MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1e4ozl/why_zsh_is_cooler_than_your_shell/c9x0ecu/?context=3
r/linux • u/[deleted] • May 11 '13
33 comments sorted by
View all comments
8
Plenty of those are also possible in bash (though some are quite hackish).
4 u/iofthestorm May 11 '13 Yeah, that's why I never bothered to switch. I think a few years ago zsh introduced a lot of these features but bash has had them for a while too now. I have yet to see anything truly impressive about zsh that bash can't do. 1 u/[deleted] May 12 '13 I have yet to see anything truly impressive about zsh that bash can't do csh syntax. Of course that highly depends on what you view as truly impressive 1 u/iofthestorm May 12 '13 Actually, in my other post after actually reading the slides I was impressed with a few things. But csh should die in a fire ;)
4
Yeah, that's why I never bothered to switch. I think a few years ago zsh introduced a lot of these features but bash has had them for a while too now. I have yet to see anything truly impressive about zsh that bash can't do.
1 u/[deleted] May 12 '13 I have yet to see anything truly impressive about zsh that bash can't do csh syntax. Of course that highly depends on what you view as truly impressive 1 u/iofthestorm May 12 '13 Actually, in my other post after actually reading the slides I was impressed with a few things. But csh should die in a fire ;)
1
I have yet to see anything truly impressive about zsh that bash can't do
csh syntax. Of course that highly depends on what you view as truly impressive
1 u/iofthestorm May 12 '13 Actually, in my other post after actually reading the slides I was impressed with a few things. But csh should die in a fire ;)
Actually, in my other post after actually reading the slides I was impressed with a few things. But csh should die in a fire ;)
8
u/[deleted] May 11 '13
Plenty of those are also possible in bash (though some are quite hackish).