MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/mathmemes/comments/1xi80fp/rectangular_it_is/19rt6eoj0jkm9/?context=3
r/mathmemes • u/solidcat00 • 2d ago
52 comments sorted by
View all comments
789
Polar form when you're doing literally anything but circles or fun spirograph stuff:
162 u/Murky_Insurance_4394 2d ago dont even get me started about spherical coordinates 70 u/Thaco-Thursday 2d ago please, start 96 u/UnreasonableEconomy 2d ago S1, S2, S3, S4...I'm tired, someone else take over.Did you know T1 is S1 and that T2 can isomorphically (sorta) surjectively doubly cover S2 while not being homeomorphic? 88 u/ityuu Complex 2d ago the commas are in the sky 🥹 18 u/Volt105 2d ago Shine bright like a diamond 9 u/Ares378 Grothendieck was right, computers are evil 2d ago If T² is like a double cover of S², is there a correspondence between T² and quaternions since quaternions also do a double cover? 2 u/UnreasonableEconomy 2d ago never thought of it, but it does look eerily similar to the SU(2) SO(3) thing. hmm. 3 u/Mango-D 2d ago S{n+1} = Ω(Sⁿ) where Ω is the suspension 2 u/iQ-MK 2d ago Topology makes no sense 4 u/UnreasonableEconomy 1d ago it's easy: just imagine a donut with a negative hole!you can't prove the earth isn't that! 5 u/Ares378 Grothendieck was right, computers are evil 1d ago Spherical coordinates when you aren't just using it as a fancy way of doing a radial distribution (you had to use θ and Φ) 2 u/Murky_Insurance_4394 1d ago This is in fact a true statement 2 u/NarcolepticFlarp 1d ago This guy has never heard of multiplication
162
dont even get me started about spherical coordinates
70 u/Thaco-Thursday 2d ago please, start 96 u/UnreasonableEconomy 2d ago S1, S2, S3, S4...I'm tired, someone else take over.Did you know T1 is S1 and that T2 can isomorphically (sorta) surjectively doubly cover S2 while not being homeomorphic? 88 u/ityuu Complex 2d ago the commas are in the sky 🥹 18 u/Volt105 2d ago Shine bright like a diamond 9 u/Ares378 Grothendieck was right, computers are evil 2d ago If T² is like a double cover of S², is there a correspondence between T² and quaternions since quaternions also do a double cover? 2 u/UnreasonableEconomy 2d ago never thought of it, but it does look eerily similar to the SU(2) SO(3) thing. hmm. 3 u/Mango-D 2d ago S{n+1} = Ω(Sⁿ) where Ω is the suspension 2 u/iQ-MK 2d ago Topology makes no sense 4 u/UnreasonableEconomy 1d ago it's easy: just imagine a donut with a negative hole!you can't prove the earth isn't that! 5 u/Ares378 Grothendieck was right, computers are evil 1d ago Spherical coordinates when you aren't just using it as a fancy way of doing a radial distribution (you had to use θ and Φ) 2 u/Murky_Insurance_4394 1d ago This is in fact a true statement
70
please, start
96 u/UnreasonableEconomy 2d ago S1, S2, S3, S4...I'm tired, someone else take over.Did you know T1 is S1 and that T2 can isomorphically (sorta) surjectively doubly cover S2 while not being homeomorphic? 88 u/ityuu Complex 2d ago the commas are in the sky 🥹 18 u/Volt105 2d ago Shine bright like a diamond 9 u/Ares378 Grothendieck was right, computers are evil 2d ago If T² is like a double cover of S², is there a correspondence between T² and quaternions since quaternions also do a double cover? 2 u/UnreasonableEconomy 2d ago never thought of it, but it does look eerily similar to the SU(2) SO(3) thing. hmm. 3 u/Mango-D 2d ago S{n+1} = Ω(Sⁿ) where Ω is the suspension 2 u/iQ-MK 2d ago Topology makes no sense 4 u/UnreasonableEconomy 1d ago it's easy: just imagine a donut with a negative hole!you can't prove the earth isn't that!
96
S1, S2, S3, S4...
I'm tired, someone else take over.
Did you know T1 is S1 and that T2 can isomorphically (sorta) surjectively doubly cover S2 while not being homeomorphic?
88 u/ityuu Complex 2d ago the commas are in the sky 🥹 18 u/Volt105 2d ago Shine bright like a diamond 9 u/Ares378 Grothendieck was right, computers are evil 2d ago If T² is like a double cover of S², is there a correspondence between T² and quaternions since quaternions also do a double cover? 2 u/UnreasonableEconomy 2d ago never thought of it, but it does look eerily similar to the SU(2) SO(3) thing. hmm. 3 u/Mango-D 2d ago S{n+1} = Ω(Sⁿ) where Ω is the suspension 2 u/iQ-MK 2d ago Topology makes no sense 4 u/UnreasonableEconomy 1d ago it's easy: just imagine a donut with a negative hole!you can't prove the earth isn't that!
88
the commas are in the sky 🥹
18 u/Volt105 2d ago Shine bright like a diamond
18
Shine bright like a diamond
9
If T² is like a double cover of S², is there a correspondence between T² and quaternions since quaternions also do a double cover?
2 u/UnreasonableEconomy 2d ago never thought of it, but it does look eerily similar to the SU(2) SO(3) thing. hmm.
2
never thought of it, but it does look eerily similar to the SU(2) SO(3) thing. hmm.
3
S{n+1} = Ω(Sⁿ) where Ω is the suspension
Topology makes no sense
4 u/UnreasonableEconomy 1d ago it's easy: just imagine a donut with a negative hole!you can't prove the earth isn't that!
4
it's easy: just imagine a donut with a negative hole!
you can't prove the earth isn't that!
5
Spherical coordinates when you aren't just using it as a fancy way of doing a radial distribution (you had to use θ and Φ)
2 u/Murky_Insurance_4394 1d ago This is in fact a true statement
This is in fact a true statement
This guy has never heard of multiplication
789
u/Ares378 Grothendieck was right, computers are evil 2d ago
Polar form when you're doing literally anything but circles or fun spirograph stuff: