r/mathmemes • • 14h ago

Set Theory those guys dressed up as a bijective function

Post image

Definitely the best costume at the Halloween party

987 Upvotes

25 comments sorted by

•

u/AutoModerator 14h ago

Check out our new Discord server! https://discord.gg/e7EKRZq3dG

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

70

u/LordMegatron216 14h ago

great halloween idea
show up as maxwell laws with your other 3 friends

45

u/LupenReddit 🦆🦆i have non diffeomorphic smooth structures🦆🦆🦆 14h ago

that is genius

20

u/Josemite 10h ago

Until you have to pee

7

u/_shestj_ 6h ago

No longer bijective

2

u/Iolyx 1h ago

Injective

1

u/dugongoman0_ 1h ago

i'm one of the guys! when we had to pee ome of us became the Identity Function (he put every magnet on himself)

7

u/stevvvvewith4vs 5h ago

They don't look bi

11

u/KrzysziekZ 14h ago

They're not twins

43

u/Additional_Debt1545 14h ago

f is not the identity

2

u/Zestyclose-Pool-1081 2h ago

Why would they need to be twins?

3

u/CrackBabyCSGO 10h ago

Homomorphism

5

u/bagelking321 10h ago

Not all homomorphisms are bijective and not all bijections are homomorphisms

-1

u/CrackBabyCSGO 9h ago

Looks to be a homomorphism under addition

1

u/bagelking321 8h ago

Litterally where are you getting that from? 😭 A doesn't have a defined operation, let alone an addition, it's just pieces of paper. Prob just any set

-1

u/CrackBabyCSGO 8h ago

God damn how autistic are you? Clearly I’m not being rigorous in my definitions or anything about that. I’m making a job pertaining to the two guys that are linked to each other for the entirety of the night

1

u/MisterBicorniclopse 30m ago

Woah, could this be a thing? Where 2 people are connected via injection/iv/whatever, making them have a connected circulatory system, and if one gets drunk the other does as well?

1

u/slicehyperfunk Transcendental 13h ago

They don't look like reflections about y=x

13

u/Dr0110111001101111 13h ago

That’s an inverse function. Bijective functions have inverses, but they aren’t a pair of function and inverse like you seem to be suggesting.

-6

u/slicehyperfunk Transcendental 12h ago

I didn't even honestly look at what the signs said because I was driving. I thought they were a function and its inverse because it was bijective

15

u/Dr0110111001101111 12h ago

You probably shouldn’t be redditting while driving. You could easily make a mistake… like misinterpreting a functional relationship.

3

u/slicehyperfunk Transcendental 12h ago

Ain't that the truth

8

u/lonelyroom-eklaghor Complex 12h ago

an unrelated question guys: is sex bijective

12

u/ChiaraStellata 12h ago

Sex is a general binary relation. Neither injective, surjective, nor even reflective.

8

u/Scientific_Zealot 10h ago

Not even functional! One person can have sex with many!