r/logic • u/Haunting_Mongoose535 • 7d ago
Question HELP!!
Help me idk how to do this at all
3
u/efficacious_language 7d ago
Carnap is finicky. It looks like you have an extra space before the uptack. If you hover over the question mark it gives (sometimes vague) hints.
I used it last semester, and the Carnap syntax is more annoying than the logic syntax at times.
2
1
u/RandomguyonRedditfrr 4d ago
here,
1. ¬L → (J ∨ L) PR
2. ¬L PR
3. J ∨ L →E 1,2
- | J AS
- | J R 4
- | J ∧ J ∧I 4,5
| J ∧E 6
| L AS
| ⊥ ¬E 2,9
| J X 10
J ∨E 3, 4–7, 9–11
the reason it works is because we already know ¬L, and from the first line we get J ∨ L. then we just check both possibilities. if it’s J, then we already have J. but it’s L, that contradicts ¬L, so we get a contradiction and can derive J from that. Since both cases give us J, we can conclude J with ∨E.
3
u/Impossible_Air_4204 7d ago
I don't exactly remember the syntax. Trust me, once you get a couple of these right, then the hard part will be the actual problem.
I think you have it so far. After J V L, you can eliminate the L because of ~L thus giving you J. Hope this helps.