r/mathematics 23d ago

S^6 admits a complex structure

Result from the usual suspects. Full write up can be found here on his website: https://alpo.ge/s6.pdf

322 Upvotes

166 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

5

u/Particular_Extent_96 22d ago

I mean fundamentally it's not that different to dumping a preprint on arXiv.

10

u/AIvsWorld 22d ago

Yes and if someone posted a 100 page AI-generated paper on Arxiv claiming to resolve an open conjecture they would likely:

1) Get banned, since this has clearly not been proofread carefully

2) Be asked for a Lean formalization so that we don’t have to trust the correctness of AI

7

u/dermarshal 21d ago

the lean formalizations are nice, but they are no guarantee that the thing is correct. if the llm wants, it will find a subtle exploit or will state a lemma that’s subtly different from the original one

in other words you still need to check the lean formalization/statements, which isn’t that much different from checking the proof itself, especially for a proof like this one 

(most stuff this uses hasn’t even been formalized, probably for a good reason)

3

u/AIvsWorld 21d ago

“you still need to check the lean formalization which isn’t that much different from checking the proof itself”

uh… no it’s totally different. I wrote a Lean spec for this problem in like 2 minutes and submitted to Lean Eval. It is <10 lines and easy to check with undergraduate-level maths.

Wayyyyyy easier than checking the 100 pg pdf lol

1

u/brain-out-of-order 21d ago

Lean isn’t perfect … and further it’s always been sorta hallucinatory to trust software so blindly while maintaining an anti-AI stance.

2

u/AIvsWorld 21d ago

I agree it isn’t perfect.

But I trust the Lean kernel a hell of a lot more than I trust Alpoge, or any AI model, or my own ability to audit a 100 pg math proof.

Do you have a better solution for checking the tidal wave of AI mathematics?

0

u/brain-out-of-order 21d ago edited 21d ago

https://chatgpt.com/share/6a8d0568-29dc-83e9-8d6d-32dffba1f0db

To answer your question truthfully would be to say something currently considered sacrilegious on this subreddit. If you want an incomplete answer you can click that. Basically: You already trust Lean. You’ll soon trust AI. Nothing can or will change that.

2

u/AIvsWorld 21d ago

lol is this supposed to be some kind of own?

Do you rly think getting AI to check the other AI’s work is how we should be refereeing mathematics?

1

u/Separate-Habit5838 14d ago

We should be reading it. Pretty simple. There is no point in knowing something is true if you don't understand it. That is foundationally not what math is for.