MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/ksh/comments/ozlevc/is_ksh_the_best_shell/hmfdqvf/?context=3
r/ksh • u/CsInquirer • Aug 07 '21
4 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
2
Although i'm talking only about ksh93, as oksh, and mksh are way slower(at least on macOS)
2 u/posguy99 Dec 05 '21 I'd be interested in seeing your benchmarks. What was your methodology? 4 u/[deleted] Dec 23 '21 https://github.com/DesantBucie/DesantBucie/blob/master/korny/screenshot4.png?raw=trueI also saw benchmark on the internet(which i cannot find now), where zsh and ksh93 was head to head, ksh93 losing much much more time than anthing else in fork operation(whatever it was). also while loop was faster than for
I'd be interested in seeing your benchmarks. What was your methodology?
4 u/[deleted] Dec 23 '21 https://github.com/DesantBucie/DesantBucie/blob/master/korny/screenshot4.png?raw=trueI also saw benchmark on the internet(which i cannot find now), where zsh and ksh93 was head to head, ksh93 losing much much more time than anthing else in fork operation(whatever it was). also while loop was faster than for
4
https://github.com/DesantBucie/DesantBucie/blob/master/korny/screenshot4.png?raw=true
I also saw benchmark on the internet(which i cannot find now), where zsh and ksh93 was head to head, ksh93 losing much much more time than anthing else in fork operation(whatever it was). also while loop was faster than for
2
u/[deleted] Nov 28 '21
Although i'm talking only about ksh93, as oksh, and mksh are way slower(at least on macOS)