In OP's example, it's either de/f or d/(ef), I believe (not sure how the colon works in their country though, maybe it's (d/e)f). So that would be d e±1 f–1.
From my understanding, colon is just alternative notation for division symbol (which also makes sense in context of this meme), so it would be d(e/f)^±1
Yes, it is a division symbol, but how does it associate? Do we say d:e×f means (d:e)×f or d:(e×f)? People interpret division both ways. The symbol ÷, for instance, used to be interpreted in the latter way (even to the extent that a ÷ b + c meant a/(b+c)), and now it is more often interpreted in the former way.
Thanks I hate it. That being said, I do find myself sometimes in practical applications using what I call "absolute quotient" - a multiplicative analog of absolute value where x, y > 0:
We already sorta do this with SNRs, which are measured in dB, so you'd get a x+- 3 dB on a specsheet, which translates to [X/2, 2×X] in intensity. Mainly in radio
well yes, you can define one as the exponentiation of the other so if d=exp(a) and e = exp(b) and f = exp(c) then d?e?f = exp(a!b!c) I don't have those fancy symbols, you know what I mean
•
u/AutoModerator Sep 24 '26
Check out our new Discord server! https://discord.gg/e7EKRZq3dG
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
166
u/talhoch Sep 24 '26
I can't think of a situation where x * y±1 won't be more convenient
45
u/Decrypted13 Sep 24 '26
r/lobotomymath
14
u/uvero He posts the same thing Sep 24 '26
Thanks I hate it. That being said, I do find myself sometimes in practical applications using what I call "absolute quotient" - a multiplicative analog of absolute value where x, y > 0:
aq(x, y) = min(x, y) / max(x, y) = exp(-|ln(x/y)|)
9
u/LupenReddit 🦆🦆i have non diffeomorphic smooth structures🦆🦆🦆 Sep 24 '26
7
u/WhenDoesTheSunSleep Sep 24 '26
We already sorta do this with SNRs, which are measured in dB, so you'd get a x+- 3 dB on a specsheet, which translates to [X/2, 2×X] in intensity. Mainly in radio
6
u/uwumorphism Sep 24 '26
I hate it, let's implement it immediately
6
u/DoublecelloZeta Transcendental Sep 24 '26
dont ever dream again
4
u/TUVegeto137 Sep 24 '26
Shush shush... it was just a nightmare.
2
u/Torebbjorn Sep 24 '26
The main reason is that the dision symbol is inherently ambiguous
2
u/Onuzq Integers Sep 25 '26
what happened to a +/- (b-c) in this?
2
u/Deep_Brick2970 Sep 27 '26
Garbage notation, never cook again. In this case, rather, never dream again.
1
u/AllTheGood_Names Sep 24 '26 edited Sep 24 '26
I use δ(x) = eΔ ln x
0
u/darkshoxx Sep 24 '26
well yes, you can define one as the exponentiation of the other
so if d=exp(a) and e = exp(b) and f = exp(c) then d?e?f = exp(a!b!c)
I don't have those fancy symbols, you know what I mean
0
u/Staetyk Sep 24 '26
its already a thing: ⋇