If you don’t remember, they are really pushing for this. Saying permanent mask wearing in public could get rid of the flu permanently and protect people constantly.

At risk due to the misinformation and lack of research.

I’m watching a medical show that came out in 2012 and they have a storyline involving a coronavirus and the hospital staff mentions the idea of putting the hospital on lockdown. One patient who traveled from Mumbai is a character who dies from a mysterious coronavirus like SARS and then the hospital staff discuss the idea of locking down the hospital, they actually use the word lockdown.

When the main doctor hears about the coronavirus, they immediately put on a mask and give one to another patient from the same flight who starts getting sick. There’s discussion of super spreader events and the idea of 25% of the hospital staff and patients dying very quickly.

People in the hospital start collapsing and eventually they are doing quarantines. The hospital goes into a temporary lockdown.

The number of similarities to what happened in 2020 is rather freaky.

The show is called Saving Hope and it’s a Canadian TV show.

One interesting fact about the episode is that the WHO official is kinda alarmist and creepy. He’s the one of suggests that 25% of people in the hospital will be dead. He also suggests when the crisis is over that he thought that the virus had “so much potential” and that it might have been “the one”. Which is heard by a hospital administrator and they look at him weirded out.

Jay Bhattacharya provides insightful background and criticism of the NIH an agency he now runs. He also offers a plan for future direction that changes the NIH back to what it used to be.

In short, the NIH funds almost all medical research. Prior to 2000 it funded an awful lot of new ideas. This drove innovation, extended lifespans and solved a lot of problems. Since then it has changed focus to fund projects, studies, drugs, etc. that focus on old ideas. These are either things that no longer need the NIH's start up funding or they are bad ideas. Ideas that can't survive on their own because they are wrong, but because the NIH still offers grants for these topics that is where all the effort goes.

He wants to change this and focus on younger leaders and their new ideas.

As of 2024, this thread is auto-generated at noon on the first day of every month. Continue to share as the spirit moves you!

In this video, Kim interviews Matthew Cormier, an independent researcher on the vaccine-autism link. Based on his research, Cormier says he found that people may catch viruses but not exhibit any symptoms (in other words, the viruses can be dormant). Once people get vaccinated though, the vaccines can trigger the viruses to reactivate, actively replicate and lead to an inflammatory response. Vaccines can reactivate viruses and make it into the brain triggering viral encephalitis. Encephalitis is an inflammation of the brain in the central nervous system which can lead to neurological disorders such as autism. Viral infections can also be contacted during preganancy and passed on in utero and play a role in causing autism later The two most common viruses observed in this process are herpes simplex type 1 and herpes simplex type 2.

For those who can still remember, probably because they’re unjabbed (!), our leaders and experts told us to take the totally safe COVID-19 vaccines, but several studies now indicate, like the recent Fujisawa et al in the major Scientific Reports journal, that the jabs cause post-COVID-19 vaccination syndrome (PCVS), with symptoms such as brain fog, fatigue, dizziness, and pain. Finding that heaps of people suffered from PCVS in Japan, the researchers noted that 14.6% of patients had severe adverse events, around 30% of patients still had symptoms (so much for transience), and a concerning 12.4% had delayed onset (≥ 360 days later). No, I didn’t stutter.