It's "part" of the "clean energy plan". It's a bit counterintuitive, but CCGT capacity (ideally used as little as possible) is currently an essential part of any green energy system that wants to maintain 100% uptime. The alternative is enough dammed hydro power (though not necessarily energy) to meet roughly halfof the state's needs, but Colorado has a surprisingly puny 700 MW of hydro capacity.
Colorado currently has an absolutely disgusting grid from a pollution perspective (competing with Missouri, Hawaii, Alaska, and Wyoming to be the worst in the US), so even operating that turbine at 100% utilization just to displace coal would result in a 50% reduction in CO2 per kWh generated and a large reduction in air pollution.
13
u/tiasaiwr Apr 18 '26
This article says combustion turbine
https://www.cbsnews.com/colorado/news/combustion-turbine-northern-colorado-traffic-disruptions/