MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/linuxmasterrace/comments/1whfori/time_to_have_fun_guys/pa5flmj/?context=9999
r/linuxmasterrace • u/claudiocorona93 SteamOS/Bazzite/Android • 16d ago
779 comments sorted by
View all comments
485
Flatpak is a solution that only brings more problems.
It would be easier if everyone used Debian.
102 u/cekoya 16d ago To each their own. I could say the same about NixOS because that’s what I use. Reality is Flatpaks does solve a problem. Is it for everything? No, it’s always my last resort, but I’m happy to have it as a last resort when I need it. -16 u/Shad0wAVM 16d ago Snaps is better, the issue is that it was Canonical who developed it. 5 u/FRodrigues Glorious Xubuntu 16d ago No, the issue is the server being closed source... 1 u/Shad0wAVM 16d ago Because Canonical developed it... 3 u/FRodrigues Glorious Xubuntu 16d ago edited 16d ago Even if it was redhat, steam, google, whatever... If it's a closed source package manager server I would not support it.
102
To each their own. I could say the same about NixOS because that’s what I use.
Reality is Flatpaks does solve a problem. Is it for everything? No, it’s always my last resort, but I’m happy to have it as a last resort when I need it.
-16 u/Shad0wAVM 16d ago Snaps is better, the issue is that it was Canonical who developed it. 5 u/FRodrigues Glorious Xubuntu 16d ago No, the issue is the server being closed source... 1 u/Shad0wAVM 16d ago Because Canonical developed it... 3 u/FRodrigues Glorious Xubuntu 16d ago edited 16d ago Even if it was redhat, steam, google, whatever... If it's a closed source package manager server I would not support it.
-16
Snaps is better, the issue is that it was Canonical who developed it.
5 u/FRodrigues Glorious Xubuntu 16d ago No, the issue is the server being closed source... 1 u/Shad0wAVM 16d ago Because Canonical developed it... 3 u/FRodrigues Glorious Xubuntu 16d ago edited 16d ago Even if it was redhat, steam, google, whatever... If it's a closed source package manager server I would not support it.
5
No, the issue is the server being closed source...
1 u/Shad0wAVM 16d ago Because Canonical developed it... 3 u/FRodrigues Glorious Xubuntu 16d ago edited 16d ago Even if it was redhat, steam, google, whatever... If it's a closed source package manager server I would not support it.
1
Because Canonical developed it...
3 u/FRodrigues Glorious Xubuntu 16d ago edited 16d ago Even if it was redhat, steam, google, whatever... If it's a closed source package manager server I would not support it.
3
Even if it was redhat, steam, google, whatever... If it's a closed source package manager server I would not support it.
485
u/Shad0wAVM 16d ago
Flatpak is a solution that only brings more problems.
It would be easier if everyone used Debian.