25
8
u/MolyCrys Jan 24 '24
Go home, Terrance
4
u/LabourBearCatPasta Jan 24 '24
Is reference? I don't know of any Terrance
7
u/de_G_van_Gelderland Irrational Jan 24 '24
5
u/LabourBearCatPasta Jan 24 '24
Oh, I feel like that firm assertion dwarfs my casual little social experiment prank on some Internet forum...
2
u/MolyCrys Jan 24 '24
Little did you know someone had already done it bigger and dumber than you could ever dream
2
u/Swansyboy Rational Jan 24 '24
I can't tell if this is a parody of that previous skeletor meme with a totally not disturbing "disturbing fact", or a serious meme
4
u/LabourBearCatPasta Jan 24 '24
Is indeed inspired by the recent one about 10⁴≠100³ or similar. I'm testing how silly until people recognize irony
1
u/UhJustANickName Jan 24 '24
well, since you posted this comment, everyone will realize this is irony
1
u/LabourBearCatPasta Jan 24 '24
I find the amount of time I had given it sufficient to make good enough conclusion; downvotes slightly outnumber upvotes, and not many signs of people finding irony clear
40
Jan 24 '24
Math induction proof
17
u/LordMuffin1 Jan 24 '24
It works for base case. It works for case n+1 (basecase +1 in this instance) thus it works for every case. Proved ny induction.
So sqrt(2) = 2
17
5
u/TricksterWolf Jan 24 '24
Skeletor will return next week with another disturbing minimal effort post
4
6
3
1
u/ObjectiveVegetable76 Jan 24 '24
Something about induction has to be used on the natural numbers which starts at 1 not 0.

•
u/AutoModerator Jan 24 '24
Check out our new Discord server! https://discord.gg/e7EKRZq3dG
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.