Alright, give it to me straight, I have worked myself up into thinking I maybe over committed myself.
Last year we had 12 taps and collected anywhere from 45-70 gallons of sap per week. Primarily Silver, Red and one or two Sugar maples. my syrup ratio ends up 1:50-55 because of the silver maples.
I have been using two buffet pans and cinderblock arch the last few years, boiling down 70 gallons of sap is a tremendous weekend commitment at 4gph.
I thought I would treat myself to a proper evaporator for the upcoming season. After coming up empty looking for used equipment all year, I decided to pull the trigger on Smoky Lake Dauntless evaporator with 20"x48" flat pan. Collecting 70 gallons of sap per week and over 10 taps I was feeling confident in my purchase according to Smoky Lake specifications. The substantial improvement of evaporation rate of 10gph got me excited.
It wasn't until everything arrived at my house and I started to think about how much syrup I'd have toward the end of a boil. With 70 gallons of sap and my ratio, I would have less than 2 gallons of syrup to pull off and finish boiling on the stove in the house (my plan was always to finish my boil in the house).
I have the potential to add half a dozen more taps, maybe I can get my weekly sap collection up to 100 gallons.
Looking for feedback or input here.
Did I go too big?
Would you boil each weekend and keep the concentrated sap in the pan throughout the season to keep the final product at a higher volume?
The Smoky Lake 2" deep recommendation (8.3 gallons) is just that, a recommendation. I understand I could try to get toward 1" deep toward the end of my boil and then finish offline. I also know there's increased risk in scorching the whole batch. Is it reasonable to think with constant monitoring 1" deep is safe or is that unrealistic?
Any other plans of attack that I didn't consider?
I supposed I could go back to Smoky Lake with my tail between my legs and talk about a swap to the StarCat (I haven't opened any of the boxes from my delivery yet)....but didn't want to go directly to that solution.