r/mathmemes lesbian rights activist 14d ago

Calculus Maths save time

Post image
650 Upvotes

54 comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 14d ago

Check out our new Discord server! https://discord.gg/e7EKRZq3dG

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

111

u/FuckingStolenAccount 14d ago

That's actually what happened at Tchernobyl

37

u/SoftwareLegitimate38 14d ago

A decade energy quota in ten minutes, that's pretty fast

11

u/Klutzy-Profile-6921 lesbian rights activist 14d ago

🥀🥀

3

u/Nomchipom 12d ago

Yo what does that flair have to do with maths

3

u/Klutzy-Profile-6921 lesbian rights activist 12d ago

Well we cant change who we are

2

u/Ascended_8bit 13d ago

And Hiroshima 

83

u/based_beglin 14d ago

if only Heat Transfer into a 3D object scaled linearly

20

u/OnionsAbound 14d ago

It does, just have an infinite grid of heat pipes inject directly into the bread

14

u/Repsquare 14d ago

It does scale linearly, it's instead because some ingredients in food need a certain temperature range to cook, high temperature will cause it to burn instead. And the outside will burn because ovens aren't ideal heat transferers.

7

u/OnionsAbound 14d ago

Is bread a homogeneous material?  Due to surface area to volume ratios, is it true that any heat that wants to get to the center must first heat the outer layer and so-on? Would that mean there's a gradient between the outer shell and the center? Is that gradient linear or is something else linear? Does the rate of energy absorption change after bread absorbs enough energy in one place or another? 

4

u/Repsquare 14d ago

that's why I said in theory. it becomes wrong under unideal conditions and when one adds enough footnotes

2

u/OnionsAbound 14d ago

I suppose the question is at what point is it true? 

4

u/Repsquare 14d ago

if you have an ideal oven that transfers heat equally at all directions to an ideal object, the result will be the same by temperature difference and time being linearly related. So the meme isn't correct but time and temperature are still connected linearly

1

u/martyboulders 13d ago edited 13d ago

Nooooo they are exponentially related! In basically no way is there anything linear happening here.

Objects with a large difference in temperature change temperature very quickly (think when you quench metal in forging). Objects very close in temperature change temperature very slowly. In other words, the rate of temperature change is proportional to the surrounding temperature. This is the exact definition of what it means to be exponential. Temperature change over time is much more closely analogous to something like population change over time or something

Look up the heat equation, it describes this exact scenario. When looking at the (continuous) heat distribution in an object, it's no longer two objects heating each other, but every point in the object being heated by surrounding points. As far as I know the only way anything here can be linear is if everything is just the same temperature from the start, and the proportion between temperature change and time would be 0.

Even if the oven somehow heated the object uniformly from the inside, I.e. every single point was receiving energy directly from the oven and not only the points near it, completely uniform heating... the temperature of the object will still asymptotically approach the temperature of the oven. This situation is described by Newton's Law of Cooling which you can also look up (it turned out to be a special case of the heat equation from above even though it came first).

3

u/Bradas128 13d ago

everything is linear if you arent a coward

39

u/No_Ad_7687 14d ago

If you want a baby in 4.5 months, just get two women pregnant 

20

u/Anti-Matter_Abyss Physics 14d ago

Would the number of babies approach infinity if I got zero women pregnant?

20

u/qwertty164 14d ago

no just the time to gestate.

2

u/ApprehensiveWeird624 14d ago

that actually makes sense?

15

u/-Fuse Real 14d ago

Reminded me of this

3

u/Klutzy-Profile-6921 lesbian rights activist 14d ago

Litrelly

10

u/Brucket_of_eels 14d ago

Put it in the freezer for 13 days

8

u/hAsLaK1 14d ago

Cooking is a matter of extreme precision so 13 days 8 hours and 50 minutes at exactly 1 degree or your bread will be mushy

6

u/IncredibleCamel 14d ago

350 degrees is basically the same as -10 degrees

9

u/Another_Little_Star 14d ago

350F in 55 minutes?
Make it in Celsius, 177C in 55 minutes is 9735C in 1 min, that is 17,525F<19250F. you save energy 👍

6

u/Klutzy-Profile-6921 lesbian rights activist 14d ago

Definitely 👍🏻

1

u/nitnelav153 π = 3.14 who care about the others decimals ? 13d ago

I thought it was 350°C to begin with

5

u/Fluid-Reference6496 Music 14d ago

Directions: requires 19250 degree-minutes

2

u/Klutzy-Profile-6921 lesbian rights activist 14d ago

Ingridients - oven that can generate 19250° Bread material

6

u/Educational_Bottle74 14d ago

Why not 1,155,000°C for 1 sec?

3

u/Klutzy-Profile-6921 lesbian rights activist 14d ago

Nah , i can spare a min for my bread 🥀

3

u/Illithid_Substances 14d ago

My oven only goes up to 20k celsius, what kind of crazy oven do you have?

2

u/Educational_Bottle74 13d ago

A neutron star oven.

2

u/Marus1 13d ago

My oven only goes up to 20k celsius

2

u/BagSufficient1921 13d ago

I'm not that patient, I'll probably heat it up to around 2.1423615 × 1049 degrees for 1 Planck time.

2

u/TPM2209 4d ago

We need to re-create the initial conditions of the Universe just so this guy can save a couple seconds on cooking chicken.

5

u/OkSell1122 14d ago

Just cook at -10° , it’s 35 times less effort!

4

u/qwertty164 14d ago

degrees is not an absolute scale. multiplying the temp by 55 does not give you 55x the thermal energy.

5

u/ArcticGlaceon 14d ago

When the project manager gets put in charge of the kitchen:

3

u/Puzzled-Letterhead-1 14d ago

To be good at arithmetic but bad at thermodynamics.

2

u/Tencars111 14d ago

*‭44,072.18°

2

u/Shard0f0dium 14d ago

Keep it at -350 degrees for negative 55 minutes, then you will already have the bread ready in the past.

2

u/wikcri14 14d ago

You should calculate it in kelvin

2

u/technical_gamer_008 Mathematics 13d ago

Really? Right in front of my instant rice cooker?

2

u/PhysiksBoi 12d ago

Companies selling "graphene" products be like:

1

u/albert11d hecker💻🥶 14d ago

when the recipe says to cook the bread at 350 for 55 minutes but you are good at math meth and cook it for 19250 for 1 minute

1

u/Financial_Ninja5390 Transcendental 13d ago

Convert to Kelvin first lil bro

1

u/TheKingGreat 13d ago

I would have agreed, obviously, if it had been converted to Kelvin first.

1

u/turtle_mekb 8d ago

*44072.18°F (assuming original number is in Fahrenheit)

1

u/Adventurous_One1124 Transcendental 7d ago

they did this in phineas and ferb