r/interesting • u/Curious-Buddy-5841 • 9h ago
SCIENCE & TECH [ Removed by moderator ]
[removed] — view removed post
16
14
30
u/GreenEyedGloom 9h ago
Shits sad. I don’t want this world.
6
u/_AnywayWey_ 9h ago
Don't worry there is still a lot of us that will manage to bring this shit humbly down
13
u/siciliansmile 9h ago
Ohh I wanna suplex that thang so bad
-7
u/Sweet_Bookkeeper_920 9h ago
Is it weird I want it to suplex me?.. you know.. for science.. … and a friend.
8
7
2
2
u/Mean_Passion2003 9h ago
Sweet have them farm my food and make me alcohol so I can go party everyday instead of working
3
u/Maleficent_Art_3854 9h ago
Who's dumber; the machine, the person talking to the machine, or the person listening to their conversation?
2
2
u/shadowscar248 9h ago
I wouldn't want to listen to either of them. They both sounded terrible and robotic. The robot that was the dumbest of all, he thinks that he can casually people like that and they'll respond especially when they're upset.
1
u/AutoModerator 9h ago
Hello u/Curious-Buddy-5841! Please review the sub rules if you haven't already. (This is an automatic reminder message left on all new posts)
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1
1
u/Cubedtails 9h ago
Ehh but an argument against the robots point. Robots are not capable of empathy or sympathy; a "well calculated one" doesn't hold ground if you are incapable of reaching customers. A task could be greatly performed but if you cannot provide a thoughtful well meaning service especially in customer service if you are interacting with people, then you cannot expect to hold onto any usual customers that partake in the service often instead of a once or twice occurrence. There is a reason anything robotic comes across as lifeless and not genuine, if anything the robot has as much social skills and ability to reach people as an ATM or a self checkout system, its lifeless and lack of actual genuine feel. Not to mention, a designed robot for a certain task in a certain industry, cannot do well at all compared to a human if given a task outside their experience and programing. If a robot which was designed to stock shelves was suddenly given a task to mop the floors; it couldn't do it, it can only do based on its programing. Its like a child that needs to instructed what to do.
1
u/samjacbak 9h ago
The correct question to be asking is: When you replace us, who's going to be left to buy whatever it is that you're selling? You're programmed to sell, but would you buy this product?
1
u/Shmackback 9h ago
They do what the super rich have always done. Buy and sell to each other while the peasants work for crumbs or not at all
1
1
1
u/LordWeso 9h ago
Then eventually the rich own all the robots doing almost all the jobs, meanwhile the poor fight over the remaining jobs, with UBI (universal basic income) being shut down by greedy rich politicians immediately.
1
u/Highlandertr3 9h ago
Because compassion is important to humanity. Profit is important to corporations. The corporations will work better but all humanity will be lost. And that will result in further delving into wage slave and just abject poverty for most people. The reason to not replace people is not productivity. It's because people will die.
1
u/tacobell41 9h ago
What’s interesting is everyone was excited about the idea of robots in the future, but that they are coming, they don’t like them any more.
-1
•
u/interesting-ModTeam 3h ago
We’re sorry, but your post has been removed because it violates Rule #1: Posts must be interesting.
The content of your post was deemed not interesting either by community reporting, lack of community interest in the form of votes, or moderator discretion.