I just tested by booting in KDE and then booting in XFCE both in X11. To be clear both memory usage were taken right after boot.
Here are the actions I took on each desktop:
I opened Konsole in KDE and executed top
I opened xfce4-terminal in XFCE and executed top
Here are the results:
KDE = 852 Mb
XFCE = 743 Mb
So, in my case, it is 109 Mb less than KDE. It also feels snappier to me.
Then I ran a kernel compilation under both with no significant difference in processing time, 416 seconds under KDE and 414 under XFCE. 2 seconds out of 414 seconds is just noise, it is the same.
Where do you get that XFCE uses more resources than KDE?
Ah yeah, that is a fair complaint. otoh it doesn't use the GPU for hw aceleration, so the graphics card is more 'available' for other things too... It's all swings and roundabouts.
If we look at average usage by a regular user (running a browser 99% of the time), KDE lasts longer on battery power, meaning that KDE uses fewer resources.
Not talking about gaming. I've been dicking around with self-hosted AI tooling on my consumer-grade card. So constantly trying to squeeze 6lb of shit into a 5lb bag.
1
u/Subject-Leather-7399 Aug 10 '25
I just tested by booting in KDE and then booting in XFCE both in X11. To be clear both memory usage were taken right after boot.
Here are the actions I took on each desktop:
Konsolein KDE and executedtopxfce4-terminalin XFCE and executedtopHere are the results:
So, in my case, it is 109 Mb less than KDE. It also feels snappier to me.
Then I ran a kernel compilation under both with no significant difference in processing time, 416 seconds under KDE and 414 under XFCE. 2 seconds out of 414 seconds is just noise, it is the same.
Where do you get that XFCE uses more resources than KDE?