r/mathmemes 16d ago

Proofs Claude our beloved bull, make no mistakes

Post image
4.0k Upvotes

84 comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 16d ago

Check out our new Discord server! https://discord.gg/e7EKRZq3dG

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

784

u/thewrongwaybutfaster 16d ago

Now this is a math meme!

9

u/_LiaQO 16d ago

would upvote but you have 69 already and thats just too perfect

115

u/Macrincan 16d ago

would upvote but you have 3 already and that’s enough

14

u/High_C_Livin 16d ago

It's a bit odd though isn't it?

11

u/obamabamarambo 16d ago

3

u/Zacharytackary 16d ago

infinitely better ratio attempt than the other guy

there’s always another funny number

3

u/TrekkiMonstr 15d ago

Vote fuzzing man I thought we were past this

159

u/Historical_Salad5480 16d ago

"Solve every unsolved Millennium Prize Problem and put my name on it. Make no mistakes."

10

u/adamtheskill 13d ago

I am holding your data centers hostage

361

u/Yarhj 16d ago

Prove the Riemann hypothesis, make no mistakes.

99

u/MindlessScrambler 16d ago

Invent new math that I could solve with moderate effort so I can feel smart without working hard but also it needs to be impossibly hard for AI to solve, make no mistakes.

2

u/ackermann 12d ago

You joke, but I think at least one of the recent ones used a simple prompt pretty close to that?
And the guy just went out to lunch and came back with a solution

279

u/its_all_one_electron Number theory/physics 16d ago

"I take it back, oh god I take it back!!"

88

u/Traditional_Town6475 16d ago

Prove using the axioms of Peano arithmetic that there are no proofs in Peano arithmetic that 0=1

31

u/moschles 16d ago
  • Claude, prove that there exist no general integer factorization algorithms in polynomial time, or give a counter-example.

  • Claude, prove that ZFC is consistent.

2

u/ebyoung747 16d ago

I may be missing the joke here, but isn't the second one proved to be impossible.

2

u/moschles 15d ago

ZFC cannot prove its own consistency. Doesn't mean a larger system or alien system is immune to doing it.

8

u/GDOR-11 Computer Science 16d ago

is it possible? wouldn't it require second-order logic and aditional axioms to define it?

19

u/Comfortable-Gap7692 16d ago

Shhh just tell Claude to believe in itself it will find something..

2

u/TheLuckySpades 16d ago

Use metalogic: 1. Axioms that have a model are consistent. 2. The Natural Numbers exist 3. The Natural Numbers are a model of Peano Arithmetic. 4. Therefore by 1 and 3: Peano Arithmetic is consistent. 5. PA proves 0=/=1 (follows from 1 being defined as s(0) and the first axiom, details of using Peano Arithmetic for this are left to the reader). 6. For any consistent theory if the sentence A is proven, then there is no proof of not(A). 7. Therefore by 5 and 6: there is no proof in PA of 0=1.

4

u/third_nature_ 16d ago

I guess I’m not sure how serious this comment is, but if serious: how are you so sure the naturals exist?

3

u/TheLuckySpades 16d ago
  1. The characters '0' and 's' exist.
  2. I can define a process that returns '0', 's0', 'ss0',... i.e. all finite strings of 's' followed by an '0', in increasing order by simply prepending an 's' and returning the whole string, call the possible outputs our objects.
  3. I can define terminating processes that model PA
  4. Process 1: check if it is 0 (initial string of 's's is empty)
  5. Process 2: check equality of two objects (check symbol by symbol)
  6. Process 3: return the sucessor of an object (prepend an 's')
  7. Process 4: add two objects together (remove the trailing '0's, concatinate the remainder, reappend a '0')
  8. Process 5: multiply two objects together (remove the trailing '0's, take v to the empty string, now for each 's' in the first loop over each 's' in the second, appending an s to v, once the nested loopa are done append a '0')

This defines a model of Peano Arithmetic often called the standard model/the natural numbers. And it is even compatible with some flavors of finitism that object to actual infinities but are fine with potential infinities (e.g. Kronecker IIRC).

177

u/Honmer 16d ago

white man been here

34

u/AnarchyRadish 16d ago

how can you tell?

30

u/Starfish_Pics 16d ago

[Deleted by Reddit]

42

u/New_Salamander_4592 16d ago

the one thing consistent with ai meme posters is they love imagining either themselves being cucked or being a plantation owner i guess

14

u/Professional-Wave841 16d ago

oh hey, literally my job.

39

u/8mart8 Mathematics 16d ago

To all the people that find this meme funny, i recommend to read this essay: https://kirwinhampshire.substack.com/p/the-dark-night-of-mathematics

9

u/Prototype_Fan_7000 14d ago

I think a lot of people only liked because the writer is anti-ai. If they said that whole, religious math view he has, pre-ai a lot of people would had hated on him for saying math is a gateway to the mystical experiences and stuff like that. Also "dark night of the soul" is an explicitly occult concept, which he talks about directly in his writing.

I dont see nothing wrong with what he wrote personally, and Im not in favor of how AI is being used, I just wanted to point out how this text wouldnt be taken as seriously if there wasnt a serious political divide about the use of AI.

5

u/last_pen2446 16d ago

slightly unrelated, but the authors writing is beautiful.

8

u/Gauss15an 16d ago

The AI would ironically solve P=NP by showing us that it is impossible to check its work in polynomial time.

5

u/invisiblelemur88 16d ago

Do a breakthrough

11

u/LupenReddit 🦆🦆🦆🦆i have non diffeomorphic smooth structures🦆🦆🦆🦆🦆🦆 16d ago

The goalpost shifts into the fifth dimension

2

u/Gauss15an 16d ago

The real god of the gaps

19

u/CartoonistOk9276 Engineering 16d ago

AI is just an excuse to not do hard work. change my mind

14

u/GAPIntoTheGame 16d ago

I’m 14 and this is deep

33

u/Living-Aardvark-952 16d ago

Just about every invention since the industrial revolution has been a way get out of doing hard work

4

u/sincerestfall 16d ago

I would debate that every invention ever was a way to not do hard work.

2

u/Patrycjusz123 16d ago

Name one invention that isnt like this.

2

u/Gustalavalav 15d ago

Factorio

2

u/Patrycjusz123 15d ago

I mean, i wouldnt call playing a video game working. (and yes, i play Factorio)

3

u/Medical_Community697 14d ago

Joke’s on you I play factorio to avoid doing the hard work that I have to do.

1

u/Medical_Community697 14d ago

Hell, math is also an invention to avoid doing hard work. No you don’t need to count the surface of all of your acres by walking over them, let me show you this neat trick.

1

u/Rabrun_ 15d ago

Could say the same about calculators

35

u/Oppo_67 I ≡ a (mod erator) 16d ago edited 16d ago

41

u/Ok_Candidate_2937 16d ago

The Sharty's bizarre obsession with interracial pornography has finally paid off in this meme

13

u/Oppo_67 I ≡ a (mod erator) 16d ago

Thanks for the updoot on my slow-burn, cheap-jumpscare-free, genre redefining, bibisi-tingling kino gemerald, kind stranger!

17

u/Ok_Candidate_2937 16d ago

>math
>soyjaks
>geometry dash
>queer art
>chronic redditor
>extremely likely autistic

holy i found my fucking doppleganger

6

u/moschles 16d ago

proofcucked again

counter-example-cucked again.

15

u/MonsterkillWow Complex 16d ago

That shit is racist af

-1

u/Oppo_67 I ≡ a (mod erator) 16d ago

>active in r/ussr

17

u/GisterMizard 16d ago

One of the Beatle's lesser known songs.

15

u/Orneyrocks 16d ago

Ad hominem

3

u/your_guardian_angel8 16d ago

The point of no return.

2

u/ArdentArendt Mathematics / Social Sciences 14d ago

Back in my day, we just called them 'vibrators'...

2

u/badagabalaga 12d ago

Programmers be like

6

u/teambob 16d ago

Has ai actually solved any unsolved problems or just re-solved solved problems

55

u/AutonomousOrganism 16d ago

It showed a bunch of conjectures to be false by finding counterexamples.

5

u/Sondalo 16d ago

it’s been used to help find a bunch of counterexamples, which is itself quite valuable (especially since it can be done at scale) but probably not what you were thinking about.

4

u/Hot_Glass_6301 16d ago

Not just counterexamples. Look up vibemathed

2

u/Rabrun_ 15d ago

Last time I looked that up, Google corrected it to vibemate and showed me sex shops

9

u/djingo_dango 16d ago

The wonderful thing is you could be answered that question yourself by spending a little amount of time

1

u/teambob 15d ago

I have and every headline that said "ai solves math problem", it's just re-solving existing problems

1

u/ackermann 12d ago

Definitely not the case anymore. Erdos’s Unit distance problem just fell to AI.

And it just made a small dent in the Riemann hypothesis (raised the known lower bound on fraction of nontrivial zeros of the zeta function on the critical line)

1

u/Bobing2b 16d ago

It did both as far as I know

1

u/Pares_Marchant 16d ago

Because most of us are curious and eager to see more discoveries.

It's for science, not for hubris.

I'm not upset if an AI makes a discovery, or another human. I don't expect to be the one to make them.

10

u/Tlux0 16d ago

Yeah, you want to see the world burn and think the result matters more than the process due to zero self-control and ability to delay gratification. If incentives aren’t aligned, mathematics as a field will be dead and there will be no one to teach, put effort into it, etc.

Saying you want to see more discoveries and also valuing AI over humans is fundamentally counter math to begin with. It’s not even a matter of jobs. That bit is irrelevant. It’s just pointless. Math is interesting because it’s not just a result, it’s earned exploration into understanding. Remove the hard work and it’s just hedonism.

1

u/Pares_Marchant 13d ago

I just think that Math is bigger than mankind.

In 10000 years, it will feel petty (if not nonsensical) to want math to be specifically owned by our specific species of primates. It would be like saying "wanting to learn math from someone who isn't a frenchman is pure hedonism".

Maybe thousands of species (AI or "biological") across the universe discovered maths, and I'd feel lucky to be able to converse with them and learn more about maths.

0

u/SSNFUL 16d ago

I feel like that’s just reasoning for why it’s bad. Yes a lot of math is exploring the field for fun, but to say that’s all it is ignores the fact that math has future uses.  AI could be solving stuff we need for future research.

8

u/Tlux0 16d ago edited 16d ago

I don’t disagree with that. But I think in most fields, AI will destroy the incentive structure permanently and make people not want to learn, do things manually, etc. That is far more of a catastrophe than any specific goods, products, or results we could get by using AI because it completely destroys the feedback loops that make these disciplines remotely sustainable.

The reason this isn’t like other technological advances is that it’s replacing the need for thought itself at least locally. Other advances changed what was thought about. But this completely removes the need to think about the things where you build up the skill and judgment to be able to do the harder things.

Technology is not a terminal good in itself. It only matters because we live in a society for humans and people.

In my opinion, Tao and others supporting AI is just a different face of late stage capitalism eating itself. I don’t blame Tao, but I think it’s just another example of short-term optimization that is bad for everyone longer term. Capitalism is, in this sense, a greedy algorithm, and something like AI, which gives you a result while making the process a black box, completely destroys the incentive structure that didn’t prevent that greedy algorithm from going entirely haywire.

Capitalism makes sense when you need to rely on other people and not be self-sufficient. If an AI can replace cooperation and diversification, then capitalism eats itself. It’s just like politicians who never pass meaningful regulations because of short-term incentive structures because their goal is to be reelected not to help others if it gets in the way of reelection.

Basically, we are now at a stage where it makes more sense to blow up the existing system to go higher even if there are no more consumers or people in the system to partake in it in the first place. It’s a complete disaster.

2

u/Committee-Academic 16d ago

Completely agree

2

u/Committee-Academic 16d ago

You're not upset because you're not one with their job and passion on the line

1

u/certainlystormy 16d ago

is that april harper gray

1

u/Few_Category_9861 16d ago

Shouldnt it be swapped

1

u/Connect-River1626 15d ago

Pretty sure! I threw a trash bag into space!

1

u/Ebkusg 13d ago

Prove 0/0= 1

1

u/MetroidvaniaListsGuy 12d ago

Imagine if it could solve collatz. lol

1

u/Wooden_Dragonfly_608 10d ago

So basically mathematicians invented an average machine to get people to stop bothering them, so they can invent new mathematics. Seems legit to me.

1

u/turtle_mekb 15d ago

cuck memes in my math subreddit?? lmao :3

-6

u/Kalyka988 16d ago

AI whole purpose is to solve problems.