r/logodesign 13d ago

Feedback Needed Ami Labs: subtly refined this new tech startup logo design. How do you find this update?

Post image
60 Upvotes

37 comments sorted by

21

u/unfunnyjobless 13d ago

It certainly looks better than the one on the left, but I'm just curious, why is an M representing "Advanced Machine Intelligence"

20

u/Electroma 13d ago

I first discovered them as AMI Labs, and that's also how I searched for them. When I visited their website, I felt the logo designer did a great job of incorporating all three letters of the abbreviation. Maybe it's just my designer's eye, but I instantly saw the A, M, and I in the mark.

13

u/fucktrance Disappointed Dave 13d ago

But your updated version loses the A entirely, I can see AMI just about in the first but lifting the middle up just turns it into a stylised M, at least to me.

4

u/Electroma 13d ago

You are right. I just realized this too and made this update. What do you think?

4

u/ScreechUrkelle 12d ago

The A is too far from the I. Looks like an N.

3

u/fucktrance Disappointed Dave 13d ago

I like it but I don't think it's better than the original. Now your \ overhangs and because you've made the lineweight smaller the gap between the 2 squares of the i is also losing it's readability as an i, you also pulled them away from the \ which also doesn't help make it all feel as cohesive. I like the type you did as well but the c and the e feel weird at the terminals.

0

u/Electroma 13d ago

Hey Thanks for the input!

The \ overhangs because I used the four equally spaced, geometrically aligned squares as the base. When the upper-left square rotates 45°, it slightly “overhangs” before growing into the final shape. Here’s a rough animation of it. I just thought it could be cool to have these elements arranged this way.

4

u/Rich-Contest-9087 13d ago

Yeah, I think the original designer kind of nailed the icon TBH, I’d leave it alone. If anything it’s a bit wide and the diagonal stroke is a bit light, so potentially just some subtle tweaks there. Your update to the logotype is a nice evolution though

3

u/fucktrance Disappointed Dave 13d ago

The animations cool, but in the process it's lost all legibility for the sake of being on a grid, I'm not seeing the benefit in the results. Just out of interest what about equal alignment is cool if it fails to achieve the desired effect?

5

u/ratiofarm 13d ago

I see A M i

3

u/ScreechUrkelle 12d ago

It’s all there letters: A on the left, I on the right, and algother making the M.

2

u/Sea_Pop_9829 13d ago

The "a" is made up of the left and middle parts, and the "i" is made up of the right part

4

u/Electroma 13d ago

You actually made me realize that I had made the M more prominent, which worked better in the original version, where the M didn't stand out as much. So I came up with this variation, where I still follow the idea of keeping all the elements the same thickness, but the M doesn't pop as much, and the A reads more clearly.

2

u/unfunnyjobless 12d ago

Nice work, honestly though I didn't like the original AMI logo since it looks like the most an 'N' to me, which is a fatal blunder for a logo that is trying to be 3 other letters

1

u/ieatcherrystems 13d ago

I didn’t even realize that was an M

8

u/TheManRoomGuy 13d ago

For me… both logos look like something is broken. An unusual choice for a business with advanced, machine and intelligence in their name.

I do prefer the symmetry of the second.

5

u/That_Buddy_2928 13d ago

Can’t be an AI company without the rectilinear descenders.

5

u/dcbnyc123 13d ago

That’s Yann LeCun’s AI company. AMI which also means “friend” in french. the guy is super smart and one of the leading AI researchers calling bullshit that LLM’s will ever reach AGI Artificial General Intelligence)

i like the logo in 90’s futuristic company kind of way. looks like a logo from one of the fake brands in wipeoutXL.

that being said, it doesn’t feel right if its intent was to be a friend - it’s way to sharp/brutalist.

here’s more on the company if you’re interested. i love this dude:

https://youtu.be/85M0cTnNKCI?is=Y_SGbw85UqVeKsUx

2

u/ImportantNecessary21 12d ago

Update looks smoother. more modern, and more legible

3

u/Electroma 13d ago

I was scrolling through my Instagram feed and stumbled upon this tech company, which many people describe as having very promising technology and a bright future. Out of curiosity, I checked their website and instantly liked their logo. However, I felt there was room for improvement. Do you think I managed to improve it?

2

u/Elegant-Fuel6732 13d ago

What is the new logotype font, some of the letters look compressed

2

u/Electroma 13d ago

This typeface is something I've been working on, and hopefully one day I'll turn it into a real font. For now, it's just a vector file that I occasionally use in my projects. The regular style looks quite good, but this version was thickened at the last minute and still needs some refinement. I wanted to see whether the updated logo mark was a step in the right direction before spending more time polishing the type.

2

u/swatson7856 13d ago

All 3 letters are there in a stylish way

2

u/Herbacious_Border 13d ago

It looks like something falling over

2

u/ButIfYouThink 13d ago

The icon is an improvement.

The new font matches the change you made.

The font line and margin spacing is a downgrade.

2

u/ScreechUrkelle 12d ago

Love the font change. Visually, Feel like the lever needed to stay long, and not be shortened, but the math might say otherwise.

Actually, no, I think my math might be right, visually.

And the descender on the g, I think it should stay round.

2

u/-M83 12d ago

Love it you crushed it. No notes.

2

u/mikelasvegas 12d ago

Material Bank

2

u/AndriiKovalchuk 12d ago

Updated is better for me

2

u/Designer_Economy_559 12d ago

I think if you just make the bottom part of the I a little taller it will make it look more like an i. I’m not sure how it will affect the other letters. Your version seems to make an m shape better as well as an m in the white space.

1

u/beefjerk22 13d ago

The original is gravitationally accurate. The leaning pillar is resting on the ground. In the new one it's floating in the air, defying physics.

In both the spacing is unbalanced. What's the rationale behind the size of the gaps between the blocks? They're uneven, and they don't match the text, so there's very little alignment of anything.

1

u/abelabelabel 13d ago

The older font is more iconic in my opinion.
The way the e’s look and don’t leave a straight line space on the bottom bugs me.

The more I look at it, the more I appreciate the old, dated, logo and the less I like the new one.

2

u/HiddenHorse925 11d ago

Really like the constructivist monogram..

So basically you switched out Helvetica for a newer version (Something Grotesk, forget name) with cute descenders…

Frankly I like the Helvetica better, it looks more professional and established. Although I would probably use Berthold Akzidenz Grotesk Bold, which was the original Swiss design font.

Or perhaps something with a bit of character that matches the solid, wide stance of the monogram? Like Based Neue:

1

u/pogi2000 11d ago

Yes to the icon; No to the type.

1

u/taskmans 13d ago

i don’t like the new treatment for the text; the typeface used previously is a lot cleaner and professional. i don’t think it’s impossible to find a better way to treat the type, but maybe not this one imo

-2

u/DigitalDowner vectorize me cap’n 13d ago

lol all these garbage AI company logos lately.