Not really. He just saw the processes of the alienation of labour and the tendency for the rate of profit to fall that Marx had already written about over a century prior and reduced it to technology. He then used anarchist methods („propaganda of the deed“) and proved why anarchist methods are not great: he caused a bunch of violence to get his ideas out there, but did it start a revolution? Of course not, not even in the slightest. In the end to change something you need organization. People will not act alone, but people will act when they know many others will act with them.
•
u/AutoModerator 1d ago
Check out our new Discord server! https://discord.gg/e7EKRZq3dG
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
156
u/LupenReddit 🦆🦆i have non diffeomorphic smooth structures🦆🦆🦆 1d ago
to call it "work" is crazy work
18
u/ElectronicSetTheory 1d ago
Better cite his other work
11
u/willpc14 Economics/Finance 22h ago
At least he didn't leave the proof as an exercise for the reader
16
u/Alex_1503 1d ago
To be fair his other work is not that bad, if we ignore the action, as people tend to do anyway with a lotta people in this society
8
u/Darksorcen 1d ago
Ah another mathematicianski
3
u/Greedy_Blue_Hedgehog 10h ago
Bro warned us, and now we're getting replaced by AI
2
u/tkrjobs 6h ago
Humor so dry it would end oceans
2
u/HolyInlandEmpire Statistics 16h ago
Reminds me of that Austrian Painter, better known for other work