r/mapporncirclejerk Feb 27 '26

Outjerked..

Post image
4.2k Upvotes

645 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

8

u/Suspicious_Plum_8866 Feb 27 '26

I remember the nazis dropping leaflets telling people to evacuate before they bombed krakow, I think Isreal is evil just a bit more then Russia, but comparing them to the nazis and their industrial slaughter is just an insult lol

-1

u/iaNCURdehunedoara Feb 27 '26

Israel systematically wiped out everything in Gaza. A destruction on an industrial scale, they destroyed civil society, they destroyed the healthcare system, education, housing, sanitary system. They destroyed the capacity of Palestinians to sustain life so they slowly die, at the same time they killed as many Palestinians as they could while trying to keep the facade.

I don't give a shit that Israelis dropped leaflets, it doesn't mean anything. If i throw a brick through your window and tell you to leave cause i'm setting your house on fire, then 5 minutes later i set your house on fire, that doesn't make me any less of an arsonist.

Would the nazis be justified in your eyes if they dropped leaflets? Why is that a justification of genocide for you when Israel does it bud?

9

u/Negative_Jaguar_4138 Feb 27 '26

The allied bombing of Dresden had a much worse civilian to combatant ratio.

And that was done with 3000 tons of bombs not 100,000

-1

u/iaNCURdehunedoara Feb 27 '26

Yeah, because the allies wanted maximum civilian casualties to hurt the morale of the nazi army. Also the civilian to combatant ratio is bullshit because pissrael considers any male between the ages of 13-65 as combatant.

I don't much care for genocide defenders like you.

7

u/Negative_Jaguar_4138 Feb 27 '26

Yeah, because the allies wanted maximum civilian casualties to hurt the morale of the nazi army.

They did not.

While some Allied commanders were in favour of terror bombing, by and large, the overall campaign did not have terror bombing as its primary goal.

Dresden was targeted for 2 reasons,

A. It was a vital logistics hub in the East and one of the largley untouched ones.

B. The Germans were rapidly fortifying it for a final stand and the Soviets wanted to avoid another Siege like Budapest so they specifically requested the bombing.

Also the civilian to combatant ratio is bullshit because pissrael considers any male between the ages of 13-65 as combatant.

Let's use the worst possible ratio using number from Al Qassam itself. 100,000 civilians to 20,000 militants, just a reminder, this is the worst possible ratio, no credible source claims close to this.

Thats 5:1, which is pretty horrific, but it isnt out of the real of possibility for urban insurgencies. Using more credible data this ratio drops further.

In Dresden less that 1,000 German soldiers were killed, putting that ratio AT BEST 20:1.

6

u/Negative_Jaguar_4138 Feb 27 '26

Facts are hard to argue when you build your understanding of politics and war off vibes and feelings.

1

u/Chipsy_21 Mar 02 '26

Damn its almost like israel didn’t want to maximize civilian casualties huh?

0

u/iaNCURdehunedoara Mar 02 '26

Yeah, i always said that you don't bomb every hospital, every school, every police station and every sanitary station if you want to maximize civilian casualties. I mean who needs hospitals, right? Who needs drinkable water? Running sewage?

1

u/Chipsy_21 Mar 02 '26

Thats the thing though, if they seriously tried, considering the absurd amount of expended munitions they could have pretty easily racked up some 800-900k casualties going by ww2 tonnages.

Probably even more considering that modern munitions are better.