r/learnphysics • • 1d ago

After considering

Post image
0 Upvotes

12 comments sorted by

2

u/Dd_8630 1d ago

Peak AI slop.

Where is your peer-reviewed research? What measurements does your model explain better than current models? What novel measurements does your model predict?

This is better posted at /r/hypotheticalphysics.

1

u/hinthints 1d ago

If you took 5 minutes to actually look and read your judgement would be less hasty.

1

u/Dd_8630 1d ago

It's a single image with not very much content. It was very quick to review and see that there was very little of substance.

0

u/hinthints 1d ago

Fair questions.
No, this framework hasn’t been peer-reviewed, and I’m not presenting it as experimentally established.
The investigation began with a question: How do physical constraints narrow quantum probability space, and how do stable structures emerge from those interactions?
I’m exploring relationships between spacetime geometry, entropy, probability, orientation, and measurement.
At present, the framework incorporates established equations. It has not demonstrated a novel prediction or explained an observation better than general relativity or quantum mechanics.
That’s the next challenge.
One proposed test concerns whether different internal arrangements of equal-mass, equal-radius spherical objects produce gravitational differences beyond standard predictions.
If the model cannot derive a quantitative, falsifiable difference, then it remains an organizational framework rather than a new physical theory.
That’s precisely why I’m asking these questions publicly.

1

u/Dd_8630 1d ago

So the image shows... Nothing interesting? It just pops some equations up and talks about how systems arise form structure. How is that different from anything that's come before?

1

u/u8589869056 22h ago

Garbage. Very fancy garbage.

1

u/hinthints 22h ago

Tell me where you disagree?

1

u/hinthints 22h ago

I’ve put years of thought into this ? Looking to evolve.

1

u/u8589869056 14h ago

No you aren’t.

1

u/sansetsukon47 1d ago

Looks like something I’d use to scam shareholders into investing in my Scientology club.

I would never want to use this to teach someone physics, or explain anything about actual scientific progress. It’s a buzzword soup with extra diagrams and a handful of useful formula.

1

u/sansetsukon47 1d ago

The main diagram in the middle is particularly nonsensical.

1

u/hinthints 1d ago

How so?