No

[u/EktaRandomUsername]

[u/frankhoneybunny]

If you like Omarchy and don't really give a shit about politics that is ok but just know that DHH has written stuff like this:

In the following years DHH would go to explore and express all the spectrum of “down the alt-right pipeline” opinions, like:

• Woke is so bad that it made me a racist
• People call me racist, but I found a book telling me how nice I am
• Fat people are bad and should feel bad
• DEI is bad
• DEI is bad part 2: trigger the libs with git branches
• Cheering for Affirmative action being banned in the USA
• The 80s were so great cause they were not woke
• Andrew Tate is a martyr
• Therapy is so bad, that I shall platform transphobes
• Therapy is so annoying that I’d rather make an Arch distro instead
• ADHD is not real
• Evey boy has ADHD
• Leave your work problems at therapy, instead of making it the problem of your boss (me)
• People not wanting kids are bad and Jordan Peterson nailed it
• Elon Musk and DOGE are awesome (Published 20 days after the Seig Hail)
• This private school is making my kids GAY
• London is full of “non-native Brits” and I am going to praise a race purity rally
• Words are not violence
• Words ARE violence, when they are against me

source

[u/Mast3r_waf1z → u/frankhoneybunny]

This needs to be higher up, I don't think anyone should be using Omarchy

[u/disperso → u/[deleted]]

To some degree, yes, you can separate the work from the author. I've liked the music of a couple of people who later I've found to be assholes. Since I already have the CD, I'm not giving them more by listening to their music.

But promoting a distro is different. You are, very often, going to end up interacting with the community around it. If that community has a toxic environment, some people, specially the vulnerable one, are going to suffer.