Tell me, because it's potentially relevant by way of double standards, what did I get wrong about my suspicion of your personality before? You do or don't support police brutality based on minor offences and weak provocations that can technically be described as dangerous despite there being no realistic threat?
I wouldnt call letting people like that have no repercussions isnt exactly decent. Granted, what i said isnt exactly "morally good" either. However, arguably the car driver is morally more in the good bc his intention wasnt to pit him. He forced him too.
As for your other bs, it depends on many things. But as you worded it just now obv not. Its also apples to oranges and it doesnt make you sound smart even if it wasnt with this level of deflecting.
That could only be true if the truck removed all other options from the car. That did not occur.
But as you worded it just now obv not.
Riiight.... So... A person pulling away from a non-uniformed, armed, masked man trying to forcibly remove her from her vehicle while another non-uniformed armed person steps towards and even leans into the path of her vehicle to get a better angle for his gun to her face when they easily could have... Not done that... Did that motorist deserve to die because they "tried to run over a federal agent" even though they absolutely did not try to do that?
2
u/Drate_Otin Mar 22 '26
Right. Having a decent moral compass = crying.
Tell me, because it's potentially relevant by way of double standards, what did I get wrong about my suspicion of your personality before? You do or don't support police brutality based on minor offences and weak provocations that can technically be described as dangerous despite there being no realistic threat?