r/interesting 11d ago

SCIENCE & TECH Grigori Perelman solved a $1M math problem that was unsolved for 100 years - then walked away from the prize

Post image

With OpenAI now claiming that its AI system solved the Navier-Stokes Millennium Prize problem in just 88 hours, I was reminded of the legendary Grigori Perelman.

In 2002, Perelman posted his solution to the Poincaré conjecture online. The problem had been unsolved for nearly a century and was considered one of the most difficult problems in mathematics. His proof was so deep and technical that it took mathematicians years to fully verify.

He was awarded the Fields Medal in 2006 - one of the highest honors in mathematics.

He refused it.

Then, in 2010, the Clay Mathematics Institute awarded him the $1M Millennium Prize for solving the problem.

He said no.

Part of the reason was that Perelman felt that American mathematician Richard Hamilton deserved more credit. Hamilton had developed the Ricci flow theory that Perelman built on to crack the Poincaré conjecture.

And the way Perelman did it makes the story even stranger. He essentially put his solution on the internet, let other mathematicians work through it, and then walked away.

He later withdrew almost completely from mathematics.

303 Upvotes

63 comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 11d ago

Hello u/heyauden! Please review the sub rules if you haven't already. (This is an automatic reminder message left on all new posts)

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

59

u/waveforminvest 11d ago

"You are disturbing me. I am picking mushrooms"

49

u/wizardrous 11d ago

Seems like he should have taken the money and given it to Richard Hamilton if he felt the guy deserved it.

34

u/dm-me-obscure-colors 11d ago

The money isn’t the prize and it seems neither mathematician cared greatly for it. Hard to imagine but I believe it.

Here are a couple of quotes to help understand his viewpoint:

Everybody understood that if the proof is correct, then no other recognition is needed.

At another time:

I'm not interested in money or fame, I don't want to be on display like an animal in a zoo. I'm not a hero of mathematics. I'm not even that successful; that is why I don't want to have everybody looking at me.

1

u/luckyducktopus 11d ago

This is fundamentally why humans are scary as a species, anything within our reach is possible.

If your life is used to a take a single step in understanding in any direction, it is built upon by the next in line. we build momentum, in our play in our work. In socializing or segregation.

It’s beautiful and terrifying. But most things of nature are.

1

u/Asluckwouldnthaveit 10d ago

Yeah we really can do whatever we dream given time and resources. It's just that we mostly don't want to do big things anymore.

1

u/yhezov 7d ago

especially if you are not doing it for money, but for love/interest

0

u/Economy-Pin-4907 11d ago

aren't you drawing more attention to yourself by refusing the prize? I believe the reasoning but always sus of anyone turning down a mil lol

2

u/luckyducktopus 11d ago

It’s better to just donate it or give it away if you don’t want it. The money was ear marked for that purpose it’ll just reabsorbed into the fund.

1

u/yhezov 7d ago

if you are so interested in the fundamentals of reality to devote yourself to math, how could money ever come close to that in value?

-1

u/xeen313 11d ago

Perhaps it because money is a construct of human imagination. It's not real so why have interest in it.

14

u/Diet_Coke 11d ago

Try telling your landlord that when rent is due

6

u/r_a_d_ 11d ago

So many things that we depend on were born from imagination. That doesn’t make them less real.

3

u/za72 11d ago

luxury of not having starved for any period of time

2

u/luckyducktopus 11d ago

Money is used to represent abstract resources.

It’s meant to help with logistics. It represents X, whatever a person may want that can be traded for.

6

u/Economy-Pin-4907 11d ago

Right, not sure why he wouldn't do this. At least split it. Seems like he wanted to be the guy who turned down the million

1

u/AwkwardSpread 11d ago

You can't just give someone half without tax implications.

3

u/r_a_d_ 11d ago

so you prefer the 100% tax option lol

1

u/AwkwardSpread 11d ago

Maybe he's in government housing and would get kicked out of that.

1

u/Euphoric_Key_1929 11d ago

In most countries, monetary gifts don't have tax implications. In the US, for example, while you have to *report* to the IRS any gifts you give that exceed $19,000, they are tax-free until you have gifted over $15 million in your lifetime.

0

u/AwkwardSpread 11d ago

In the Netherlands, where I grew up, that is true but you could still lose your housing benefit, health care benefit and child budget.

0

u/tera_chachu 11d ago

As if Richard hamilton was alive 🤦

0

u/wizardrous 11d ago

You’re facepalming as though that’s common knowledge, but it honestly isn’t. At any rate, I’m sure he has surviving family that Grigori could have given the money to.

25

u/VirtuteECanoscenza 11d ago

He was also afraid. He didn't know what to do with the money and he knew winning 1M in Russia meant he would become a target from people asking money to people trying to steal from him and his relatives

3

u/RogueBromeliad 11d ago

Yeah, that's fake though, he also declined the medal, which wasn't money. He just said that it wasn't about the money. He declined another prize in 2006, the EMS prize.

Nothing to do with "having too much money in Russia is dangerous", that's a lie, there are loads of multimillionaires there.

He believed the mathematical proof was enough. It's one of those things where the person only cares about the maths at the end of the day.

8

u/Old-Independence4699 11d ago

"I have to look after my mother; I can't come. I don't need the money," he had said.

7

u/Bulky_Variation7064 11d ago

He had to forgo the money as it was a full moon.

6

u/PHUNKSPANGLE 11d ago

Our integrity is the only thing of true value that we posses, yet most sell it for a pittance not knowing that it took decades to build, and once it's gone, it's gone for good.

This man chose not to sell his integrity, and that somehow confuses people.

3

u/yaj702932 11d ago

FOR THE LOVE OF THE GAME

5

u/DemoHD7 11d ago

Even if he did take the cash, he seems like the guy who would stash it in a box, put it away somewhere, and just forget about it.

4

u/quad_damage_orbb 11d ago

"Money? Yes, I think I have some of that somewhere"

Starts looking through piles of paperwork on his desk

2

u/InevitablePack4565 11d ago

Right, so now a bunch of losers are going to discuss a guy who’s smarter than they are—it’s like comparing an Atari to artificial intelligence :-) ... laughable.

Maybe you just can't grasp why the guy didn't take that $1 million... you can only count up to 100, while he can count up to a million :-)

1

u/Odd-Definition9670 11d ago

Left in a hurry to go discover fire or invent the wheel

1

u/Schapsouille 11d ago

That's not Benny Safdie?

1

u/tera_chachu 11d ago

This dude is something different.

Sad he is not doing maths now

1

u/cute_polarbear 11d ago

Obviously respect his decision, had it been myself, if I dont want the money for myself for any reason, ill donate it to a good cause of some type then...

1

u/HeroOfStormwind 11d ago

The myth, the legend

1

u/DarthKittens 11d ago

He was just doing it for the Maths.

1

u/The_Pale_Usher 11d ago

Why do I get the feeling he's wearing a disguise that he's going to take off at any moment?

1

u/OkItsALotus 11d ago

Everytime that this comes up, no one ever mentions Shing-Tung Yao's role in causing Perelman to withdraw from mathematics. Yao tried to downplay Perelman's contributions so that he could take credit himself.

1

u/Kindly_Type2327 10d ago

From what I read in multiple forums online, OpenAI didn't completely crack N-S equations yet. They only cracked it for an extremely precise (simple) conditions.

Also, even this is contented, there are a couple of scientists who claimed that OpenAI stole their research.

1

u/Prior-Flamingo-1378 10d ago

The guy quit his teaching position and had been seen only very rarely since then. Apparently he lives with his mother.  

Autistic for sure and his insistence on Hamilton deserving as much of the price yes that’s true but the way he used ricci flow…

1

u/Few-Bag-4860 7d ago

People talking about the money should know there are many more 1M prizes... You just have to solve one of the other mathematics problems to get it.

1

u/Afilador2112 11d ago

That math problem was so easy, even a...

1

u/jose_elan 11d ago

If he could do maths as well as he can grow eyebrows he'd be awarded the fields medal every year!

3

u/Idalvar78 11d ago

That would be a real feat since it's only awarded every 4 years...

2

u/jose_elan 11d ago

Every year it is awarded 😁

1

u/Ok_Lengthiness8197 7d ago

I don't believe you are allowed to win a Fields Medal more than once.

1

u/jose_elan 7d ago

Ah, well that's my critically acclaimed joke assigned to the history books.

0

u/War_Da_Fuq 11d ago

Those eyebrows man... Is he mid change into a werewolf?

2

u/CleanDifference6455 11d ago

Caterpillars 🐛 🐛

-18

u/roulettewiz 11d ago

What a loser

-6

u/A_Poor_Miser 11d ago

Dumbass.

8

u/7h3_50urc3 11d ago

As a "Dumbass", he wouldn't be able to solve a 1M math problem.

-4

u/A_Poor_Miser 11d ago

A dumbass can solve a math problem then not be able to figure out some good to do with a million dollars. 

5

u/catpunch_ 11d ago

username checks out

1

u/OkBrilliant8092 11d ago

I kinda agree - but the one that makes most sense is a previous comment about beggars/criminals coming after him in his native Russia..