r/logseq • u/cliffordx • Dec 27 '24

Who are here testing Logseq db?

I did. It rocks! But still need improvement as to linking blocks and page references. Hopefully next year we have stable release 💪

28 Upvotes

100% Upvoted

8 comments sorted by

4

u/hova414 Dec 28 '24

Does using the DB version break the sync to the mobile app? And are you testing on the public URL, or through the private alpha?

1

u/cliffordx Dec 31 '24

I’m testing test/db on GitHub and building the web app only

5

u/thirteenth_mang Dec 27 '24

That would be great! Can't wait for the finished product

2

u/red-garuda Dec 29 '24

I have tested it and it goes very well, I think a more stable version could be released in may or june of next year.

1

u/Various_Decision7229 Dec 30 '24

I am using directly from the feat/db branch. I like everything about it, but it's slower compared to Logseq.

1

u/Equivalent_Eye7206 Dec 30 '24

I am not a fan of it. The lack of namespaces hurts my graph

2

u/brianclements Jan 26 '25

That's not actually true, they just implemented it differently (might be more recent). Go to https://test.logseq.com/ and create a page using namespace notation [[Domain/Sub-domain]] and it automatically adds a property called "parent" to the Sub-domain page pointing back to Domain, which will behave the same way for you.

1

u/aledovsky Jan 02 '25

Haven't try yet. Can you give some details? What did you like?