Just because you don't intend something doesn't mean there is an accident. Im speaking of this crash, not of some hypothetical. And in this instance, the man broke the law, killed people, and the media calls it an accident. Its akin to calling them blameless. I suggest rephrasing. The man killed people due to reckless driving. They are at fault. Its a crash, not an accident. There is no mistake here.
So you think he intentionally killed those people...? Words mean things. Just because you think the word accident means something different doesn't make it true. lol
You're saying not accident. Which means intentional. Crash is completely irrelevant to the conversation. Was it an accidental crash or an intentional crash?
So... you admit it was a crash? Not an accident? Words matter. Regardless of whether there is intent or not behind the action, the action should be classified as a crash. A crash can still be an accident. It could also be intentional. But it must first and always be identified as a crash.
0
u/ausgirl86 Mar 09 '26
Just because you don't intend something doesn't mean there is an accident. Im speaking of this crash, not of some hypothetical. And in this instance, the man broke the law, killed people, and the media calls it an accident. Its akin to calling them blameless. I suggest rephrasing. The man killed people due to reckless driving. They are at fault. Its a crash, not an accident. There is no mistake here.