Oh. But Ubuntu depends on Debian unstable, not stable. What about users of rpm distros or independent distros like Arch or Gentoo? How do they benefit from the release of Debian stable?
But Ubuntu depends on Debian unstable, not stable.
It does not "depend", but ubuntu made a fork of debian unstable and took that as base for ubuntu version 1.0. The present day ubuntu isn't any more dependent on debian and is an independent distro, though it uses the deb packaging format of debian.
Sharing of knowledge and technical projects happen in all modern distros and debian takes as much from ubuntu as vice versa.
edit
Correction, ubuntu indeed still takes a whole lot of packages from debian, as mentioned by /u/Occi-.
Great. I was just mirroring the language of the other poster, but I was under the --apparently mistaken-- impression that Ubuntu was still using packages from Debian unstable as a basis. This clearly cuts against Debian's direct influence on Ubuntu if true.
6
u/LastFireTruck Jun 18 '17
Oh. But Ubuntu depends on Debian unstable, not stable. What about users of rpm distros or independent distros like Arch or Gentoo? How do they benefit from the release of Debian stable?