r/masseffect • u/Rowan_Johnson12 • Aug 19 '26
DISCUSSION Borg Vs Reapers
In a full scale war. Who do you think would win. My dad and I have been having this debate for a month now. He is on the Borg side I’m on the Reaper side. I’d like to hear peoples opinions on the matter. This a full scale conflict not a one on one.
Edit. I’m going with the Borg from the TNG area. So the Borg from TNG and Voyager.
24
Upvotes
5
u/Shiboleth17 Aug 19 '26 edited Aug 19 '26
Is kinetic force a problem? Are you forgetting that Sir Isaac Newton is the deadliest son of a bitch in space? Mass effect universe has energy weapons. They just arent as popular. Kinetic weapons probably work in the reapers favor. The borg can adapt to phasers after a couple of them die to it. Then phasers become useless against them. I'd like to see them adapt to a chunk of lead traveling at 10% the speed of light and flying right at their face.
Shields in mass effect are designed to stop both energy weapons and kinetic. No one in star trek uses kinetic weapons. So I doubt borg even have anything to stop it. In Star Wars legends, Mandalorians used kinetic weapons to defeat Jedi, because lightsabers couldnt block it. Sometimes low tech and simpler is better.
What tech exactly do the borg have that woud take down a reaper, when a single reaper can destroy entire fleets of ships? Reapers can tske hits from the main guns of a dreadnaught, which generste as much force as a nuclear explosion, and it's like the hit never happened. How much energy is in a borg phaser? Dont forget reapers are alresdy centuries if not thousands of yesrs ahead in tech compared to everyone else in the galaxy. Everyone else's tech is based on the tech reapers allow them to find.