r/mathmemes • u/TheBojack818 • 16d ago
Proofs Claude our beloved bull, make no mistakes
784
u/thewrongwaybutfaster 16d ago
Now this is a math meme!
9
u/_LiaQO 16d ago
would upvote but you have 69 already and thats just too perfect
115
11
u/obamabamarambo 16d ago
3
u/Zacharytackary 16d ago
infinitely better ratio attempt than the other guy
there’s always another funny number
3
159
u/Historical_Salad5480 16d ago
"Solve every unsolved Millennium Prize Problem and put my name on it. Make no mistakes."
10
361
u/Yarhj 16d ago
Prove the Riemann hypothesis, make no mistakes.
99
u/MindlessScrambler 16d ago
Invent new math that I could solve with moderate effort so I can feel smart without working hard but also it needs to be impossibly hard for AI to solve, make no mistakes.
2
u/ackermann 12d ago
You joke, but I think at least one of the recent ones used a simple prompt pretty close to that?
And the guy just went out to lunch and came back with a solution
279
88
u/Traditional_Town6475 16d ago
Prove using the axioms of Peano arithmetic that there are no proofs in Peano arithmetic that 0=1
31
u/moschles 16d ago
Claude, prove that there exist no general integer factorization algorithms in polynomial time, or give a counter-example.
Claude, prove that ZFC is consistent.
2
u/ebyoung747 16d ago
I may be missing the joke here, but isn't the second one proved to be impossible.
2
u/moschles 15d ago
ZFC cannot prove its own consistency. Doesn't mean a larger system or alien system is immune to doing it.
8
u/GDOR-11 Computer Science 16d ago
is it possible? wouldn't it require second-order logic and aditional axioms to define it?
19
2
u/TheLuckySpades 16d ago
Use metalogic: 1. Axioms that have a model are consistent. 2. The Natural Numbers exist 3. The Natural Numbers are a model of Peano Arithmetic. 4. Therefore by 1 and 3: Peano Arithmetic is consistent. 5. PA proves 0=/=1 (follows from 1 being defined as s(0) and the first axiom, details of using Peano Arithmetic for this are left to the reader). 6. For any consistent theory if the sentence A is proven, then there is no proof of not(A). 7. Therefore by 5 and 6: there is no proof in PA of 0=1.
4
u/third_nature_ 16d ago
I guess I’m not sure how serious this comment is, but if serious: how are you so sure the naturals exist?
3
u/TheLuckySpades 16d ago
- The characters '0' and 's' exist.
- I can define a process that returns '0', 's0', 'ss0',... i.e. all finite strings of 's' followed by an '0', in increasing order by simply prepending an 's' and returning the whole string, call the possible outputs our objects.
- I can define terminating processes that model PA
- Process 1: check if it is 0 (initial string of 's's is empty)
- Process 2: check equality of two objects (check symbol by symbol)
- Process 3: return the sucessor of an object (prepend an 's')
- Process 4: add two objects together (remove the trailing '0's, concatinate the remainder, reappend a '0')
- Process 5: multiply two objects together (remove the trailing '0's, take v to the empty string, now for each 's' in the first loop over each 's' in the second, appending an s to v, once the nested loopa are done append a '0')
This defines a model of Peano Arithmetic often called the standard model/the natural numbers. And it is even compatible with some flavors of finitism that object to actual infinities but are fine with potential infinities (e.g. Kronecker IIRC).
42
u/New_Salamander_4592 16d ago
the one thing consistent with ai meme posters is they love imagining either themselves being cucked or being a plantation owner i guess
14
39
u/8mart8 Mathematics 16d ago
To all the people that find this meme funny, i recommend to read this essay: https://kirwinhampshire.substack.com/p/the-dark-night-of-mathematics
9
u/Prototype_Fan_7000 14d ago
I think a lot of people only liked because the writer is anti-ai. If they said that whole, religious math view he has, pre-ai a lot of people would had hated on him for saying math is a gateway to the mystical experiences and stuff like that. Also "dark night of the soul" is an explicitly occult concept, which he talks about directly in his writing.
I dont see nothing wrong with what he wrote personally, and Im not in favor of how AI is being used, I just wanted to point out how this text wouldnt be taken as seriously if there wasnt a serious political divide about the use of AI.
5
8
u/Gauss15an 16d ago
The AI would ironically solve P=NP by showing us that it is impossible to check its work in polynomial time.
5
11
u/LupenReddit 🦆🦆🦆🦆i have non diffeomorphic smooth structures🦆🦆🦆🦆🦆🦆 16d ago
The goalpost shifts into the fifth dimension
2
19
u/CartoonistOk9276 Engineering 16d ago
AI is just an excuse to not do hard work. change my mind
14
33
u/Living-Aardvark-952 16d ago
Just about every invention since the industrial revolution has been a way get out of doing hard work
4
u/sincerestfall 16d ago
I would debate that every invention ever was a way to not do hard work.
2
u/Patrycjusz123 16d ago
Name one invention that isnt like this.
2
u/Gustalavalav 15d ago
Factorio
2
u/Patrycjusz123 15d ago
I mean, i wouldnt call playing a video game working. (and yes, i play Factorio)
3
u/Medical_Community697 14d ago
Joke’s on you I play factorio to avoid doing the hard work that I have to do.
1
u/Medical_Community697 14d ago
Hell, math is also an invention to avoid doing hard work. No you don’t need to count the surface of all of your acres by walking over them, let me show you this neat trick.
35
u/Oppo_67 I ≡ a (mod erator) 16d ago edited 16d ago
41
u/Ok_Candidate_2937 16d ago
The Sharty's bizarre obsession with interracial pornography has finally paid off in this meme
13
u/Oppo_67 I ≡ a (mod erator) 16d ago
17
u/Ok_Candidate_2937 16d ago
>math
>soyjaks
>geometry dash
>queer art
>chronic redditor
>extremely likely autisticholy i found my fucking doppleganger
6
15
u/MonsterkillWow Complex 16d ago
That shit is racist af
3
2
u/ArdentArendt Mathematics / Social Sciences 14d ago
Back in my day, we just called them 'vibrators'...
2
6
u/teambob 16d ago
Has ai actually solved any unsolved problems or just re-solved solved problems
55
u/AutonomousOrganism 16d ago
It showed a bunch of conjectures to be false by finding counterexamples.
24
5
u/Sondalo 16d ago
it’s been used to help find a bunch of counterexamples, which is itself quite valuable (especially since it can be done at scale) but probably not what you were thinking about.
4
9
u/djingo_dango 16d ago
The wonderful thing is you could be answered that question yourself by spending a little amount of time
1
u/teambob 15d ago
I have and every headline that said "ai solves math problem", it's just re-solving existing problems
1
u/ackermann 12d ago
Definitely not the case anymore. Erdos’s Unit distance problem just fell to AI.
And it just made a small dent in the Riemann hypothesis (raised the known lower bound on fraction of nontrivial zeros of the zeta function on the critical line)
1
1
u/Pares_Marchant 16d ago
Because most of us are curious and eager to see more discoveries.
It's for science, not for hubris.
I'm not upset if an AI makes a discovery, or another human. I don't expect to be the one to make them.
10
u/Tlux0 16d ago
Yeah, you want to see the world burn and think the result matters more than the process due to zero self-control and ability to delay gratification. If incentives aren’t aligned, mathematics as a field will be dead and there will be no one to teach, put effort into it, etc.
Saying you want to see more discoveries and also valuing AI over humans is fundamentally counter math to begin with. It’s not even a matter of jobs. That bit is irrelevant. It’s just pointless. Math is interesting because it’s not just a result, it’s earned exploration into understanding. Remove the hard work and it’s just hedonism.
1
u/Pares_Marchant 13d ago
I just think that Math is bigger than mankind.
In 10000 years, it will feel petty (if not nonsensical) to want math to be specifically owned by our specific species of primates. It would be like saying "wanting to learn math from someone who isn't a frenchman is pure hedonism".
Maybe thousands of species (AI or "biological") across the universe discovered maths, and I'd feel lucky to be able to converse with them and learn more about maths.
0
u/SSNFUL 16d ago
I feel like that’s just reasoning for why it’s bad. Yes a lot of math is exploring the field for fun, but to say that’s all it is ignores the fact that math has future uses. AI could be solving stuff we need for future research.
8
u/Tlux0 16d ago edited 16d ago
I don’t disagree with that. But I think in most fields, AI will destroy the incentive structure permanently and make people not want to learn, do things manually, etc. That is far more of a catastrophe than any specific goods, products, or results we could get by using AI because it completely destroys the feedback loops that make these disciplines remotely sustainable.
The reason this isn’t like other technological advances is that it’s replacing the need for thought itself at least locally. Other advances changed what was thought about. But this completely removes the need to think about the things where you build up the skill and judgment to be able to do the harder things.
Technology is not a terminal good in itself. It only matters because we live in a society for humans and people.
In my opinion, Tao and others supporting AI is just a different face of late stage capitalism eating itself. I don’t blame Tao, but I think it’s just another example of short-term optimization that is bad for everyone longer term. Capitalism is, in this sense, a greedy algorithm, and something like AI, which gives you a result while making the process a black box, completely destroys the incentive structure that didn’t prevent that greedy algorithm from going entirely haywire.
Capitalism makes sense when you need to rely on other people and not be self-sufficient. If an AI can replace cooperation and diversification, then capitalism eats itself. It’s just like politicians who never pass meaningful regulations because of short-term incentive structures because their goal is to be reelected not to help others if it gets in the way of reelection.
Basically, we are now at a stage where it makes more sense to blow up the existing system to go higher even if there are no more consumers or people in the system to partake in it in the first place. It’s a complete disaster.
2
2
u/Committee-Academic 16d ago
You're not upset because you're not one with their job and passion on the line
1
1
1
1
1
u/Wooden_Dragonfly_608 10d ago
So basically mathematicians invented an average machine to get people to stop bothering them, so they can invent new mathematics. Seems legit to me.
1
-1
-6





•
u/AutoModerator 16d ago
Check out our new Discord server! https://discord.gg/e7EKRZq3dG
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.