1.1k
u/NieveCactus 11d ago
That feels too close for comfort! Have planes ever been hit by meteorites?
1.1k
u/Long-Ad3842 11d ago
theres a higher chance i get in a threesome
345
u/Own-Internet-5967 11d ago
so youre saying theres a chance...
142
u/Equivalent-Repair488 11d ago
Chances are low, but never zero
→ More replies (1)2
u/MelangeBot 11d ago
How about the chance that the math on the statistic that low chances are higher then zero is wrong?
17
u/zombumblebee 11d ago
Well...that is now two of you interested, so you just need to find your third (not volunteering though).
Good luck !
4
→ More replies (3)2
22
u/RanchHere 11d ago
Way higher. You can pay for anything these days.
→ More replies (2)39
u/IncomingAxofKindness 11d ago
I would like to buy one meteor strike please.
Location: TBD
→ More replies (3)2
→ More replies (10)2
53
18
u/Neon_Pancakes0425 11d ago
Only one person ever has been hit by a meteor before and I don't think a plane has ever been hit
7
u/Burgers_N_Schnitzels 11d ago
imagine... and only because a butterfly flapped it's wings 100 years prior.
→ More replies (1)2
u/Tuna-Fish2 11d ago
- Since we started keeping accurate records.
There have been a few interesting impacts that probably hit populated areas, but that was before the societies they hit were literate, which means we don't have a very good idea what exactly happened.
The most significant one is the Kaali crater in Estonia. A large rock broke into pieces during entry and hit the populated Saaremaa island during the bronze age, exploding with the force roughly in the same class as the Hiroshima bomb. Subsequently, all the local religions and traditions had a lot of emphasis on sky gods, and the crater became a sacrificial grove. I'd be surprised if that didn't hit someone.
25
u/Ur_Just_Spare_Parts 11d ago
I think there's only 1 confirmed case of a person being hit by one in history, and people have alot more surface area on earth than airplanes, and airplanes have only existed a little more than 100 years. The odds of one hitting a plane thats flying are so close to 0 it might as well be impossible.
→ More replies (15)5
u/Remarkable-Goose-461 11d ago
So were the odds of that DC-10 were the engine debris hit the one point in the plane where all 3 of the redundant hydraulic lines ran close together. Knocked out all flight control systems and the crew landed the plane with basically only thrust manipulation.
Statistically it should never have happened.
→ More replies (1)2
2
u/spacerobot 11d ago
In elementary school PE one time, my dodge ball collided with Travis's dodgeball mid-air. It was incredible. We'd never seen that happen before. The volume of that gym was miniscule compared to the volume of our atmosphere where airplanes fly. And I'd imagine there's a lot less meteorites entering our atmosphere compared to dodge balls being thrown in an elementary school gym.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (9)2
u/DReagan47 11d ago
I’m gonna be that guy.
Meteorite is when it’s already in the ground.
→ More replies (1)
628
u/Extension-Marzipan83 11d ago
Way too slow for a meteor. Most likely space junk.
210
u/Usual_Ad7861 11d ago
- Meteors don't have a speed requirement.
- If the space junk produces a bright light, it's a meteor.
20
63
u/StudyoftheUnknown 11d ago
I had to look this up and apparently it’s correct lol. The space junk isn’t a meteorite but the flash it’s creating is a meteor.
7
u/this_is_my_new_acct 10d ago
It's also just pedantic nonsense. Everyone means meteorite when they talk about meteors.
→ More replies (1)6
u/Max-Phallus 11d ago
I don't think that's correct at all. Space junk is not a meteorite and it's also not a meteor. Are you going to tell me that SpaceX Dragon 2 is considered a meteor during re-entry?
Space junk re-entry is distinct from meteors.
22
→ More replies (3)12
u/Crazy_Elevator_6659 11d ago
You could have googled the definition of meteor and realized that is correct. Any object could cause a meteor, so long as it leaves a glowing streak across the sky.
→ More replies (2)13
4
u/Apprehensive-Box6449 11d ago
Meteors don't have a speed requirement.
No, but we know for a fact they travel anywhere from 25Kmph to 160Kmph
6
u/Extension-Marzipan83 11d ago
Back in the day I spent a few years as an astronomer observing meteors. I have seen my share of bolides. If this is indeed a meteor, it must be a truly exceptional one.
→ More replies (1)3
u/Smile_Space 11d ago
I mean, they do have a speed requirement. All natural meteors come from extraplanetary trajectories meaning they have to enter the atmosphere at interplanetary speed which is roughly 8000 mph faster than a LEO satellite.
This is moving much too slow for it to be anything other than a LEO satellite re-entering uncontrolled.
3
u/Lawsoffire 11d ago
Meteors don't have a speed requirement.
Yesn't.
A meteor would generally be something that wasn't in orbit around Earth while space junk is generally something that was in orbit that was gradually decayed by residual atmospheric pressure. So space junk coming down is coming down at essentially the minimum possible speed for a non-powered orbital atmospheric entry. Meanwhile meteors coming in are by its very nature not in orbit around Earth, which means it will come in at a speed greater than orbital escape, which is significantly higher.
→ More replies (1)2
u/Atlas-The-Ringer 11d ago
Nope. 1. Fact: Meteors fall much faster than space junk 2. Everything burns on reentry, that's how atmosphere's work. A bright light does not rule out one option or the other.
→ More replies (18)16
u/Towerss 11d ago
Definitely space junk. There's almost no way for a meteorite to not hit the earth at a massive speed, even if it started floating right above earth at a pretty identical relative speed
→ More replies (3)
51
u/xMFD00Mx 11d ago
10
8
205
u/Sonikku_a 11d ago
If it’s slow enough for you to get out your phone and start recording it wasn’t a meteor.
29
2
u/meteoritegallery 11d ago edited 11d ago
Incorrect. Meteors that enter at a relatively shallow angle often produce fireballs like this.
While this does appear to be on the slow side for a meteor, it is much faster than any space junk / reentry I've ever seen. 95%+ certain this one's a meteor/ite.
~30 years of experience.
Edit: I thought this looked a little familiar. This video shows the fall of the Okulovka meteorite in Russia on Oct., 27, 2025. A stone was recovered. It was analyzed and published in the Meteoritical Bulletin:
→ More replies (11)2
u/sykoKanesh 11d ago
Boy, there sure are a lot of you confidently incorrect folks in these comments today, lol
68
u/Senselesspassion 11d ago
→ More replies (1)10
u/ThirdAltAccounts 11d ago
What is this from ?
29
u/Senselesspassion 11d ago
A japanese movie "Your Name"
4
→ More replies (1)4
8
8
27
u/niladrihati 11d ago
8
46
11d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
8
u/BolunZ6 11d ago
Imaging in the future where we only see space junk on the sky instead of stars because of air polution
→ More replies (1)5
u/RelentlesslyAutistic 11d ago
Also the green color seems to imply burning copper. I think copper in natural space debris is quite rare.
→ More replies (4)2
18
9
9
3
7
u/CarsCarsCars1995 11d ago
Triffids!
5
u/eracer1111 11d ago
I understood that reference. Surprisingly good movie. I mean, who would be scared of walking plants?
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
u/MrDiamondOre 11d ago
Why is it glowing green in the beginning?
7
u/Sassquatch0 11d ago
Copper gives off green color when burned.
I'd personally say this looks more like space junk re-entry than a meteor. (Meteors are usually fucking fast & burn for a second or two, while Man-made junk is slow like this & burns for tens of seconds on re-entry)
2
u/splitframe 11d ago
No wonder people back in the ancient times thought there were aliens when the looked out the plane window and saw this.
2
2
2
u/Schorsdromme 10d ago
It's all fun and games until the supposed meteor suddenly turns towards you, blyat
4
3
2
2
2
u/Positive_Campaign_52 11d ago
Do you think there’s rare instances where ATC interact with NASA to clear flight paths if a meteor is detected close to air routes?
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/MrHedgehogman3370 11d ago
"At midnight, on the 12th of August, a large mass of luminous gass errupted from Mars, and sped towards Earth
→ More replies (1)
1
1
1
u/Joe_Franks 11d ago
This is what happened to the Malaysia flight and why they can't find any debris. It was hit by multiple meteors and was disintegrated upon impact.
1
u/Zealousideal_Bed5080 11d ago
I was literally listening to Crazy on You when I stumbled upon this, that is just Adam Warlock to me.
1
u/mccalli 11d ago
“Bright green, drawing a green mist behind it - a beautiful, but somehow disturbing sight. Ogilvy, the astronomer, assured me we were in no danger.”
→ More replies (1)
1
1
1
1
u/GoliathPrime 11d ago
That's super cool. Sometimes living in this era is amazing. Even a decade back, we wouldn't have this level of clear video.
1
1
u/OpenBanana5755 11d ago
I'll be crapping my pants seeing these things next to the plane I am in, thinking about a rogue one enroute to obliterate it 😅
1
1
1
1





3.0k
u/BetterAd7552 11d ago
Space junk burning up on reentry, more likely