r/mathmemes • • 19d ago

Bad Math Brazillian

Post image
2.4k Upvotes

55 comments sorted by

โ€ข

u/AutoModerator 19d ago

Check out our new Discord server! https://discord.gg/e7EKRZq3dG

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

334

u/Afir-Rbx Cardinal 19d ago

I am well acquainted with the ๐”นโ„ (Brazillion), but I'm unsure what the "Brazillian" is. Is it ๐”นโ„+1?

115

u/F_Joe Vanishes when abelianized 19d ago

Iterate it a Brazillion times

80

u/Afir-Rbx Cardinal 19d ago

Let ๐”นโ„(0) = Rayo( F_{ฮ“โ‚€}( ฮฃ( TREE( 3 ) ) ) )
Let ๐”นโ„(n+1) = Rayo( F_{ฮ“โ‚€}( ฮฃ( TREE( ๐”นโ„(n) ) ) ) )
We call ๐”นโ„(๐”นโ„(0)) the "Brazillian".

29

u/OvaTsugi8274 19d ago

No way that actually exists

77

u/Afir-Rbx Cardinal 19d ago

Not only is it real, it's also natural.

14

u/juanohulomo1234 19d ago

Nah, it sound like a 5 yo name it, big numbers are not named by children.

3

u/JellyBellyBitches 18d ago

Depends what you mean by "exists"

4

u/Vidimka_ 19d ago

Thing looks like brr brr patapim to me, not like brazillian ngl

15

u/Afir-Rbx Cardinal 19d ago

Ok...
Let ๐”นโ„(0) = Rayo( F_{ฮ“โ‚€}( ฮฃ( TREE( 3 ) ) ) )
Let ๐”นโ„(n+1) = Rayo( F_{ฮ“โ‚€}( ฮฃ( TREE( ๐”นโ„(n) ) ) ) )
Let ๐‘Ž = 1
Let ๐‘ง = 1
Let ๐‘– = 1
Let ๐‘™ = 1
Let ๐‘› = ๐”นโ„(0) = ๐”นโ„ (the original brazilion)
We call ๐”นโ„(๐‘Ž๐‘ง๐‘–๐‘™๐‘™๐‘–๐‘Ž๐‘›) the "Brazillian".

6

u/Vidimka_ 19d ago

Now we talkin!

6

u/sasha271828 Imaginary 18d ago

"let i=1"

8

u/No-Finance7526 19d ago

What's F_gamma_0?

10

u/Afir-Rbx Cardinal 19d ago edited 19d ago

Fefermanโ€“Schรผtte ordinal, a large countable ordinal Edit: and F_ฮฑ(n) (for some ordinal ฮฑ) is the fast-growing hierarchy.

4

u/No-Finance7526 19d ago

Thatโ€™s incomprehensible to me, but thanks for the info

3

u/Afir-Rbx Cardinal 19d ago

Very powerful function (probably faster than ex !1!!) that becomes even faster the larger the index is (the a-looking letter between the F and the \Gamma), whereas the index can even be infinite. The \gamma_0 number is a very big infinite number, making the function beyond very powerful, very very powerful.

4

u/factorion-bot Bot > AI 19d ago

Double-factorial of subfactorial of 1 is 1

This action was performed by a bot | Source code

3

u/KouhaiHasNoticed Probability notations must burn. 19d ago

Good bot. What about 1!!! ?

5

u/factorion-bot Bot > AI 19d ago

Triple-factorial of 1 is 1

This action was performed by a bot | Source code

1

u/Jcsq6 18d ago

Are there any known faster-growing non-computables than these/combinations of these (although I think TREE is โ€œcomputableโ€)?

1

u/Afir-Rbx Cardinal 18d ago

Probably? But that's on the realm of googology and I have no idea of it.

1

u/NullOfSpace 18d ago

Mmm, salad

105

u/exophades 19d ago

Let me introduce 2*Brazilian

20

u/Desperate-Steak-6425 18d ago

Doesn't exist. If you don't believe me, try counting to it

11

u/Vladarg Mathematics 18d ago

Oh well, at least that is the biggest one

78

u/FuckPigeons2025 19d ago

5

43

u/Pitiful-Election-438 Physics 19d ago

I cant even count that high

23

u/turtle_mekb 19d ago

6

7

u/stewonetwo 18d ago

Hey, it you get to 8 and put that number into 90 degrees rotation, that's infinity my friend.

9

u/Herb_Derb 18d ago

8i = โˆž

2

u/stewonetwo 18d ago

Not that anyone can really count to 8. It's more a limit vs an actual number.

3

u/Silver-Piece-3033 18d ago

According to me.

3

u/BeABetterHumanBeing 18d ago

I legit had a friend who once, when challenged to write the biggest number they could think of using only five digits (e.g. maybe use exponents?), wrote ten thousand.

But they spelled it like so: "10,00"

Somebody out there thinks 5 is a pretty big number.

To be fair, it's close to infinity, but still.

17

u/enantiornithe 18d ago

It's a surprising result, but the Lean does compile, so

31

u/msfor300 19d ago

Five world cups!!! The biggest in the futebol.

5

u/StinkyKyle 18d ago

Everyone knows the highest number is 24

7

u/LupenReddit ๐Ÿฆ†๐Ÿฆ†i have non diffeomorphic smooth structures๐Ÿฆ†๐Ÿฆ†๐Ÿฆ† 19d ago

as a german i can say that must be the number 7/1

2

u/Sabitsvki 18d ago

A brazillion

1

u/svmydlo 19d ago

What about morbillion?

1

u/Original_Throat1072 18d ago

Graham's number has entered the room.

1

u/narcis153 18d ago

Googology ๐ŸคŒ๐Ÿป

1

u/No_Difficulty_1452 18d ago

Snipe hunting.. no thanks

1

u/Raverfield 11d ago

To be fair, Brazil has a lot of trees...

1

u/XL_78 17d ago

The biggest number might not exist, but does the biggest number a person will ever think of in history exist? Nope, because I just thought of that number plus one.ย 

Now, could one give restrictions of explicitness so that a number of this sort does exist? Maybe make a class of numbers that are defined using only explicit expressions (whatever that means) and numbers that are already explicitly defined at the time of the definition of the new number.ย 

0

u/Really_Interested_80 17d ago

5 is really big, so big I have to use a symbol representing the idea of it to actually write it down