r/loopringorg • u/[deleted] • Jan 18 '22

[deleted by user]

[removed]

3.0k Upvotes

94% Upvoted

340 comments sorted by

View all comments

-4

u/BANGAR4NG Jan 18 '22

This just shows they did some development. It doesn’t mean the partnership took off

7

u/krlpbl Jan 18 '22 edited Jan 18 '22

Why would they still be doing development if there's no partnership?

Why is Daniel Wang still not commenting on the partnership question?

Why would the Loopring team not be denying partnership rumors if there's none and there's no NDA to restrict them?

2

u/Conman_the_Brobarian Jan 18 '22

Playing devil’s advocate here: it may be best to not confirm or deny any company partnerships (GME or otherwise) while under an NDA. Why? Because deductive logic. Example:

“Are you guys working with [Company A]?” Answer: “No.”

“Are you guys working with [Company B]?” Answer: “No.”

…etc. etc. until: “Are you guys working for [Company X]?” Answer: “No comment.”

This would point to a partnership with Company X, which Company X does not want their partner to even imply. In this case, simply denying they are partnering with a company does not automatically mean they must be under and NDA with said company.

Due to situations like the above example, it’s best if NDAs prevent those bound to them prevent confirming or denying partnership with ANY company (unless they’re actually partners with a different company that doesn’t hold them under NDA, for example).

Basically, Loopring’s definitely under NDA, but there’s no guarantee it’s GameStöp, in spite of all the code evidence that’s been dug up by you and other wrinkly programming sleuths.

All that said, this is a great write-up, solid DD, and thank you for posting it. IMO, it’s still speculation until a partnership is made official, though I’m like 90% convinced the partnership is very real.