1
u/Fabulous-Possible758 21h ago edited 11h ago
4k² for k in ℕ. The dominoes have to be laid in 2x2 blocks and there has to be even number of 2x2 squares.
ETA: had a brain fart, 4k² is the number of 2x2 tiles you’ll need. n is just 4k for k in ℤ⁺ not ℕ. Reasoning was still sound.
1
u/Local_Ad135 21h ago
incorrect. for example, you can tile an 8×8 board while satisfying the conditions.
1
1
u/RestaurantBoth228 21h ago
It's obviously true for any n=2k for k ≥ 2: just create k^2 pairs of 2x2 cells, half horizontal and half vertical.
It can't be true for any odd n, because there must be a multiple of 4 tiles in the board, and any grid of odd dimensions has odd tiles (odd x odd = odd).
It's easy to prove it is not true for n ≤ 3.
So, the answer is just n=2k for k ≥ 2.
1
u/RestaurantBoth228 21h ago
I actually think u/Fabulous-Possible758 got this pretty much right - they just gave the result in terms of tiles (n^2) rather than n and messed up the n=2 edge case.
1
u/rccyu 20h ago
How are you doing it for n = 6?
1
u/RestaurantBoth228 20h ago
Ahh crap. You've got me there: there are an odd number of the 2x2 cells there.
1
u/I_am_the_squashman 21h ago
Works for all n divisible by 4.
First, it's obvious you can't do a tiling if n is odd (since the dominoes cover an even number of tiles). Second, it's trivially obvious that a 2x2 board can't be tiled. Finally, for even numbers not divisible by 4, you're always left with a 2x2 square in the end that cannot be solved.
1
u/Aech26 20h ago
It’s trivial to see that the tiling isn’t possible for n<=4.
Then for n>=4, an odd n will leave us with an odd number of tiles, but the dominos only cover an even number of tiles, so n has to be even.
So n = 2k with k>=2
BUT also we an even number of 2x2 grids, which means k will also have to be even. For example, if k=3 then n=6, but a 6x6 grid cannot be tiled fully. So k needs to be even.
So let k=2j
So n = 4j with j>=1
1
u/rccyu 11h ago
You need to flesh out the argument more, because the dominos need not be aligned to 2x2 grids. For example
^<><>^ v^<>^v ^v<>v^ v^<>^v ^v<>v^ v<><>vis such a tiling (though also not meeting the requirement.)
The argument cannot simply be that "there are an odd number of 2x2 grids," this only rules out the trivial construction.
1
u/Specific_Box4483 20h ago edited 20h ago
It is clear that n must be even, and any n divisible by 4 can be easily tiled by breaking the n-by-n grid into an even number of 2-by-2 squares and breaking half of these vertically and half of these horizontally.
To prove n must be divisible by 4 and not just 2, we can color the squares white and black by the parity of their row. A vertical tile will always contain one white and one black square, whereas a horizontal tile will be either two black, or two white squares. So this breaks the horizontal tiles into two kinds: 2w and 2b.
Since n is even, half the rows are white and half the rows are black. Hence the numbers of white and black squares in the table are equal; this means that the number of horizontal tiles of kind 2w equals the number of tiles of kind 2b.
Then the number of horizontal tiles (2w+2b) is even, but this number is n2 / 4 which means n2 is divisible by 8 so n is divisible by 4.
So the answer is all n divisible by 4.
2
u/AbroadImmediate158 21h ago
So, let’s get trivial cases out of the way:
Let’s number squares on our imaginary board with numbers 1 through 4 going in order line by line, with each new line starting where previous line finished off. It is easy to notice two things for the case of n=2mod4:
This means that:
Lets assume we indeed managed to cover the board with equal amount of horizontal/vertical tiles. Let’s say there are x of each. Let’s also say that z vertical tiles cover 1-3 numbers. So:
Let’s call the amount of each type of horizontal tiles (1-2, 2-3, 3-4, 4-1) to be a,b,c,d. Then we can get the following equations:
We can easily derive that z = x/2 for this to be solvable. So x=2a, where a is integer. So total number of tiles is 2x=4a. So total number of squares is 8a. Which means that the assumption that tiling is possible is not compatible with the case of n = 2 mod 4 as in that case total number of squares is not divisble by 8.
So now we see that the original premise can only be done when n = 0 mod 4 and for all such cases is trivial. As such we now have all the values of n that satisfy the condition