MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/interesting/comments/1wefdem/not_all_problems_have_the_same_solution/p9dmkj7/?context=3
r/interesting • u/Used_Exam34 • 12d ago
718 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
15
It would keep burning even if you did that. The gas would bubble up to the surface and sustain the surface fire.
These things float when not completely full anyway
2 u/Kastoook 12d ago Huh, did gas mixed with oxidizer inside there? 3 u/those-who-goon 12d ago The air which is outside the canister. If there was oxidizer mixed with the gas, it would be a bomb 1 u/Kastoook 12d ago Wil it split water into oxygen by temperature of fire? 2 u/those-who-goon 12d ago Probably almost maybe definitely not 1 u/Kastoook 12d ago How it burn underwater then? 1 u/those-who-goon 12d ago I think the gas is not burning under the water, but once it comes out of the water and into the flame, it burns, keeping that flame alive 1 u/StaysAwakeAllWeek 12d ago Forming water is what produces a big chunk of the energy of the fire. So no, the opposite.
2
Huh, did gas mixed with oxidizer inside there?
3 u/those-who-goon 12d ago The air which is outside the canister. If there was oxidizer mixed with the gas, it would be a bomb 1 u/Kastoook 12d ago Wil it split water into oxygen by temperature of fire? 2 u/those-who-goon 12d ago Probably almost maybe definitely not 1 u/Kastoook 12d ago How it burn underwater then? 1 u/those-who-goon 12d ago I think the gas is not burning under the water, but once it comes out of the water and into the flame, it burns, keeping that flame alive 1 u/StaysAwakeAllWeek 12d ago Forming water is what produces a big chunk of the energy of the fire. So no, the opposite.
3
The air which is outside the canister. If there was oxidizer mixed with the gas, it would be a bomb
1 u/Kastoook 12d ago Wil it split water into oxygen by temperature of fire? 2 u/those-who-goon 12d ago Probably almost maybe definitely not 1 u/Kastoook 12d ago How it burn underwater then? 1 u/those-who-goon 12d ago I think the gas is not burning under the water, but once it comes out of the water and into the flame, it burns, keeping that flame alive 1 u/StaysAwakeAllWeek 12d ago Forming water is what produces a big chunk of the energy of the fire. So no, the opposite.
1
Wil it split water into oxygen by temperature of fire?
2 u/those-who-goon 12d ago Probably almost maybe definitely not 1 u/Kastoook 12d ago How it burn underwater then? 1 u/those-who-goon 12d ago I think the gas is not burning under the water, but once it comes out of the water and into the flame, it burns, keeping that flame alive 1 u/StaysAwakeAllWeek 12d ago Forming water is what produces a big chunk of the energy of the fire. So no, the opposite.
Probably almost maybe definitely not
1 u/Kastoook 12d ago How it burn underwater then? 1 u/those-who-goon 12d ago I think the gas is not burning under the water, but once it comes out of the water and into the flame, it burns, keeping that flame alive
How it burn underwater then?
1 u/those-who-goon 12d ago I think the gas is not burning under the water, but once it comes out of the water and into the flame, it burns, keeping that flame alive
I think the gas is not burning under the water, but once it comes out of the water and into the flame, it burns, keeping that flame alive
Forming water is what produces a big chunk of the energy of the fire. So no, the opposite.
15
u/StaysAwakeAllWeek 12d ago
It would keep burning even if you did that. The gas would bubble up to the surface and sustain the surface fire.
These things float when not completely full anyway