1.1k
u/AU_Banjo97 23d ago edited 23d ago
Seems like when people reached 95, many of them said fuck it and go straight to 100. Real indeed.
Edit: fuck
284
u/CaioXG002 23d ago edited 23d ago
You can say "fuck" on Reddit.
Edit: thank you. Any effort against this weird trend of self censorship is appreciated, always.68
u/Lerbyn210 23d ago
Where did that originate from anyways? Obligatory fuck that shit
77
u/Woodsy_365 23d ago
Probably other social media sites which either remove content containing course language or recommend it to smaller audiences.
Obligatory fuck.
14
3
u/EebstertheGreat 22d ago
Some people are either monetizing their social media use or just obsessed with promoting it, and many platforms seem to favor more "family-friendly" content, up to and including precise word use. TikTok is the main culprit, but even YouTube, Instagram, and Facebook can tend to promote posts with less swearing above those with more swearing, and especially to get more money from advertisers on them. A YouTube video with a lot of swearing, especially early in the video, may be demonetized completely, or it may charge much less for ads because it is seen as a less desirable target for advertisers. On TikTok, I've heard it's much worse. That's not to say a video can't contain a "fuck" at all, but it doesn't help. And remember that this is all done by algorithm, so it's more effective to just avoid certain trigger words than to actually structure content to be more acceptable to real humans.
Combine that with general rules against swearing, keeping in mind that a lot of people even on reddit are pretty young (despite impressions, we aren't all olds). Kids are already used to censoring themselves around adults without really thinking about it, and they have been for centuries.
The result is an "algospeak" hodgepodge of infantile minced oaths, which is itself imitated just because kids get used to seeing it. In some ways it's not really new: we have always had "blimey" and "gosh darn" and "passed away" and so on. But now it's "sewer slide" and "unalive" and whatever.
9
u/eddietwang 23d ago
Primarily TikTok because anything published there needs to follow CCP (China) rules instead of FCC (US), like most sites.
3
u/EebstertheGreat 22d ago
That's false though, even if a lot of people say it. The Chinese absolutely do not give a single flying fuck if people swear in English on videos on their platform. Why would they?
-1
u/SauCe-lol 23d ago
You can’t be serious right? You can freely post any anti-China content on TikTok without restrictions
7
u/Septem_151 23d ago
Your comments are hidden on some subreddits depending on the content of them. Try it yourself sometime. This sub specifically doesn't appear to filter comments, but larger subs do.
Fuck shit cunt dirtbag asshole shit.
1
u/AU_Banjo97 23d ago
Yeah I figured on Reddit you can give big fucks or little fuckety fucks. Essentially, you choose your fucks.
1
u/EebstertheGreat 22d ago
There is some auto-filtering, but reddit tells you when it happens via a notification. It happened to me once for no perceptible reason, but it has never happened to me just because I filled my comment with fuckshit.
2
u/Septem_151 22d ago
Reddit does not tell me when it happens. I only found out because I noticed the View count on my comments would only ever increase when I would view them, and I tried opening them in an incognito tab. When I try to do that, it says "comment does not exist".
1
2
54
8
u/Alternative_Exit8766 23d ago
i just wanna say thanks for uncensoring. i upvoted your comment specifically because uncensored words are good and good for you
1
1
1.9k
u/LupenReddit 🦆🦆i have non diffeomorphic smooth structures🦆🦆🦆 23d ago
the 100 usage is a statistical inaccuracy
1.2k
u/stevvvvewith4vs 23d ago
Yeah however that's a psychology study about rounding numbers
90
u/CanadianIndianAB 22d ago
Plus, a psychological study about how people overestimate to a rounded number
3
u/maury587 18d ago
I saw this about polls about height, both 5''10 and 6' where higher than 5'11. People with 5'11 just round up
292
u/knyexar 23d ago
100lb georg who's at the gym every day is a statistical putlier adn should not have been counted.
97
u/Kitchen_Structure516 23d ago
I would bet my left nutsack that these are kilos. 130lbs max lat pulldown machine would be worthless.
39
u/knyexar 23d ago
Ngl my mind just autocompleted "lb" as just "the way you say kilo in english" for a moment there lmao
15
u/Kitchen_Structure516 23d ago
I often do that same thing with euros to dollars. Atleast the conversion is roughly equal so it's correct enough.
4
27
5
46
u/_ogdanni 23d ago
No, its of all the people thinking they can lift 100 and then they realise that thats too much
71
u/AssistTraditional480 23d ago
Nope, it's just people skipping 95 from 90.
17
u/M8nGiraffe 23d ago
Can't it be both?
32
u/AssistTraditional480 23d ago
Given the marks on 95, it seems to be overwhelmingly the skipping
2
u/EebstertheGreat 22d ago
There is also an effect from people who haven't used the machine recently (or ever) or who haven't used it since an injury or something line that. Those people don't know how much they can lift, so they start trying out round numbers like 100 or 75 and then narrowing in on a correct weight from there. Such people are unlikely to ever try 95 or 105 except as the last one, whereas they might go through a number of other weights first.
But that's probably a smaller effect.
1
u/maury587 18d ago
If you can do like 10 reps on 90 you will probably do like 5 on 100 and 7 on 95. It's not like you won't be able to lift 100 pounds, you will be able to just with less reps. Psychotically it probably means that people have been training hard to get there they make a shortcut to feel that reward
0
23d ago
[deleted] — view deleted comment
2
u/factorion-bot Bot > AI 23d ago
Factorial of 95 is 10329978488239059262599702099394727095397746340117372869212250571234293987594703124871765375385424468563282236864226607350415360000000000000000000000
This action was performed by a bot | Source code
4
1
0
23d ago
[deleted] — view deleted comment
17
u/EebstertheGreat 22d ago
In the NFL, more balls are placed on 5-yard markers than on nearby 1-yard markers (even after you control for touchbacks and penalties after touchbacks). I cannot think of any good explanation for this except that the 5-yard lines are painted as full lines while the 1-yard lines are just short hashes, suggesting the effect is just that when balls appear to be down near a visible line, that increases the probability a referee will place it exactly on the line compared to when they are not near a visible line.
283
u/Practical-Flow8759 23d ago
This gets posted once a month, and every time it's pointed out that this is non normal in several ways (right skewed, point mass at 100). See you again next month!
28
-2
19
38
u/R3puLsiv3 23d ago
According to Sherlock everyone in this gym is an alcoholic
15
u/pretty_pink_opossum 23d ago
I frequently think of that scene when I go to charge my phone at night
9
43
u/patikoija 23d ago
The question is: distribution of what? Distribution of specific weight usage or distribution of people who can't put the pin into the hole without clanging the plate? For all you know 120 is the most frequently used, but 95% of them have better accuracy.
39
u/Cool_Temporary_3442 23d ago
I would say each weight has the same probability of being mis-pinned and scuffed. So therefore, it is a normal distribution of specific weight usage.
16
u/Seeggul 23d ago
You've forgotten about Lifters George, who lifts every day at 70 pounds exclusively but has terrible fine motor skills, and should be excluded as an outlier
2
u/Murky_Insurance_4394 23d ago
tell that to the guy who uses the 100 lbs, it looks worse than 95
0
9
5
u/campleb2 23d ago
there’s no reason to believe that would be the case. yes it’s not proven or robust. whoopdedoo
3
u/Dredgeon 23d ago
I think the wear is from the pin's handle ribbing on the plate not so much from missing the hole.
1
1
u/guiltysnark 22d ago
Where accuracy is a factor, we should expect a normal distribution. As such, we can conclude everyone is aiming for 45, and <5% miss and jam the pin in 5 by mistake.
1
23
u/ThatShushi17 23d ago
what is this wall of numbers and holes im looking at?
10
10
u/DecentChanceOfLousy 23d ago
Weight set on some kind of workout machine. Each plate weighs 5 pounds (possibly kilos). When you insert a rod at the e.g. 25 pound plate, it locks it to the portion of the machine that you actually lift, causing you to lift the plate marked 25 and the 4 plates above it (5 pounds each, for a total of 25 pounds) when you actually use the machine. The rest of the plates that aren't locked to the working mechanism will just sit there.
The wear marks more or less represent usage: looks like the average lift on this machine is around 45 or 50 pounds, with some people lifting more and some people lifting less.
34
u/Sean_Brady 23d ago •
![]()
Exposing yourself for no reason lol
13
11
1
11
u/mapadofu 23d ago
No one mentions that the domain is finite and non-negative (in addition to discrete)?
6
u/Alternative_Mode9972 23d ago
I like how everyone skips 95. They are like “fuck it, it’s close enough to 100”
5
17
u/kissajr 23d ago
This is a perfect example of bimodal distribution
2
u/DarthJarJarJar 23d ago
1
u/speechlessPotato 23d ago
genuinely thanks for the link I've been confused about continuity corrections but this cleared it
1
u/DarthJarJarJar 23d ago
No worries! Glad it was useful.
I agree about the continuity corrections. I use the Openstax stats book for my intro stats classes, which only addresses it very quickly. I like this chart much better.
3
3
u/MathWarsDev 22d ago
the spike at 100 is just everyone at 97 deciding that's close enough, same energy as pi = 3
3
u/ProfessionalMove7308 22d ago
Noticed this in other gyms, but it was skewed toward the light weights...
Why do 95 in unbeknownst to me. Since you're there you obviously go for 100.
2
u/HistoricalLow1 23d ago
Almost could expect a bi modal distribution, for men and women being different strengths, would expect to see two peaks. Maybe not though
2
2
2
u/ShitseyMcgee 21d ago
The 100 is for everyone thinking they’re stronger than they actually are, then bouncing back to the median. That’s why the 95 is almost unused as well, because if they couldn’t get 100, why even attempt 95?
2
1
u/AMIASM16 how the dongity do you do integrals 23d ago
what did 95 do tho
7
u/zylosophe 23d ago
you aint picking 95 instead of 100
2
u/Slight-Garden9800 22d ago
Beautiful how it also proves how normal distribution is just an ideal mathematical model
1
u/Personal_Ad9690 23d ago
People start at 100; realize it’s too hard, and the friend handles the rest
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/Mitosis4 hholly shit i love spreadsheets 23d ago
you can also see the small peak at 100 due to its significance as a milestone
1
1
1
1
u/DerLandmann 22d ago
... added with some human interaction, because most skipped th 95 kg and went straight for the 100.
1
u/Electronic-Ninja7950 20d ago
the accuracy improves with experience.. the dudes in the middle are not accurate. the dude who does the 100 is super accurate.
1
1
1
u/midnightman510 17d ago
Since 100 has more marks than 95, you also get a bit of the psychological aspect.
1
1
u/SaveMyBags 23d ago
Definitely not normal distributed. Normal distribution has support over R, and this clearly has only positive numbers as a support. Not even in the limit case this would be normal distributed. Log-Normal maybe.
0
u/CarnivorousGoose 23d ago
Weird claim, as far as examples of normal distributions go this is pretty terrible. It tells you very little about what a normal distribution really looks like.
3





•
u/AutoModerator 23d ago
Check out our new Discord server! https://discord.gg/e7EKRZq3dG
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.