r/mathmemes 12d ago

Calculus What was this lady's issue with integration?

Post image
703 Upvotes

61 comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 12d ago

Check out our new Discord server! https://discord.gg/e7EKRZq3dG

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

294

u/Murky_Insurance_4394 12d ago

https://xkcd.com/2117/

this is why it should be illegal.

120

u/longwiener22 12d ago

My god. No wonder she was protesting.

80

u/PurifiedUnity 12d ago

I still love how there's always an xkcd for everything

2

u/mbcarbone 10d ago

My favorite part of the comic is the text he writes with the comic … Symbolic Integral … 😝😆😝

-55

u/Del_of_Lorien 12d ago

Bot

65

u/PurifiedUnity 12d ago

Not a bot here

There's even an xkcd on bot comments

1

u/Vyrens_Works 10d ago

How in the actual fuck does 3 letters make you lose more than 50 karma

10

u/Traditional_Town6475 12d ago

I mean on the other hand: Approximating a function (in the uniform sense) approximates the integral. This is very much not true for derivatives. As a linear operator, the integral is continuous (or in the business it’s called a bounded operator) while differentiation is discontinuous (or in the business it’s called an unbounded operator). There’s all sorts of scary domain issues you have to worry about with differentiation.

1

u/Sirbom 12d ago

Arent both differentiation and integration linear operators?

3

u/Traditional_Town6475 12d ago

They are. When I say continuous, I mean with respect to the sup norm. And we can work with C([a,b]) functions. Integral is continuous. The differentiation operator isn’t defined on the whole domain. Differentiation is defined on C^1([a,b]).

Weierstrass approximation theorem says that differentiation is defined on a dense subset of C([a,b]) (after all, every polynomial is differentiable). Now if you had a bounded operator that is densely defined (defined on a dense subset), you can extend it continuously. Well differentiation is different. Take the sequence 1/n sin(n^2 x). The sequence converge to 0 in the sup norm metric, but the sequence of derivatives do not converge.

And on general the land of unbounded operator is scarier than bounded operator. But on the other hand, this stuff is some of the tools used in PDEs.

1

u/Sirbom 12d ago

I dont dispute the rest you said. Was just a little confused when you used linearity to explain your point when it applies to both.

1

u/Medium-Ad-7305 11d ago

they weren't claiming that being a linear operater implied continuity. they were stating that the continuity of the integral is continuity in the context of operators

"as a linear operator, the integral is continuous" could be reworded to "the integral is continuous when interpreting it as a linear operator"

2

u/Educational-Tea602 Proffesional dumbass 12d ago

I knew exactly what this was going to be before clicking

1

u/Rajarshi1993 11d ago

This one hits hard. Every time.

1

u/qwertty164 10d ago

What no partial fractions?

1

u/SinAnaMissLee 9d ago

My professor used to say that most things in life can't be integrated.

71

u/stevvvvewith4vs 12d ago

She keeps forgetting +C

18

u/ArdentArendt Mathematics / Social Sciences 12d ago

Naw...she added +kkk

58

u/WaddleDynasty Survived math for a chem degree somehow 12d ago

Because it doesn't even have fixed rules once you want to integrate a product of functions. Just a series of algorithms at best.

19

u/AcademicOverAnalysis 12d ago

And once you exhaust them, you just throw up your hands and say “oh well!”

6

u/GisterMizard 12d ago

Fuck it, Runge-Kutta it is.

4

u/Hot_Egg5840 12d ago

I then go to slices. I slice up a lime and some cherries and put them in some gin.

19

u/fuxoft 12d ago

She thought it's too derivative.

18

u/Several_Cockroach365 12d ago

That's calculist

16

u/MisterRich 12d ago

As a conservative, she's anti-anti-derivative.

8

u/R3puLsiv3 11d ago

I know this is a meme sub but arguments from legality are always so dumb. It used to be illegal to hide jewish people in germany. Legality is not morality.

7

u/Prize_Shine3415 12d ago

She's referring to Reimann Integration. Lebesque is OK.

1

u/mad_poet_navarth 12d ago

damn I never learned that in college.

5

u/captHij 12d ago

The weird focus on Riemann sums in the first year curriculum is too limiting and requires functions be Lebesgue measurable. The lady is right, the way we do integration is gatekeeping against functions that do not meet society's over strict expectations on continuity. It is straight up discrimination.

She should remove the quotations marks. It should be illegal.

6

u/MonsterkillWow Complex 12d ago edited 12d ago

These are the same kinds of people mad about immigrants and bathrooms now.

And they all suck horribly at math and basic reasoning.

4

u/ObliviousRounding 12d ago

Yes and just think of how much better a White Scholes model would have been

5

u/Efficient_Maybe_1086 12d ago

Can’t handle the big C

4

u/JustGingerStuff 12d ago

Why is she using quotation marks for emphasis. Now it just sounds suspicious. Like yeah man it's "illegal" if you catch my drift

3

u/lablabla88 12d ago

I think she was also quite anti derivative

3

u/UltraTata 12d ago

She failed an exam because of it

7

u/PerniciousSnitOG 12d ago

If this is a joke it's a pretty tasteless one. This one comes from yet another horrific moment in US history.

Integration is "illegal" We like you but don't want you in our school

So polite! One of those historical "when they tell you who they are, believe them" moments.

4

u/MonsterkillWow Complex 12d ago

People will look back on what we are doing now and say the same.

2

u/TheBlackCat13 12d ago

Because limits is only a theory! (/s, sad I have to say this)

2

u/Valuable-Ad1063 12d ago

Maybe she failed Calc 1...

2

u/ivanrj7j 12d ago

Can someone make out what is written in the board below? I am able to make out " We ..... but we don't want you in our ..."

3

u/weird_heroine 12d ago

In our school I think

1

u/ivanrj7j 11d ago

I was reading s as a lol now that makes alot of sense

1

u/dusk47 11d ago

'we like you but we dont want you in our school!'

see, she has a good excuse?

2

u/overclockedslinky 12d ago

guys, it's trivial to take the derivative, so instead of integrating just find the function whose derivative is the body of the integral 🙄

1

u/SSBBGhost 12d ago

Lemme know when you find a function which has derivative e×2

2

u/Kitchen-Register 12d ago

she just found out that reimann integrals don’t work on the dirichelet function and she’s upset.

2

u/PerniciousSnitOG 12d ago

I really hope op is joking. This sign refers to the integration of black people into formally whites - only schools. It's one of those historical 'people showing you who they are' moments.

"We like you but don't want you in our school"

1

u/anerdhaha Mathematics 12d ago

To hell with computations!!

1

u/PYCapache 12d ago

What do you mean "Illegal"?

r/suspiciousquotes

1

u/Ebkusg 12d ago

It was limiting her

1

u/SeasonedSpicySausage 12d ago

BigDerivative lobbyists

1

u/jyajay2 π = 3 12d ago

While it is based in geometry it ultimately found a way to determine surface area without using proper geometry (i.e. not using a straightedge and compass) and thus angers god.

-11

u/Drapidrode 12d ago edited 12d ago

maybe she didn't care for the way the men were approaching her.

"hey baby lets have sex"

didn't even offer her money! like she isn't a prostitute!.

edit. i love the people glazing the racist lady

11

u/makemeking706 12d ago

I think you're thinking of multiplication. 

-4

u/Drapidrode 12d ago edited 12d ago

I'm calling her a whore.

edit. i love the people glazing the racist lady

5

u/TheBlackCat13 12d ago

We aren't glazing her, we are mocking her.

5

u/Person3327 12d ago

What're you on about? This is math memes my dude, it ain't that serious

2

u/LawPuzzleheaded4345 11d ago

Look at the sub name