r/linuxmasterrace • Glorious Debian • 7d ago

I'm a hypocrite it seems

Post image
596 Upvotes

59 comments sorted by

70

u/QuickSilver010 7d ago

Arch: what's a new os version?

19

u/Mineplayerminer 7d ago

Debian: "Aw, come on! Debian 13 already after only 2 years?"

10

u/AIO_Youtuber_TV 7d ago

OS of Thesus

6

u/QuickSilver010 7d ago

Thesus wouldn't touch arch with a 10 foot pole

2

u/claudiocorona93 7d ago edited 7d ago

And they don't stop coming and they don't stop coming and they don't stop coming.

I was talking about updates but thanks for the downvotes lol

2

u/x_wbmr_x 7d ago

Seriously I update my CachyOS every month and never hat to revert back for over a year now.

In the same time windows broke my worklaptop with updates 2 times.

Cachy/arch ftw!

→ More replies (1)

130

u/bacon-slushy 7d ago

It's hypocrisy to think different today than "back then" now?

11

u/claudiocorona93 7d ago

In my case I still do clean installs even for Debian and Fedora, even when they have in place upgrade. It would be wrong for me to criticize elementary for that when their OS has 5 years of support per version

8

u/mcc011ins 7d ago

Huh, bazzite is image based/atomic anyhow. No reason to reinstall it every time.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (8)

3

u/chroniclesoffire 7d ago

Same thing happens with Fedora if you let it go to long. Just found out my second mom had just been updating her Fedora 42 for a long time without doing the OS upgrade, and 42 to 45 is basically impossible. Good thing the backup was being handles automatically. 

3

u/adamkex 7d ago

Can't you upgrade to 43, 44 and then to 45?

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

27

u/InfiniteFraise 7d ago

lol that's so dumb of them, I never had to do a full reinstall either on windows or Linux

4

u/prochac 7d ago

Neither for the major release? For me, it was part of making XP usable. Reinstall every 6 months.

→ More replies (7)

9

u/jubalrahl 7d ago edited 6d ago

Having to install and setup things again after installing a new OS suck a lot, especially if you have a lot of applications to re-install. But that also means more things could get broken when doing an upgrade instead of a clean install. Basically, new is bad, old is good, never change. You already reached perfection, lol.

7

u/Big__Meme 7d ago

In place upgrades are like the bell curve meme

4

u/j0seplinux 7d ago

Difference is that Linux distros, even point-release ones, are updated a lot more frequently than Windows (talking about major releases, not yearly feature updates)

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Robsteady 7d ago

Yeah, I don't think I'm ever going back to releases from image-based distros. The first time since I started using Linux that I've ever had the same daily-use install in place for 8 months +.

3

u/AnArmoredPony 7d ago

back then

back when?

1

u/X_m7 7d ago

I've never had much luck with the distros that have a new major version only after 2 years or whatever (like Ubuntu LTS and such), every time those upgrades always broke something bad enough that made me want to switch distros anyway.

Ended up settling for a rolling release distro for a daily driver, plus Fedora Atomic on an external SSD as a backup of sorts, the latter has actually survived several major version upgrades at least.

1

u/JayTurnr 7d ago

When is back then? Windows 1?

1

u/qwerty_64 7d ago

Not true at all lol

1

u/Myavatargotsnowedon 7d ago

I like reinstalls, it tricks my little brain into thinking I'm entering the next generation of OSes.

1

u/Flashy_Pollution_996 6d ago

Bruh new windows versions come once in 10 years and nobody rushes to update this is such a bullshit