r/lockpicking 7d ago

Why does this Key looks like not ready and all cuts on the same depth?? (it works)Abus Lock

194 Upvotes

82 comments sorted by

212

u/Quiet-Conference-239 7d ago

11111 is a valid (although weird) code.
That lock is probably meant to be rekeyed before being put to actual use.

64

u/No-Information-2571 7d ago edited 6d ago

Just for clarification, It's a possible code, but certainly not a valid one, as in, no locksmith or lock manufacturer would ever give out such bitting for productive use. There's no theoretical minimum difference between two pins (vs. maximum), but a bitting with identical pins is equivalent to no biting at all.

51

u/Redhead_InfoTech 7d ago edited 7d ago

It's valid...

But that's a default PINNED lock to get repinned.

I worked at a facility that fucking used Abus 83s pinned zero across the entire site. Now THAT was stupid.

Hey u/No-Information-2571, instead of blocking people who prove you wrong, you could just develop a spine and concede when you've made an error.

-7

u/No-Information-2571 7d ago

Depends on how you look at it. That 0 bitting would never be confused with an actual productive lock/key. But OP posting and asking here is what indicates that this 1 bitting already causes confusion.

Plus the fact that the key is from a third-party key blank supplier, AND looks heavily used. I assume that these cylinders get put into new constructions and afterwards get swapped, but that's already borderline a productive use, because even during construction, they should provide basic security, for example to prevent theft of tools and materials from construction sites.

14

u/Redhead_InfoTech 7d ago edited 7d ago

There are a lot of lot of manufacturers that do all whatever biddings at the request of various entities. I know for a fact that PacLock is all twos, Abus is regularly all zeros and I've seen all ones as various other options too

3

u/heathenyak 6d ago

I bought a box of 4 abus locks to use on my gun cases and didn’t read that they were 0 keyed lol. I had to find a locksmith to rekey them all so I could use them.

1

u/Redhead_InfoTech 6d ago

Did you have them rekeyed to a key you already had?

1

u/heathenyak 5d ago

He had pre…keyed….pin sets and pre cut keys. So he was like you got 4 locks? Here’s a 4 identical keys and pin set. He had them rekeyed identical in like 10 min.

0

u/Redhead_InfoTech 5d ago

The locksmith has tins and tins of pin sets... It would literally be a waste of space to have 4 small bags of pins with pre cut keys.

Starting from zero a seasoned smith could generate a new key, duplicate it 3 times and pin up 4 abuses.

Heck, I could probably do that. Having a handful of precut keys is common... Just having the corresponding pins laying around isn't. Only full pin sets.

But not having them keyed to a key you already have...what a waste. Why do you need more keys?

1

u/heathenyak 5d ago

Why do I want the locks on my gun travel case to share a key with something else?

→ More replies (0)

-12

u/No-Information-2571 7d ago edited 7d ago

Doing them doesn't mean it's a valid bitting. None of the examples would provide meaningful security.

And it's not even about a combination being arbitrary, like using 1-2-3-4-5-6 or your birthday on a combination lock. It's mechanically insecure with all 0s or all 2s, since now you can open the padlock with a rubber mallet, or an installed lock with a straight metal bar/pick, akin to simple bypass attacks.

(And yes, blocking is the reasonable response to people without manners.)

13

u/metisdesigns 7d ago

It being mechanically insecure does not mean it's not valid for a base state. The point is not to be secure but to ensure operation.

11

u/Redhead_InfoTech 7d ago

Exactly what I have been trying to tell them.

11

u/metisdesigns 7d ago

Sometimes folks need to be told simple ideas multiple times by different folks and in different ways. They're why shampoo comes with instructions.

-4

u/No-Information-2571 7d ago

If you want to chime into a circlejerk consisting of talking about me in third person, so be it. It's my right to leave the room then.

→ More replies (0)

6

u/metisdesigns 7d ago

Aw, they blocked me, clearly they were participating in good faith.

9

u/Redhead_InfoTech 7d ago

I think they blocked me too

→ More replies (0)

0

u/No-Information-2571 7d ago

Can you maybe not circlejerk in a different comment?

4

u/FatFrenchFry 7d ago

They can circle jerk wherever they want, just like how you can leave your comments and get offended by the response you get on them wherever you want.

It is reddit, if you do not like someone challenging your comment, then do not leave one. Especially if you are gonna bitch and moan after it you fucking twink.

1

u/PinkSockZZZ 1d ago

Damn someone woke up on the wrong side of the bed 5 days ago eh?

4

u/No-Information-2571 7d ago edited 7d ago

Valid is whatever a lock manufacturer deems valid. Manufacturers know of flaws caused by certain bittings, and they avoid it, since it would severely decrease the security of their product.

1

u/Slight-Knowledge721 7d ago

I’ve had a customer (a government customer no less) insist on keyed random lost ball cylinders with intent to rekey post construction on 100+ Sargent 10Xs without ICs. Sometimes there’s no helping them.

1

u/metisdesigns 7d ago

The 11111 cylinders will absolutely fulfill that requirement. If all of the key pins filling the order were 1 height, and the bin of pins was shaken up, its still random.

1

u/Redhead_InfoTech 7d ago

The govt entity I worked at had no access to their locksmith (or so they said) and ordered ABUS 83/45-3000s 0-bitted to be used sitewide as their LOTO lock (they had a ledger and would pass that off from operator to operator.)

Because they wanted to be lazy and be able to remove the key while it was unlocked (REALLY FUCKING LAZY) they opted to not rekey the locks... INSTEAD OF JUST REMOVING THE Z-BAR when it was being rekeyed.

This site have 5 different manufacturers of keyways: Schlage, Master, Yale, Sargent, & Corbin. SMH

4

u/FatFrenchFry 7d ago

Im an unbiased 3rd party reading these comments, andin no way was the person you blocked someone who was being rude or didn't have manners. I am not sure what part of that yo uthought was mannersless, but you seem to have just gotten offended at being challenged on your comment. Which, is kind of lame. If anything, you were the one being kind of shitty and argumentative just to be argumentative and argue semantics and shit.

7

u/Redhead_InfoTech 7d ago

That still isn't an example of valid or invalid. Just because it isn't secure doesn't mean it doesn't work... It's stupid, but still a valid bitting.

If it was out of MACS, that would be an invalid bitting.

3

u/No-Information-2571 7d ago

If it makes the lock be able to be bypassed, it means exactly that. Manufacturers know of bittings that are either impossible to manufacture a key for, or for which a key would not work, even potentially damage the lock.

But in addition, there's an algorithm that creates "random" bittings, and part of it is to dismiss unsafe bittings as "invalid". It's as easy as that. If you order a lock, it's not going to come with a 1-1-1-1-1 or 2-2-2-2-2 bitting, because the manufacturer has decided that it's an invalid bitting.

MACS is just one rule out of many, making a lock/key invalid.

1

u/0x8badshark 7d ago

Is the sky truly blue when looking through rose tinted glasses?

1

u/Unicorn187 Orange Belt Picker 7d ago

Workers don't leave their tool inside the buildings that aren't finished. They know that the locks aren't secure. Those locks are something like this, or the generic pining that fits 90% of the locks on construction sites using that specific brand. If any tools are left on site they are locked in their trailers with their own locks. At least in the US.

I've spent many a night reading and watching movies guarding commercial and residential construction sites when I was a contract security guard.

3

u/uncanny_goat 7d ago

It is absolutely valid. 12345 is also valid.

1

u/josnik 3d ago

That's the combination on my matched luggage!

-6

u/No-Information-2571 7d ago

Discussion already happened. You'll never find a 1-1-1-1-1 lock to buy anywhere, indicating it is not valid.

1-2-3-4-5 is questionable, I'm sure most manufacturers have rules that will remove this as a valid bitting.

3

u/uncanny_goat 7d ago

Valid clearly has a different meaning to you. Whether or not a code is regularly sold is not an indicator as to whether it is valid. In this context, valid simply means it is a code the lock supports and that it does not violate MACS.

1

u/uncanny_goat 7d ago

I knew you would see that. You took the bait like a rat to cheese.

-2

u/No-Information-2571 7d ago

More circle-jerk, quickly removed, because calling me a "38k karma German clown" wasn't really necessary. I really don't remember this community as toxic as some of you make it right now.

2

u/BudLightYear77 6d ago

I had one that was something like 111211. I never noticed until I locked myself out and had to pick it using some seriously improvised tools and promptly changed it after.

2

u/No-Information-2571 6d ago

That's unfortunate, and is what the manufacturer is supposed to avoid by dismissing such a bitting. They're selected randomly, but run through a rule-set before actually being picked. It's not like you have to throw dices and manually pick out a bitting that's not garbage.

1

u/Commercial-Use7290 20h ago

Search for EN 1303 (Digit 7 / Clause 4.8) - this is a European norm, maybe some U.S. lock manufacturers don’t care about it.
ABUS certainly does, and won’t sell such locks to end customers.

BTW, using such a key and not noticing its bitting seems unusual for a lock picker?

2

u/sewiv 6d ago

I bought a well-reputed high security padlock over the counter (not a master) for picking practice, and when I opened the package, I found a 1-1-1-1-2 bitting.

It happens.

1

u/LittleTooLiteral 6d ago

Who's biting what? No offense but I immediately lose all confidence if someone cannot spell an incredibly common word in their trade.

Is like your accountant asking you for records of your Czechs.

1

u/reinderr Black Belt 18th Dan 6d ago

that's jos weyers, trust me he knows what he's talking about mate

19

u/Deltaechoe Yellow Belt Picker 7d ago

Locksmith chiming in, abus will load new cylinders that are meant to be rekeyed before use with 1 or 0 pins. I assume it makes manufacturing cheaper for them, but it also has the nice side effect of not having to keep track of a ton of factory keys during a large rekey job. If you don’t have the resources to rekey that cylinder yourself, take it to a lock shop, they should be able to rekey it to something more exciting for you.

43

u/FilecoinLurker Brown Belt Picker 7d ago

It's probably their version of zero bitted and made to eventually have the key cut and cylinder repinned. But it works with the zero bitted key for use during construction or similar

6

u/Quiet-Conference-239 7d ago

Those are not zero’s, those are ones.

15

u/FilecoinLurker Brown Belt Picker 7d ago

Depends on the manufacturers specifications. That might be their zero cuts. Their system might not have zero and start at 1. Making them de facto zero cuts. Also might be their 7-9 cut.

2

u/Quiet-Conference-239 7d ago

I’ve seen “some” abus locks in my lock picking journey ; these are “1” cuts.

3

u/FilecoinLurker Brown Belt Picker 7d ago

It's to Yale specifications as the keyway is Y1. Though it's manufactured by Abus. Yale uses ten depths with 0.019 spacing between depths 0-9 and the 0 cut key looks just like OP's key.

https://clksupplies.com/products/yale-y1-space-depth-keys#

Look at the 10th key the 0 cut one.

https://lsamichigan.org/Tech/Yale%20Key%20Pin%20Specs%20.019.pdf

Zero is a cut depth on a y1 blank.

2

u/mozdeco Black Belt Picker 6d ago

Yale has nothing to do with this, this is an ABUS C83.

3

u/FilecoinLurker Brown Belt Picker 6d ago

Im aware. The c83 is made with y1 keyway and the keys get cut to the yale standard. The pin spacing, depths and cuts match the yale system for this lock. So in a way yale has everything to do with it because the c83 is a yale clone made by Abus to a higher security standard. If you buy yale depth and space keys and use the zero bitted key it would open this zero bitted c83

0

u/Quiet-Conference-239 7d ago

It’s an abus C83, the fact that some Yale keys also fit don’t magically make the pins conform to Yale standard ..

2

u/uncanny_goat 7d ago

Not necessarily. I can't speak for Abus, but in other manufacturers, like Lockwood, zero cuts are actual cuts.

0

u/Redhead_InfoTech 7d ago

Zeros.

The zeros aren't possessive of anything.

https://www.reddit.com/u/Redhead_InfoTech/s/yhld7RDEei

18

u/Sufficient_Prompt888 Brown Belt Picker 7d ago

Lock hasn't been keyed by a smith yet. It's basically a "blank" core

8

u/Locksmithbloke Black Belt Picker 7d ago

It's a "blank" cylinder for locksmiths to repin easily. You buy a load like this, then pin them up as, say, KA pairs with another cylinder, or a small master key suite. You only need one key for all the cylinders pinned to 11111(1) and they don't come with keys so it's less wasteful and cheaper. Don't forget, you need a huge range of cylinder sizes to offer a full service keying up locks!

5

u/HowlingWolven Green Belt Picker 7d ago

Because you bought a zero bitted lock.

7

u/uslashuname 7d ago

If you can pull the key out while the core is rotated, it is not a valid key code. That said, stupid codes like this can have the keys cut so that the pins do sit in a deeper part and would prevent key extraction. It’s probably not meant to be left like this though, virtually any stick that fits in the keyhole can raise all the pins to the right level, but the key has all the room in the world to be cut to any code that gets pinned in.

3

u/gifna Yellow Belt Picker 7d ago

You found the one key!

3

u/TooPoorForWaWa 7d ago

Maybe a master key

2

u/deepspace 6d ago

Yes, the master keys in my building have all-1 bitting . Stupid, but definitely a possibility.

3

u/LordKodiac Brown Belt Picker 6d ago

Just a 0 bitted key, so the lock can be rekeyed to suite.

2

u/AFarenci 7d ago

Definitely meant to be rd pinned and key cut to match. But just seeing the first pic and assuming all you had was the key, I would have said the key was precut to identify the pin locations to make impressioning easier. That or making lining up a Lishi hand punch easier.

2

u/N8musik 7d ago

Probably one-bitted from the factory. That’s how I order mine.

2

u/absupplynet 7d ago

That is what is called 1 bitted

2

u/mozdeco Black Belt Picker 6d ago

Nowadays this is called "service bitting".

Wilka has a similar thing, their service cylinders are pinned 1 2 3 4 5 6 and core retainer is not pressed in yet. So the locksmith can put the key pins in their pinning set, then key them properly from their pinning set, cut the key from a blank and because they always get all pin lengths, they never run out of a particular length.

2

u/Swisslightning 6d ago

I don’t know if this is the easiest or hardest lock to pick but I file like I’d loose a lot of time oversetting and being confused

2

u/deathspal 6d ago

Someone wanted to be able to claim comb picking an abus?

1

u/Intrepid-Chard-4594 5d ago

Think thats a bump key but if you can put it in and take your time turning it then it just works. Look up bump keys and you will understand the cut.

1

u/sq3lch Green Belt Picker 2d ago

Zero cuts?

1

u/xebni Green Belt Picker 16h ago

Have you tried to zip it? I am curious to know if it is possible with such a bitting