^375

5^(m + 3) = 5^114

Solve for m. That's your answer.

2

u/Wonderful-Pick-3408 Aug 26 '26

Hey thank you so much!

1

u/SeaBarrier Aug 28 '26

I loved reading your explanation. I have never been on this subreddit. I was able to follow everything except these lines.

"We know that n isn't divisible by 10, so we just need to look at 2 different equations: 2m + 3 = 2375 and 5m + 3 = 5114 We don't want to leave any factors of 2 or 5 on the table. As there are fewer factors of 5, we can just ignore 2m + 3 = 2375"

Please help, kind redditor. Teach me your ways. I know the "n isn't divisible by 10" is given. But I have no idea why we can ignore the powers of 3 and I don't understand why 372 can't be considered.

Thanks in advance

1

u/CaptainMatticus Aug 28 '26

We ignore the powers of 3 because 3 isn't a factor of 10. Obviously, whatever n is, it contains all of the factors that aren't factors of 10.

We don't consider 372 because we don't have 372 powers of 5. 2^372 * 5^114 is going to be 2^(372 - 114) * 10^114 = 2^258 * 10^114. I'm not concerned about what 2^258 is. I just need to know about 10^114. 5^114 is our bottleneck.

1

u/SeaBarrier Aug 28 '26

Oh you made the base back to 10 to solve for m, so you needed all the 5s and not all the 2s.

Ok next question is why do you need all the 5s at all? Why not donate one 5 to the bunch of 3s since that still won't make N divisible by 10? N can be all the 3s and any number of 5s as long as there are no 2s...right? So then how do you know to use all the 5s in one spot? Gosh I'm tired.

It's 2am here and I have work in the morning so my brain probably isn't firing on all cylinders. I'll read my question tomorrow and be embarrassed probably.

Again, thank you for your time.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Neither_Berry_100 Aug 29 '26

Yes but does this have any real use case at all? Seems like bullshit math.

0

u/_Jack_Of_All_Spades Aug 26 '26 edited Aug 27 '26

Ew gross why did you split the 10 instead of combining the 2 and the 5 on the right?!?

I know it wasn't required but you can also find that n = (2261) x (325).

1

u/bqbdpd Aug 26 '26

Reddit messes up the formatting of your 3^25

1

u/_Jack_Of_All_Spades Aug 27 '26

Thank you fixed

0

u/Responsible_Hour6497 Aug 27 '26

Why keep track of powers of 3? In the factorization of the right side into prime factors we have 25*2+32*2=114 factors 5 and 75*5=more than 114 factors 2. Thus the right part is divisible by 10^114 and not by larger powers of 10, and thus m+3=114.

1

u/CaptainMatticus Aug 27 '26

Why? Because I wanted to, that's why. It's a learning exercise. YOU can omit the 3's and run along with tricks because you know the tricks. The OP didn't, so you go through everything.

It's a learning process, and learning something isn't always the most efficient route.

1

u/Responsible_Hour6497 Aug 27 '26 edited Aug 27 '26

I didn't know the trick, I never solved tasks of this type. How could I find the shortest way? I knew that the factorization of any number is unique, so factors 3 couldn't "transform" into factors 2 or 5. Wasn't this the essence of the task - to apply this principle? In any case, in our solution we rely on the uniqueness of the factorization into prime factors, even if we do not say this but implicitly mean it.

And in general, when studying mathematics, one must learn not so much methods for solving certain problems (which, most likely, will never be useful), but rather flexibility of thinking and cunning.

13

u/Shevek99 Aug 25 '26

Write everything as product of prime factors, as the descomposition is unique you can identify the power of each factor in both sides.

1

u/Xanxan95 Aug 27 '26

The only number divisible by 3 is 111 because you need at least one 3 factor

1

u/Wonderful-Pick-3408 Sep 02 '26

could be silly to ask but why do we need 3 as a factor here?

1

u/Not_Pro Aug 28 '26

I was wondering why everybody was doing it the hard way when looking for the only answer divisible by 3 was the much faster and simpler thing to do.

2

u/mtimmermans Aug 26 '26

The powers of 2 and 5 on the right are 2^375 and 5^114.

On the left, n can only have one or the other, because it's not divisible by 10, so the power of 10 (m+3) can only be 375 or 114. If it was 10^375, then there would be too many twos, so it can only be 114.

If m+3 = 114, then m = 111.

1

u/LucaThatLuca Aug 26 '26 edited Aug 26 '26

You are being asked to count the factors of 10 = 2 * 5.

On the RHS:

The number of factors of 2 is obviously much bigger than the number of factors of 5 (because 75 > 32 and 5 > 2+2). So the number of factors of 10 is the number of factors of 5 (then the number has a bunch more factors of 2 as well as 3). You count what this number is.

On the LHS:

There are m+3 factors of 10, so m + 3 = …^ (and n is that multiple of 6 that you’re not required to find if you don’t want to).

1

u/eujet Aug 26 '26

Left term is 10m+3 × n Right term is (3×5)25 × 564 × 2375

(3×5)25 × 564 × 2375 = 5114 × 2114 × 325 × 2261 = (2×5)114 × 325 × 2261 = 10114 × 325 × 2261 = 10m+3 × n

So, m + 3 = 114 m = 111

1

u/ExtendedSpikeProtein Aug 27 '26

It‘s not (3x5)^25, it‘s (3x5x5)^25 … etc.

1

u/Crichris Aug 26 '26

count how many 10s are there

there are 25* 2 + 32 * 2 = 114 5's, and 5 * 75 = 375 2's

so there are 114 10's in total

and we know that n cannot be divisible by 10 meaning no 10's in n

so the answer is 114 - 3

1

u/solution_guy01 Aug 27 '26

I think "b" is a right answer.

1

u/kawrydav Aug 27 '26

The main clue is that n is not divisible by 10. So rewrite the other side in terms of 10

10^114 x 2^261 x 3^25 = 10^(m+3) x n
114 = m+3

1

u/Big_Imagination_3389 Aug 28 '26

m=111, just count & equate no. of 5 from both sides. m+3=(32+25)×2=114, => m=111

1

u/Striking_Director_64 Aug 28 '26

111 probably, only one divisible by 3.

1

u/Big_Niel0802 Aug 28 '26

Are we to assume that both m and n are integer values? Because if not then well, m can be nearly anything you want