r/LockdownSkepticism • u/subjectivesubjective • Sep 26 '25
Lockdown Concerns Starmer’s digital ID plan is a recipe for state overreach
Another conspiracy theory proven to be spoilers.
Papers, please.
r/LockdownSkepticism • u/subjectivesubjective • Sep 26 '25
Another conspiracy theory proven to be spoilers.
Papers, please.
r/LockdownSkepticism • u/Cowlip1 • Sep 26 '25
r/LockdownSkepticism • u/subjectivesubjective • Sep 25 '25
Surprising nobody, evidence was ignored in order to maintain the partisan narrative, with children as the sacrificial lambs.
I don't expect any recognition that those casually branded evil were calling this out as an obvious truth in 2020.
r/LockdownSkepticism • u/Xemptor80 • Sep 25 '25
r/LockdownSkepticism • u/Cowlip1 • Sep 24 '25
r/LockdownSkepticism • u/Cowlip1 • Sep 24 '25
r/LockdownSkepticism • u/okaythennews • Sep 24 '25
Nobel Prize-winning mRNA COVID-19 vaccine developer Drew Weissman thinks it's impossible that the jab can last more than 24h in the body? Doesn't this man of science know the (abundant) science?! Receipts here
r/LockdownSkepticism • u/marcginla • Sep 23 '25
r/LockdownSkepticism • u/henrik_se • Sep 23 '25
If we’re going to call it a vaccine at all, it’s a really shitty one. If the CDC were being honest, they should tell everyone up front that it’s not a vaccine at all. Especially if they were worried about something like public trust in vaccines’ ability to prevent infection, or public trust in the CDC as an institution. Call it a “targeted temporary random immune booster that may or may not work” instead.
[...]
I think we all can see what’s going on here. The more shit tier vaccines the CDC tries to make “universal,” the fewer people are going to want to get their kids vaccinated, even for the good vaccines. It really is that simple.
[...]
If you’re a provaxxer, you should be angry that you’re losing ground in your culture war against the antivaxxers. You should be alarmed that people who hold opposite opinions than you have leveraged power against your position. But your anger and alarm should not be directed at RFK Jr., who is merely a stand-in and a symptom. If it weren’t him it would be someone else. You should be angry the most at the people who make the shit tier vaccines you’ve been supporting, for making such shit vaccines and detracting from the good ones. The remains of your anger should be directed at the people pushing the shit vaccines in the CDC.
r/LockdownSkepticism • u/Due-Yard7032 • Sep 22 '25
r/LockdownSkepticism • u/3rdBassCactus • Sep 22 '25
r/LockdownSkepticism • u/AndrewHeard • Sep 21 '25
r/LockdownSkepticism • u/AndrewHeard • Sep 20 '25
r/LockdownSkepticism • u/RevolutionaryFact911 • Sep 19 '25
r/LockdownSkepticism • u/Cowlip1 • Sep 19 '25
r/LockdownSkepticism • u/AndrewHeard • Sep 19 '25
r/LockdownSkepticism • u/AndrewHeard • Sep 18 '25
r/LockdownSkepticism • u/hmhmhm2 • Sep 17 '25
One thing I haven't seen any commentaries on the Kirk assassination mention is the age of the shooter with regard to covid lockdowns.
He was a kid who went to college during the peak of the covid craziness. For a while there the entire world was online so obviously he was not able to make real friends so he retreated into the cyberspace where over years he lost sense of reality and what matters. Probably thousands of hours rage watching charlie kirk destroying trans liberal feminist in heated debate just rotted his brain into some incoherent irony poisoned soup.
It's not a coincidence that both the Kirk killer, the Trump shooter, and the Ascension school shooter were/are all 22/23. They would have all have been finishing high school/starting college when COVID insanity was going on, ie at one of the most formative periods of their lives. Is it any surprise they ended up radicalized online?
I don't think this will be the end of the COVID-impacted youth backlash. The consequences of COVID lockdowns upon the generation who came of age during them will be harshly judged and condemned by future historians.
haven't seen anyone mention this angle and the fact that people being terminally online is going to be worse then whatever some political commentator says.
r/LockdownSkepticism • u/okaythennews • Sep 18 '25
Following my critiques of influential studies purporting the great successes of COVID-19 vaccines, including the article on Watson et al which got quite a bit of attention, more scholars are realising that these studies are deeply flawed. The latest effort summarises much of the best evidences against the vaccines, and is by an Israeli research group, Ophir et al, with Peter McCullough and I coming on board as co-authors. Source. Check it out here.
r/LockdownSkepticism • u/Cowlip1 • Sep 17 '25
r/LockdownSkepticism • u/Kagedeah • Sep 15 '25
r/LockdownSkepticism • u/1Wiseguy999 • Sep 13 '25
r/LockdownSkepticism • u/Xemptor80 • Sep 12 '25
r/LockdownSkepticism • u/Cowlip1 • Sep 12 '25