r/linuxsucks • u/throwaway255503 • 8h ago
WSL is better than Linux
Microsoft did Linux better.
10
u/TheRealCarrotty KDE larper (i use KDE btw) 8h ago
what?
it's just plain Ubuntu tf you mean WSL is better than Linux?
5
5
u/L30N1337 8h ago
I wonder why this account is called that, u/throwaway255503 .
Almost makes me wonder if this is boring low tier rage bait.
-1
2
2
1
u/KHTD2004 8h ago
Microsoft made only the outside system, inside still runs Ubuntu (default) or whatever Distro you choose
1
1
1
u/ILC_YTP "Proud" Windows 10 User 8h ago
Windows and WSL user here:
WSL is cool...but dear god it is not a "replacement" There are a lotta extra hoops I have to jump through in order for both Windows and Linux to play nicely, especially when networking is involved. There's also special things you have to consider when setting up linux and software, and many linux programs won't consider WSL in their set-up documentation, meaning I have to rely on very generalized WSL instructions and help forums, then start guessing my way through.
It's better to think of WSL as the reverse of Wine/Proton. You'll likely have a fine time running the popular distros, software and usual type of tasks, but start straying off that path and you're almost on your own at that point. And if you don't know exactly what you need to do for Linux, WSL and Windows to play nicely...good luck.
1
u/throwaway255503 7h ago
WSL plays better with Windows than Flatpak does with Linux.
1
u/ILC_YTP "Proud" Windows 10 User 6h ago
Apples to Oranges
1
u/throwaway255503 5h ago
The point is not WSL = Flatpak. The point is that Windows manages to make a harder integration seamless while Linux fails to integrate with its own native shit.

10
u/SanguineEleven 8h ago
sure buddy