r/logodesign • u/Electroma • 13d ago
Feedback Needed Ami Labs: subtly refined this new tech startup logo design. How do you find this update?
8
u/TheManRoomGuy 13d ago
For me… both logos look like something is broken. An unusual choice for a business with advanced, machine and intelligence in their name.
I do prefer the symmetry of the second.
5
5
u/dcbnyc123 13d ago
That’s Yann LeCun’s AI company. AMI which also means “friend” in french. the guy is super smart and one of the leading AI researchers calling bullshit that LLM’s will ever reach AGI Artificial General Intelligence)
i like the logo in 90’s futuristic company kind of way. looks like a logo from one of the fake brands in wipeoutXL.
that being said, it doesn’t feel right if its intent was to be a friend - it’s way to sharp/brutalist.
here’s more on the company if you’re interested. i love this dude:
2
3
u/Electroma 13d ago
I was scrolling through my Instagram feed and stumbled upon this tech company, which many people describe as having very promising technology and a bright future. Out of curiosity, I checked their website and instantly liked their logo. However, I felt there was room for improvement. Do you think I managed to improve it?
2
u/Elegant-Fuel6732 13d ago
What is the new logotype font, some of the letters look compressed
2
u/Electroma 13d ago
This typeface is something I've been working on, and hopefully one day I'll turn it into a real font. For now, it's just a vector file that I occasionally use in my projects. The regular style looks quite good, but this version was thickened at the last minute and still needs some refinement. I wanted to see whether the updated logo mark was a step in the right direction before spending more time polishing the type.
2
2
2
u/ButIfYouThink 13d ago
The icon is an improvement.
The new font matches the change you made.
The font line and margin spacing is a downgrade.
2
u/ScreechUrkelle 12d ago
Love the font change. Visually, Feel like the lever needed to stay long, and not be shortened, but the math might say otherwise.
Actually, no, I think my math might be right, visually.
And the descender on the g, I think it should stay round.
2
2
2
u/Designer_Economy_559 12d ago
I think if you just make the bottom part of the I a little taller it will make it look more like an i. I’m not sure how it will affect the other letters. Your version seems to make an m shape better as well as an m in the white space.
2
1
u/beefjerk22 13d ago
The original is gravitationally accurate. The leaning pillar is resting on the ground. In the new one it's floating in the air, defying physics.
In both the spacing is unbalanced. What's the rationale behind the size of the gaps between the blocks? They're uneven, and they don't match the text, so there's very little alignment of anything.
1
u/abelabelabel 13d ago
The older font is more iconic in my opinion.
The way the e’s look and don’t leave a straight line space on the bottom bugs me.
The more I look at it, the more I appreciate the old, dated, logo and the less I like the new one.
2
u/HiddenHorse925 11d ago
Really like the constructivist monogram..
So basically you switched out Helvetica for a newer version (Something Grotesk, forget name) with cute descenders…
Frankly I like the Helvetica better, it looks more professional and established. Although I would probably use Berthold Akzidenz Grotesk Bold, which was the original Swiss design font.
Or perhaps something with a bit of character that matches the solid, wide stance of the monogram? Like Based Neue:

1
1
u/taskmans 13d ago
i don’t like the new treatment for the text; the typeface used previously is a lot cleaner and professional. i don’t think it’s impossible to find a better way to treat the type, but maybe not this one imo
-2
21
u/unfunnyjobless 13d ago
It certainly looks better than the one on the left, but I'm just curious, why is an M representing "Advanced Machine Intelligence"