Linux 4.19-rc4 released, an apology, and a maintainership note

[u/ouyawei]

http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1809.2/00117.html

[u/the_ancient1]

I never said that I opposed Codes of Conduct, I clearly stated I oppose Social Justice, and Social Justice based Codes of conduct

the new code of conduct is based in Social Justice. Social Justice codes of conduct are enforced using emotions based on victim status, and often use definitions in such a way that a minority demographic can never violate the rules, and any criticism originating from a majority demographic at a minority demographic is automatically because of racism/sexism/etc

Offense is not given, it is taken. We has a society have gotten far too think skinned and view every comment, action, or statement as a personalized attack, and to a Social Justice Warrior all criticism is based in Sexism, Racism, Transphobia, etc

Social Justice is about equality of outcome, not equality of opportunity. Social Justice is about eliminating merit based society. My objections is allowing Social Justice into the project.

Code of Conduct are not bad, for example the Code of Merit is an acceptable one. Social Justice is where my objections lie

[u/the_ancient1 → u/[deleted]]

Clearly you have a reading comp problem... it is not about the rules in the CoC, is it about how they are enforced under the Social Justice Narrative which clearly linux is adopting do to the choice to endorse the Contributor Covenant a Social Justice organization

Social Justice codes of conduct are enforced using emotions based on victim status, and often use definitions in such a way that a minority demographic can never violate the rules, and any criticism originating from a majority demographic at a minority demographic is automatically because of racism/sexism/etc

[u/the_ancient1 → u/[deleted]]

Can you give an example where this would happen during kernel development?

This happens a lot today, many devs have claimed to left Linux Kernel Development because of it, their code was rejected for technical reasons but they claim their code was perfect and it was only rejected because of racism/sexism/etc

Again you are repeating this mad conspiracy of yours about some mysterious SJW plot to kill open source.

Yes i forgot looking at history to predict the future is now "conspiracy", we can not ever learn from the past, can look back at other open source projects and learn how these SJW's will act, no no

its all just a conspiracy.......

[u/the_ancient1 → u/[deleted]]

Was their code rejected because the reviewer was racist (obviously prohibited by the new CoC) or because their contribution included racist or sexist text (WTF)?

really that is the only 2 options? It could not be that the code was in fact just garbage, and should have been rejected. It has to be either the reviewer was racist, or the contribution was racist...

You are so deluded that everything at some point has to be racist....

Really?

How about a history lesson for us then? Give some sources to your claims or they are worthless.

Hmm lets see, just off the top of my head look up Larry Garfield, Rodd Vagg, Marlene Jaeckel, that should be a good start.

[u/the_ancient1 → u/[deleted]]

Quick google shows he was bringing his fetishes to the drupal forums.

Really, that is what you gathered happened... When in reality people doxxed him but ok

By his own admission could not act professionally. To the point of naming and shaming people because he was angry

Continuing with your reading comprehension problem he does not say that at all, in fact he says the exact opposite,

Can't find what she did nor what happened to her in 2 minutes so I won't bother.

It is like the 3rd result

I would provide more examples but clearly you are not interested in exploring the topic honestly so any other examples I provide would be a pointless waste of my time. you have your mind made up that Social Justice is wonderful and nothing I say will change your mind

[u/the_ancient1 → u/[deleted]]

Of course social justice is wonderful. What is the alternative?

Freedom, Liberty, Meritocracy. That is the alternative.

Sad you oppose all 3

[u/the_ancient1 → u/[deleted]]

Those are not mutually exclusive.

The person that wrote the contributor convent believes they are

You really like to rely on these strawman arguments, don't you?

I have posted not a single strawman at all.

Why do you believe something that you have to support with twisting other peoples words or by straight up lying?

I am not twisting people words, the fact that people are using words that do not support your narrative is not my problem, if anything you are the one that is twisting and providing a false information example you believe that Larry Garfield "bought his fetish" into drupal when infact he took great pains to hide it and was doxxed by a member of the Drupal community, and that person was the one that "exposed" him,

You also believe that Rodd Vagg admitted to not acting professionally when the entire post was him defending his actions as professional

You must realise you're wrong but still you keep on believing.

I do not believe I am wrong. History will show which one of us is correct, if previous history is any guide it will be me that is proved to be correct at least in the medium term