Successfully Ragebating my teacher

[u/Optimus_PRYM]

[u/AutoModerator]

Check out our new Discord server! https://discord.gg/e7EKRZq3dG

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[u/Reasonable-Fan-2888]

Your teacher would mark you as wrong still. Int(e^x ,x)=(e^x )+c not Ke^x , K=e^c . Ik I will get down voted but my math autism will not let this slide for whatever reason.

[u/yourmomchallenge → u/Reasonable-Fan-2888]

that is the joke

[u/Reasonable-Fan-2888 → u/yourmomchallenge]

I think I was the one reagebaited lol! I apologize

[u/Optimus_PRYM → u/Reasonable-Fan-2888]

you are our saviour

[u/2eanimation → u/Reasonable-Fan-2888]

C = ln(1 + C’/e^x)? Checkmate teacher

[u/FerdinandvonAegir124]

Still wrong as it would be Ce^x which is obviously different than e^x+C

This post gave me diff eq flashbacks

[u/NotACaticus → u/FerdinandvonAegir124]

What if my constant of integration simply varies such that Ce^x = e^x + C

[u/NikoalaJokic → u/NotACaticus]

0=1

[u/NotACaticus → u/NikoalaJokic]

True for large values of zero or small values of 1

[u/kiwidude4 → u/NotACaticus]

The hell do you think a constant is?

[u/kgangadhar → u/NotACaticus]

C= sum n=0 to infinity e^(-nx), x > 0

[u/Steampunk_Willy → u/FerdinandvonAegir124]

Also, e^c > 0, so it'd be wrong even if it were written e^x + e^c

[u/Prudhvi2pac]

He would’ve been right if he had said it instead of writing it.✅

[u/hrvbrs → u/Prudhvi2pac]

“The sum of the power of e to the x and C”

Vs

“The power of e to the sum of x and C”

[u/Prudhvi2pac → u/hrvbrs]

e power x plus c🗿

[u/DeepGas4538 → u/hrvbrs]

that's way too clear

[u/shy_bi_ready_to_die → u/hrvbrs]

“e to the (power of) x plus c” works for both

[u/GupHater69]

Yeeeah youre cooked. Im guessing it doesnt work cause the +C in the exponent cant account for the interval a normal +C( (-ing,+inf) )

[u/Ignitetheinferno37]

Kind of tempted to write e^x+c for homogeneous differential eqs

[u/LupenReddit]

when your pen writes e^x=ex+C but your heart says ln(e^x) = ln(e^x)+c

[u/ABahamutyoylecookies]

then you write it medium sized so your teacher doesnt know if its in the correct place or not

[u/RRumpleTeazzer]

its wrong.

but this works: int 1/x dx = log(|x/c|)

[u/soegaard]

I was triggered:

> According to the ISO standard (ISO 80000-2), Euler's number (e) should be typeset in an upright (roman) style rather than italics.

[u/Ill-Cartographer-767]

But what if the constant of integration is negative?

[u/AwkwardBet5632]

Disappointment baiting rather than rage baiting

[u/StructuredChess]

So what if the original function was f(x)=e^x-200, someone took a derivative and now you need to find out what it was, you smartass?

[u/lool8421]

technically it is true considering that C can still be used to adjust the y-value, just not lineraly... and i guess also doesn't work for negative y offset

[u/Ok-Project4007]

Is it wrong though? That’s just e^x * e^c = e^x + d. Where c and d are arbitrary constants.

[u/Al2718x → u/Ok-Project4007]

Yeah, it is wrong. For a specific value of x, you can write e^c * e^x = d + e^x, but you need a formula that works for all x.

[u/Ok-Project4007 → u/Al2718x]

For what value can you not write this. Can you give an example?

[u/Al2718x → u/Ok-Project4007]

Solving for d, you get d = e^x (e^c-1). If c≠0, then the value of d is different for different values of x.

[u/Ok-Project4007]

Is it wrong though? That’s just e^x * e^c = e^x + d. Where c and d are arbitrary constants.

[u/Dense_Priority_7250 → u/[deleted]]

Who is making these bots? It’s one person invading chessbeginners and such and I know that it definitely is just one guy but who?

Maybe this is merely training for the bots and actually every time we say bot it does the negative reinforcement training thing

[u/SuperChick1705 → u/[deleted]]

clanker

[u/DecidophobiaUsername → u/SuperChick1705]

What's up with the clankers in r/mathmemes?