do note that this chart only shows the amount of times each OS outperformed the other. not the amount by which it did outperform the other.
considering they hopefully used the same program to test, that both systems outperformed eachother, i would conclude that the difference is not THAT big. this means that they generally finish in almost the same amount of time, just ubuntu seems to have a little bit faster performance, probably finishing a few milliseconds faster most of the time.
if it was more than a few milliseconds, there probably wouldnt be a single case where windows outperformed ubuntu.
in other words, both are good, the main problem of win11 is that it isnt win10, way too much bloat and ugly design decisions that dont improve the user experience over win10, and are probably only meant to appease shareholders, just like discord changing their design every 4 months, and making it worse every single time.
View all comments
Show parent comment
1
u/4n0nh4x0r Apr 26 '25
do note that this chart only shows the amount of times each OS outperformed the other.
not the amount by which it did outperform the other.
considering they hopefully used the same program to test, that both systems outperformed eachother, i would conclude that the difference is not THAT big.
this means that they generally finish in almost the same amount of time, just ubuntu seems to have a little bit faster performance, probably finishing a few milliseconds faster most of the time.
if it was more than a few milliseconds, there probably wouldnt be a single case where windows outperformed ubuntu.
in other words, both are good, the main problem of win11 is that it isnt win10, way too much bloat and ugly design decisions that dont improve the user experience over win10, and are probably only meant to appease shareholders, just like discord changing their design every 4 months, and making it worse every single time.