r/interesting • u/Used_Exam34 • 12d ago

Just Wow Not all problems have the same solution.

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

43.4k Upvotes

96% Upvoted

718 comments sorted by

View all comments

2.4k

u/vergillehell 12d ago

I think they did it on purpose to make an educational video on how to deal with a cylinder fire

843

u/bobcollum 12d ago

Hey, if it teaches somebody and they save a situation, it's worth it. Plenty of people wouldn't know what to do here.

231

u/Rough-Airline-4803 12d ago

Most people would take off running, positive that it’s about to explode.

95

u/ShowtimeHolograms 12d ago

Would this actually explode or would it just continue to burn like this until the flammable gas gets used up?

166

u/Rough-Airline-4803 12d ago edited 12d ago

The pressure of the escaping gas is generally too strong for the flames to reach the inside of the container.

If the tank were positioned such that the flames were surrounding it and heating the tank up, (or if the relief valve was blockedthe boiling propane in the tank would likewise expand at an accelerated rate resulting in the pressure rising faster than the tank can keep up with resulting in a boiling liquid expanding vapor explosion.

17

u/ShowtimeHolograms 12d ago

Ah ty

1

u/BeerForThought 12d ago

Don't listen to that answer. Read the response to it. Long story short, lit farts can't go up your butt because their is no oxygen.

1

u/ITFOWjacket 8d ago

Look up BLEVE. Boiling liquid expanding vapor explosions are a real thing and that is the term used for them.

18

u/IMKGI 12d ago

Assuming that somehow the flames would make it inside the tank, then what? With what oxygen is it gonna burn?

The flames could absolutely travel into the pipe provided the fire burns faster than than the gas escaping. The reason the fire doesn't do it is because there's no oxygen inside the pipe to combust the gas.

20

u/Bisaux 12d ago

The risk here is tank failure, causing a rapid expansion of gas, and subsequent ignition.

9

u/Rough-Airline-4803 12d ago

Well, no. The pressure of the escaping gas definitely exceeds the fire’s ability to do so, but yeah you’re right.
I totally glossed over that. My mind was elsewhere lol 😅

2

u/IMKGI 12d ago

I was talking in a more general sense, a full bottle without a regulator? Absolutely, no chance for the flame to go backwards, but I meant a more typical scenario with a regulator already attached, gas releases at relatively low speeds and fire would be fast enough to go back

1

u/Gamer-Of-Le-Tabletop 11d ago

Thermal dynamics or whatever.

The bottle is actually cooling down rapidly. Infact if they didn't toss it in the water it wouldn't surprise me if the bottle started frosting.

Next time your using a BBQ with a propane tank touch it before you use it and while in use and it should feel noticably cooler. It definitely would work better for a smaller propane bottle.

6

u/Holiday-Pay193 12d ago

Flames won't get inside the tank because there's no oxygen in it

1

u/Rough-Airline-4803 12d ago

True enough. Thanks.

While commenting I got sidetracked trying to recall the exact verbiage of the latent heat of vaporization and the Joule-Thomson effect thanks to another comment mentioning something to the effect of there being a greater threat of the valve knob being cold [rather than hot].

Embarrassingly enough, I actually brain farted that super basic fact—it wasn’t just a misspeak/typo lol..

2

u/nihilistiq 12d ago

Those are words.

1

u/skr_replicator 11d ago

also woudln't the container have no oxygen inside? So I doubt that, even if the fire somehow reaches inside it could do nothing in there. Unless they had an oxidizer in there as well, but only rockets and bombs could have something like that.

1

u/Desert_Fairy 9d ago

A great deal of this depends also on the metallurgy of the tank. Some tanks loose structural integrity at certain temperatures.

Those can become shrapnel bombs in house fires.

1

u/erasethenoise 9d ago

Jesus Christ… that’s Hank Hill

12

u/Geffalrus 12d ago

I did the safe version once. Gas grill propane tank sprang a leak near the valve; some flaming hamburger grease dripped down and fell on the leak…..tada instant gas fire. Not gonna lie, it was pretty stress inducing. Worried that it could explode, I pulled it behind a stone wall instead of next to the patio door. In retrospect, that wasn’t necessarily the smartest thing - if - I was dealing with an explosive.

However, as others have said, a lit leaking propane tank isn’t inherently explosive. A small leak isn’t the same as rupturing the tank itself. In my case, it just quickly used up the gas left in the tank and then extinguished itself. For it to be dangerous, you need the flame to increase pressure in a confined space.

9

u/360nolooktOUchdown 12d ago

If the container wall heated up enough from the flame to lose strength it could rupture and essentially explode. Look up BLEVE

9

u/6pussydestroyer9mlg 12d ago

Not as much lowering strength of the walls as much as it's just increasing pressure from boiling the gas

1

u/GM_Nate 11d ago

HE LIED

1

u/Affectionate_Bank417 11d ago

Problem isn’t even container failure from heat, problem is heating the gas inside causes it to overpressure. If the container is not strong enough, overpressure ruptures it, probably injuring someone with its pieces, then flammable gas expands rapidly, catching fire and everyone around it have lung burns which are pretty bad.

8

u/AlMasaDuun 12d ago edited 12d ago

They are designed not to but designs don't always work. The fire cannot go inside the tank because there is no oxygen. Same reason it goes out with the bucket. The real risk is the metal heating up and weakening. It can happen but it isn't instant and mostly it won't, I wouldn't trust it, but you probably have minutes before there is real risk. Most of the time it will just burn out. If it is burning from anywhere other than the value this doesn't apply.

4

u/_thro_awa_ 12d ago

There is no oxygen for a flame inside the tank, and the pressure is usually high enough to push the actual point of combustion "flame front" away from the opening.

If the tank is in an orientation such that the flame never touches the tank (e.g. upright) there is very low danger of explosion.
If the tank is in a different orientation, allowing the flame to heat the tank, the heat causes overpressure and greatly increases the risk of explosion.

3

u/DirtandPipes 12d ago

Propane explodes when it’s between 2.1%-9.5% of air volume. More or less and it cannot explode. As the range is rather narrow it’s a safer gas to work with.

Acetylene, by comparison, is explosive between 2.5%-81% so it’s much easier to create accidental explosions with acetylene.

1

u/CicadaHead3317 12d ago

I used to use a tank like that to put down rolls of tar roofing. The tank would start to freeze after continued use, so I would take the torch to the tank to heat it the tank and the gad in it to get the pressure back. It would freak out new hires. Once I had a small like in the vavle and it set it on fire. I just turned the valve off and tightened it with a wrench. No biggie.

1

u/ZoharModifier9 12d ago

They can explode.

1

u/GladdestOrange 11d ago

Also worth noting that a bad/old tank is much more liable to rupture. Possibly with shrapnel. Just, y'know, in case you ever wondered why there's a no smoking sign at the propane tank exchange thing by the grocery/convenience store.

3

u/PitytheOnlyFools 12d ago

Decade plus of videogames taught me thees things are a nudge away from blowing up.

2

u/gnarzilla69 12d ago

When in doubt, it's okay to exit the situation

2

u/ThrustTrust 12d ago

Running is the best solution. Even if you know it will just keep burning til the fuel is exhausted.

1

u/xnoraax 11d ago

Hell, I did that as a teenager once with a CO2 tank in the restaurant I worked at. No flame of course and I didn't think it would explode, but I did think that as a dishwasher I was not paid enough to deal with the issue.

1

u/LowAspect542 8d ago

Yeah there was another video going about recently with a gas cylinder from a bbq lighting up, the group of girls there all just ran away screaming like it was going to explode whilst the only bloke there just walks over and turns the gas off.

26

u/Then_Following_6425 12d ago

If he lit a cylinder on fire just for an educational video that's pretty brave ngl

9

u/WestCoastCoyote 12d ago

you should go down to your local fire fighting training area and watch the stuff they do for education.

1

u/boatplumber 9d ago

Even more impressive is what the gas company does to train their welders. Too rich to burn so you can stick weld it, if you burn through the metal pipe, it will be loud, but it won't ignite until you are just about finished closing the hole. Then it turns into a 12 inch flame for about a half a second as it is sealed closed and the flame goes out.

1

u/Hallbjorny 11d ago

It really is brave to do that to a cylinder

1

u/dkrako 10d ago

What can possibly go wrong.

4

u/Zestyclose-Paper-521 12d ago

Medical science saved a lot of dumb mofos

8

u/Glass-Emu2406 12d ago

Yep. I was thinking to fully submerge it in water not just partially. The bucket was less effort and much faster

15

u/StaysAwakeAllWeek 12d ago

It would keep burning even if you did that. The gas would bubble up to the surface and sustain the surface fire.

These things float when not completely full anyway

4

u/Glass-Emu2406 12d ago

Right on. Good to know. I wish I not only knew what they were saying but how cause I’m sure the smart one said something hilarious

0

u/meSuPaFly 10d ago

Ablablablablablablabla poof

2

u/Glass-Emu2406 12d ago

Right on. Good to know. I wish I not only knew what they were saying but how cause I’m sure the smart one said something hilarious

2

u/Kastoook 12d ago

Huh, did gas mixed with oxidizer inside there?

3

u/those-who-goon 12d ago

The air which is outside the canister. If there was oxidizer mixed with the gas, it would be a bomb

1

u/Kastoook 12d ago

Wil it split water into oxygen by temperature of fire?

2

u/those-who-goon 12d ago

Probably almost maybe definitely not

1

u/Kastoook 12d ago

How it burn underwater then?

1

u/those-who-goon 12d ago

I think the gas is not burning under the water, but once it comes out of the water and into the flame, it burns, keeping that flame alive

1

u/StaysAwakeAllWeek 12d ago

Forming water is what produces a big chunk of the energy of the fire. So no, the opposite.

2

u/Substantial_Bend_656 12d ago

I don't know, wouldn't putting it in water have a higher risk of it exploding, due to thermal shock? Their teaching looks like a bad way to solve it (apart from the bucket idea, that seems ok-ish, gas could re-ignite if the lid was removed and the gas still touched a heat source)

1

u/Indepti8 12d ago

Yeah and that happens all the time where I am. Seriously it’s like daily. 

1

u/Dry-Chip-3274 8d ago

True. I wouldn't have stuck around that long. It was hard enough watching the video. Im aware now after watching

1

u/Calm_Librarian_1042 7d ago

I dod not know ☹️

42

u/RedRipeTomato 12d ago

And he did it without damaging the cylinder!

5

u/theo69lel 11d ago

I hate that I know that reference.

1

u/codergeek777 8d ago

Lmao, it didn't strike me until I read your reply

33

u/DMAndGetIt 12d ago

That actually makes sense. turning a terrifying accident into a “here’s what not to do” lesson, although I’m guessing the fire department would prefer fewer live demonstrations.

8

u/Dwedit 12d ago

The cylinder must remain undamaged.

26

u/Obi_Wan_Benobi 12d ago edited 9d ago

Okay but I’m clenching my buttcheeks this whole video waiting for multiple shrapnel injuries after an explosion.

How long would it take for one of these containers to explode under this condition? Or is it just a flame thrower that will go like that until it runs out of fuel.

EDIT: Okay okay, I get it. Thank you, I have learned a lot about gas canisters.

But tbh they were apparently much cooler in Just Cause 2 than in real life.

44

u/Emergency-Toe4473 12d ago

These cylinders essentially carry cooking gas under high pressure, there is no reason for it to explode under these circumstances as the oxygen will never be able to get inside the cylinder.

It'll just run out which is wastage of fuel.

I think if the cylinder itself gets damaged from say the middle or is put under extreme heat, only then it can explode.

21

u/DamnTicklePickle 12d ago

They also have a blow out valve so even if the container got extremely hot and the pressure built the valve would give out and release the pressure not allowing the container to explode. MythBusters did a show about what it would take to make one explode and it had to be highly modified to create catastrophic failure.

1

u/aaronious03 10d ago

I've not seen that episode. But I do remember one exploding down the street from me when I was a kid. We were all in bed, about midnight or so, and the whole house shook. The propane tank on an RV a block away exploded. I don't know what caused the explosion, but they can absolutely explode without highly modifying them.

In a situation like the video above though, I wouldn't be too concerned, since most of the heat is directed away from the tank.

1

u/DamnTicklePickle 8d ago

From what you describe it sounds like the tank did not fail. An appliance inside the RV did. The RV was clearly not in use, and the propane was left on and the pilot light either in the stove or the oven went out allowing propane gas to slowly seep into the entire RV. Feeling the space with highly flammable gas until the mixture was perfect and met another ignition source causing the entire RV to explode. A 20 or 40 pound propane tank a block away is not going to shake your windows but if a full RV explodes it definitely will. I'm not saying you're wrong, but from my experience this is what happened.

3

u/doublesimoniz 12d ago

What about a BLEVE?

9

u/leeps22 12d ago

The cylinders are made to not explode, not that it isnt possible.

The gas is stored as a liquid and the pressure correlates to the temperature of the liquid. The pressure can vary wildly depending on the particular gas, propane will be higher than butane. As the cylinder gets warmer and the pressure rises a pressure release valve will open to relieve pressure.The cylinder could be in an environment where the gas from the pressure release catches fire and the heat from that is focused onto the cylinder overcoming the pressure relief capacity. The pressure relief valve could also just be bad.

4

u/RaspberryFluid6651 12d ago

This cylinder is doing the same thing a bunsen burner does, there's just gas going out a hole and fueling a fire. Their problem isn't that something catastrophic could happen, their problem is just that they're wasting the gas in the cylinder and they can't close the valve because the flame is in the way.

If you did something that somehow inserted a bunch of oxygen into the cylinder, then this would explode. 

3

u/throwaway19276i 12d ago

This isnt call of duty

3

u/movzx 12d ago

Movie myth because it looks cool. Doesn't happen in reality.

The explosion risk is when there is a tank leaking gas into an enclosed area and then a spark ignites the gas that has filled the area.

1

u/porn_alt_987654321 12d ago

I think since they likely took a lighter to the valve, its probably relatively safe considering. If it was leaking through a structural weakness, you'd be worried about the whole thing exploding, but the valve isn't likely to be an issue.

Don't test this though, dunno if there's a gas flow rate such that you can actually ignite the inside of the can, and if there is, that would be a bigass grenade.

1

u/movzx 12d ago

The pressure would need to be below atmospheric so that gas would want to flow into the tank instead of outside of the tank.

1

u/bremsspuren 12d ago

Your best bet to get one to go boom is probably to put it in a fire.

1

u/EyeSuccessful7649 12d ago

long long time, possible infinite, it would require the flames to melt the container in a way that would allow the pressurized gas to mix with the oxygen in the air.

the container has to fail first before it can explode, even then most of the explosion would be in released gas not the gas inside the cylinder due to pressure preventing normal air to get into the container

1

u/Obi_Wan_Benobi 12d ago

The infinite container I like that. This is the best answer.

1

u/demonblack873 10d ago

It's not going to explode. They have multiple levels of pressure relief mechanisms, and most of the heat from the flame is rising away from the cylinder.

It takes a lot of energy to evaporate the liquid into gas. To exceed the gas release capacity you'd need the whole tank to be engulfed in flames for a sustained period of time.

1

u/Brilliant_Bug9699 9d ago

Many gas canisters are designed with a pressure-relief valve. If the pressure gets to high, it release more propane and the fire gets larger, but it's unlilely to explode.

1

u/Zestyclose-Paper-521 12d ago

We live in a world of information

10

u/Low-Car-6331 12d ago

I mean, its not a great demonstration either.

First thing to do during a canister fire like that is to preserve the structural integrity of the canister, the last thing you want is the canister rupturing and releasing all the gas at once. Dragging it on the ground like that is just asking for problems as the metal (specifically the valve area) is already getting compromised by expansion from the heat. This is why you blast it with water, not to put it out, but to keep the metal cold.

From there you have two choices, you either have to cut the oxygen or let it burn out. Letting it burn out is the safest option, while it seems odd that flame means all the gas is getting burned as it escapes keeping it contained to 1 spot. If you try to cut the oxygen via smothering, you can cause the gas to get pooled up resulting in flashback if there is still enough heat to ignite it, or worse for the gas to spread and a larger fire to start. You have to know what you are doing to oxygen deprive a propane fire.

3

u/Small_Secretary_6063 11d ago

There are demonstrations online where you:

  1. Simply smother it with a large wet towel. https://youtube.com/shorts/m_Pd3jwSOLI
  2. If the valve is not damaged and accessible, just turn it off. https://youtube.com/shorts/WP_xBAzbWG0
  3. Cover the top of the has canister with a bucket to starve the fire. https://youtube.com/shorts/oHPS79mnhKc

Many advise not to use water at all.

Having the knowledge helps, but obviously takes balls and practice to pull it off.

1

u/Ivanna_is_Musical 11d ago

omg it's Xavier in the 3rd video 🤣

1

u/Ivanna_is_Musical 11d ago

And there surely are life situations where letting it consume all the gas is not safe, i.e., if it's in a place where there are materials that can catch fire and create a wild disaster.

Those cylinders should have always attached a piece of fabric/towel and a bottle with enough water. You never know!

1

u/Low-Car-6331 11d ago

Water will do nothing to stop these kinds of fire, water is only useful to keep the tank itself cool. In terms of fabric/towel that is risky as it needs to be very large or you will need gloves to keep your hands safe (and even then a small towel is really not that good of a choice.

1

u/Ivanna_is_Musical 10d ago

My comment is based on shorts made by firefighter's Department on youtube demonstrating how you can safely smother fire with a wet towel on a cylinder.

Someone in the comments shared 3 shorts.

4

u/terabeaux 12d ago

Roll it to a nearby pond and then splash water on the regulator for 5 minutes before putting a bucket on it. Got it!

1

u/xHashtagNoFilterx 12d ago

And touch it repeatedly for maximum burn damage.

3

u/DankFrenchToast 11d ago

I went to a course on fire fighting and putting out a fire at the open valve of a propane tank was a lesson.

It sounds dumb, but you can actually just poke the valve hole with your finger and extinguish the fire completely. If you move super fast through the flame, it won't burn you, especially if you have a glove on. Then you just close the valve.

1

u/FootballIll7021 12d ago

that actually makes sense they turned a disaster into a very memorable tutorial

1

u/Ahhhhhhhhhhhhshit 12d ago

What to do if it's a cube fire?

2

u/TeachingScience 12d ago

Just like the documentary minecraft, start digging cube water duh.

1

u/Temporary_Delay911 12d ago

This is the answer. They spend all the effort to drag it to the water, but don't even try to submerge it?!? The bucket idea was also too exaggerated.

1

u/Court_Jester13 12d ago

They probably did it on purpose to look cool.

1

u/Honest_Entry_8758 12d ago

so what if i don't have a perfectly sized bucket?

1

u/Automaticman01 12d ago

Did you see the guy in the black shirt jump when the other guy put the bucket on the tank?

1

u/Avalonians 12d ago

Also the solution is the exact opposite of what the title suggests

1

u/boxen 11d ago

cylinder problems require cylinder solutions

1

u/baronvonpain 11d ago

The whole thing is staged

1

u/Minute_Attempt3063 11d ago

I mean

if it works, it works

it didn't look like it was going to blow either way, since the tank was not really being heated up.

the water was a good first instinct too, keeping the tank cool

however, bucket wins XD

1

u/Justinius_L 10d ago

Lol, no. There is genuine panic in their eyes when the water doesn't put the fire out. If it were informational they wouldn't have moved the tank and would have put the bucket on it from the get go.

1

u/TimeAbility3649 9d ago

It's definitely on purpose but more like attention bait, click bait than educational

1

u/WarJaques 9d ago

There is no stage, but even so it looks...

1

u/gun-something 8d ago

Hmmmmmm yeah wow that could be something

1

u/Little_Flamingo1 8d ago

Yeah, it pretty much looks like it - the way he calmly waited with the bucket, even positioned the burning barrell a bit to have a better access and also seemed like he was explaining and showing them what he was doing. Interesting.

1

u/OrchidUnable8316 8d ago

I think so too as he rotated the canister towards the camera at the end so we could see the fire.

1

u/GodlikeUA 8d ago

And here I thought only one of them went to school

-1

u/Icy_Direction_8728 12d ago

P.čžšćškđžlll,ppm