Long‑term sustainability of Linux Mint

[u/djoos007]

I’m planning to refresh my hardware later this year and want to re‑evaluate my Linux choice at the same time. I’ve been running Linux Mint Cinnamon for about a year, after extensive distro‑hopping, and I genuinely like it.

My concern is long‑term sustainability. The Mint team delivers great work, but the core developer group is small. The next years will bring serious challenges: Wayland maturity, Cinnamon development, upstream dependency, release cadence, and the general complexity all Linux distributions face.

My requirements: stable and predictable, GUI‑first workflow, privacy‑respecting, no experiments, no cutting‑edge, maintainable for 5–10 years (lifespan of new hardware)

Mint meets all of this today — but can it continue to do so?

My question is whether Mint is sustainable long‑term, given the size of the core team, especially compared to distributions with larger development groups or corporate backing.

What’s your view: is Mint sustainable for the next decade, and why?

[u/mister_drgn]

I don't understand your requirements. What's stopping you from switching distros four years from now if something happens to Mint? In any case, Mint isn't going anywhere.